Failed Conservative Candidates Find New Home...

[Dave_ON]

I guess we're never going to get answers from Sapian to the above questions that were put to him.

Because and appointed senate is discrimination... oops wrong thread

[Saipan]

That's what I'm asking. You're making the claim, so back it up.

That's what I'm asking. You're making the claim, so back it up.

[Saipan]

I guess we're never going to get answers from Sapian to the above questions that were put to him.

Probably not from Sapian. But I may answer it for you. What's the question?

[bloodyminded]

That's what I'm asking. You're making the claim, so back it up.

You're trolling now. But on the off-chance you're not trolling, but are instead unable to follow a simple, back-and-forth post-and-response which includes your own input:

You said MLW was a pinko site, and your evidence was that you were banned for questionable reasons.

That's a claim that demands proof: as in, who else has been banned, and why.

Now that you understand, you realize that I'm right. Good work.

Now, as to backing up your claim....?

Edited May 26, 2011 by bloodyminded

[Wild Bill]

Great to see that Harper lower the bar for his group of hacks and losers.

Max, lying on a beach is not just a consequence of becoming a Senator. It's a method of campaigning to become an NDP Quebec MP!

[Saipan]

You're trolling now.

Actually you are trolling.

You said MLW was a pinko site, and your evidence was that you were banned for questionable reasons.

1) Can you see the moderator denying it?

2) No one is allowed to call Ignatieff common nickname I**y (even he's doesn't object to) while Harper, for example, can be called most anything. (check how the Left call Bush here)

That's a claim that demands proof

There's nothing you can demand while your head is deep in the sand.

[bloodyminded]

There's nothing you can demand while your head is deep in the sand.

Hmm. Rather than taking your claims at face value, but instead asking for evidence of them, is burying my head in the sand?

Perhaps your authoritative remarks aren't as compelling as you think they are.

Edited May 26, 2011 by bloodyminded

[Saipan]

Perhaps your authoritative remarks aren't as compelling as you think they are.

Back to 1) & 2)

[bloodyminded]

Back to 1) & 2)

And again, yet again, we can only know if your "pinko MLW" thesis is sound if we know why other posters were banned as well.

Your claim; you prove it.

[Saipan]

And again, yet again, we can only know if your "pinko MLW" thesis is sound if we know why other posters were banned as well.

Your claim; you prove it.

Your claim. Prove they were.

[bloodyminded]

Your claim. Prove they were.

You should lie down and get some rest.

[g_bambino]

Your claim. Prove they were.

Do you even believe you're making sense?

[Saipan]

That's what I'm asking. You're making the claim, so back it up.

"Do you even believe you're making sense?"