Guest Derek L Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 no instead your generation cowered behind proxy wars in numerous countries that you and the U.S.S.R divided and ruined Cowered behind? I doubt there was any “cowering” during Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan…… Quote
blueblood Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 Iran has a huge army but they are under fed ...and also that was before nukes were utilized ...much different world back then but now there is the nuclear deterrent so your point doesn't hold an iota of credibility in 2011 that IS why Iran wants nukes..so people can't bully them anymore Point holds. Nazi Germany was bullied as well, they built up an army that was comparable to anyone else and decided to "bully" everyone else. Perhaps if Iran smartened up they wouldn't be bullied anymore. You reasoning is akin to that a street gang should be allowed to have guns because they are being "bullied". We want a world with less nukes, not more. Quote "Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary "Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary Economic Left/Right: 4.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77
Vancouverite Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 I would also support an attack on Iran. Quote
Guest Derek L Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 Derek L. your generation spied on the greatest Canadian of all time Tommy Douglas http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/story/2011/11/12/sk-tommy-douglas-files-cp-1112.html your generation was the most delusional, paranoid generation ever Even paranoids can have enemies Quote
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 Point holds. Nazi Germany was bullied as well, they built up an army that was comparable to anyone else and decided to "bully" everyone else. Perhaps if Iran smartened up they wouldn't be bullied anymore. You reasoning is akin to that a street gang should be allowed to have guns because they are being "bullied". We want a world with less nukes, not more. The US has been invading countries all around Iran for no reason other than taking its Oil and resources...if you can't at least see why Iran is concerned then you are close minded Quote
blueblood Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 I would also support an attack on Iran. I am more of the supporter of change from within, as per the risk of the people of Iran supporting their gov't rather than wanting it gone. Only attack if it's deemed necessary. Quote "Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary "Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary Economic Left/Right: 4.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 Cowered behind? I doubt there was any “cowering” during Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan…… The West and the Soviets ruined Vietnam, Korea and Afghanistan in their quest to one up each other so yes, that is cowering Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 Derek L. your generation spied on the greatest Canadian of all time Tommy Douglas All commies and eugenics nuts were spied on. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 I would also support an attack on Iran. reason being? Quote
g_bambino Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 (edited) if we were a real democracy we'd have a referendum right now to decide whether to support israel in a war against iran If we were what you define as a "real demcoracy" (iwhat the rest of the world calls an "ochlocracy", otherwise known as "mob rule") wouldn't we have to have a referendum on holding a referendum? Otherwise, the decision to hold a referendum would be, by your logic, "undemocratic". [c/e] Edited November 13, 2011 by g_bambino Quote
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 All commies and eugenics nuts were spied on. Communism was never a threat for the west, looking back at history now people must feel really stupid but it gave rise to the U.S military industrial complex so some people benefitted Quote
blueblood Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 The US has been invading countries all around Iran for no reason other than taking its Oil and resources...if you can't at least see why Iran is concerned then you are close minded How much of iraq's oil is going straight to the USA? Iran did it to themselves. Quote "Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary "Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary Economic Left/Right: 4.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 If we were what you define as a "real demcoracy" (iwhat the rest of the world calls an "ochlocracy", otherwise known as "mob rule") wouldn't we have to have a referendum on holding a referendum? Otherwise, the decision to hold a referendum would be, by your logic, "undemocratic". [c/e] I don't participate in semantics Quote
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 How much of iraq's oil is going straight to the USA? Iran did it to themselves. Google is your friend, I am not Quote
g_bambino Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 I don't participate in semantics But you do; it was you who just dictated what "real democracy" is. Quote
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 (edited) But you do; it was you who just dictated what "real democracy" is. It should be up to the people whether or not we go to war you don't need to ask the people if they want to have a choice whether they can make a choice how stupid would that be Edited November 13, 2011 by olp1fan Quote
Guest Derek L Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 Communism was never a threat for the west, looking back at history now people must feel really stupid but it gave rise to the U.S military industrial complex so some people benefitted Ask anyone in Western Europe, Latin American, Asia and Africa if they felt Communism was a threat…….they loved it in Hungry and East Germany…… Quote
Guest Derek L Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 I don't participate in semantics You’re right, or rationality……So why did we have to fight World War two? Quote
blueblood Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 The West and the Soviets ruined Vietnam, Korea and Afghanistan in their quest to one up each other so yes, that is cowering Vietnam is one of the growing economies in Asia and south Korea enjoys a far better fate than it's commie neighbors to the north. Do you suggest that we shouldn't have intervened in south Korea? Do you think that south Korea shouldn't be as advanced as it is today? Quote "Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary "Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary Economic Left/Right: 4.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77
g_bambino Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 It should be up to the people whether or not we go to war Why is it just referenda on war that makes for "real democracy"? What defines "war"? What about when there's not enough time to mount and conduct a referendum? How will every Canadian of voting age be well enough versed in international relations, military capabilities, finances, intelligence assessments, and etc. to make an informed decision? you don't need to ask the people if they want to have a choice whether they can make a choicehow stupid would that be Pretty stupid. But, that's what it looked like you were defining as "real democracy": everyone needs a direct vote on everything. Quote
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 Ask anyone in Western Europe, Latin American, Asia and Africa if they felt Communism was a threat…….they loved it in Hungry and East Germany…… I meant for Canada Quote
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 You’re right, or rationality……So why did we have to fight World War two? Couldn't let Germany invade countries like that...Iran is invading nobody and has not in how many years now/? Quote
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 What defines "war"? What about when there's not enough time to mount and conduct a referendum? There is enough time to do it right now Quote
olp1fan Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 The Conservatives were not elected to majority so that we could go to war against Iran Their ardent support for Israel was not in their election platform Quote
Guest Derek L Posted November 13, 2011 Report Posted November 13, 2011 (edited) Couldn't let Germany invade countries like that...Iran is invading nobody and has not in how many years now/? They’ve involved themselves in supplying arms in both Iraq and Afghanistan, to say nothing about their continued support for Hezbollah. And I'll add, why was WW I "stupid"? Wasn't Germany invading Countries “like that”…….they even reused the Von Schlieffen Plan Edited November 13, 2011 by Derek L Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.