wyly Posted November 8, 2011 Report Posted November 8, 2011 i didnt say take it with force i said buy it holy crap learn to read they have never been for sale nor would they ever consider selling them so force is all that's left...and now with the likelyhood of oil or gas in the area we couldn't afford it... Quote “Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill
Shwa Posted November 8, 2011 Report Posted November 8, 2011 To hell with Greenland.....Turks and Caicos is where it's at We already had our chance with them and sloughed them off. :angry: Quote
Shwa Posted November 8, 2011 Report Posted November 8, 2011 the people in greenland would disagree...you're really intent on another falkland islands event aren't you?...with us re-playing the part of argentina with the same end result... Right, because you know those Danes are really scary with all their Vikings and stuff. Oh. Wait. That was a thousand years ago. I'm shhh-akin'. Maybe we can make a trade. Greenland for a couple of cases of Levis and some health care. They'll go for that. Quote
Smallc Posted November 8, 2011 Report Posted November 8, 2011 (edited) It's the potential can of worms of opening up the constitution to do so, Just make them a territory. The bigger problem is the potential flood of Haitian refugees. Edited November 8, 2011 by Smallc Quote
Smallc Posted November 8, 2011 Report Posted November 8, 2011 constitution should be opened anyways it's way to rigid as it is in regards to change... Yeah, because Constitutions should be changed with every populist whim. Quote
blueblood Posted November 8, 2011 Report Posted November 8, 2011 Just make them a territory. The bigger problem is the potential flood of Haitian refugees. Ah, but Turks and Caicos is already well off and is a British overseas territory. If there is a Haitian refugee problem, they would already have it along with puerto Rico and the virgin and cayman islands. I think it's the constitution and the red tape. Quote "Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary "Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary Economic Left/Right: 4.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77
wyly Posted November 8, 2011 Report Posted November 8, 2011 Right, because you know those Danes are really scary with all their Vikings and stuff. Oh. Wait. That was a thousand years ago. I'm shhh-akin'. Maybe we can make a trade. Greenland for a couple of cases of Levis and some health care. They'll go for that. oh wait denmark is a member of the eu so ya they could could our butts quite easily, whereas france could do it on their own... Quote “Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill
wyly Posted November 8, 2011 Report Posted November 8, 2011 Yeah, because Constitutions should be changed with every populist whim. unlike like now where need 7 provinces to agree before we can change the wattage of a light-bulb,which be never...even the usa has enough flexibility where they can amend theirs we're forever locked in... Quote “Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill
Smallc Posted November 8, 2011 Report Posted November 8, 2011 unlike like now where need 7 provinces to agree before we can change the wattage of a light-bulb,which be never...even the usa has enough flexibility where they can amend theirs we're forever locked in... Ummm, no, actually. Major changes to the US Constitution have similar requirements. Canada's Constitution is no more "locked in" than any other, there are simply strict requirements that, as of now, don't have the political will to be met for any desired change. Oh, and the wattage of a lightbulb can be changed quite easily. There are actually very few things that require the use of the 7/50 formula, and even fewer things that require that the unanimous consent formula be used. Quote
Smallc Posted November 8, 2011 Report Posted November 8, 2011 oh wait denmark is a member of the eu so ya they could could our butts quite easily, whereas france could do it on their own... There you go forgetting about the NORAD defence perimeter again. There are very few countries that could actually defeat Canada in Canada. France might be one - might be....and that's assuming that the USA would sit idly by...which they wouldn't. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.