Guest TrueMetis Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 At least you can count...That's a plus!!! Poor...Simple...Luky... Jack leave the poor guy alone. Quote
waldo Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 How are you on topic with this post, simple jacki? You come out of nowhere with this enlightening post. clearly, with your repeat pattern (ala the lukinWay™) you have no desire for "on topic" discussion... you're simply here to stir the pot. You have yet to put up a single post that offers any substantive challenge to consensus climate change related science. In spite of a series of your recent dropped denier blog links being outright trashed/debunked, you're still quite content to devolve this thread into anything but climate science related discussion. It's your way... it's the lukinWay™. Quote
Jack Weber Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 clearly, with your repeat pattern (ala the lukinWay™) you have no desire for "on topic" discussion... you're simply here to stir the pot. You have yet to put up a single post that offers any substantive challenge to consensus climate change related science. In spite of a series of your recent dropped denier blog links being outright trashed/debunked, you're still quite content to devolve this thread into anything but climate science related discussion. It's your way... it's the lukinWay™. The Lukin Way... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
lukin Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 (edited) clearly, with your repeat pattern (ala the lukinWay™) you have no desire for "on topic" discussion... you're simply here to stir the pot. You have yet to put up a single post that offers any substantive challenge to consensus climate change related science. In spite of a series of your recent dropped denier blog links being outright trashed/debunked, you're still quite content to devolve this thread into anything but climate science related discussion. It's your way... it's the lukinWay™. Yep, that's my way waldo. You're another guy who needs to get a life. You need to stop dating this forum. It's bad for your overall well-being. What are you doing to save the planet, waldo? Why can't you answer that simple question? i know why...an original thought is beyond your capabilities. You can only copy and paste..the waldo way. Edited December 6, 2010 by lukin Quote
lukin Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 The Lukin Way... 2:38 A.M??? :lol: Jackoff?? That reeks of desperation. You and waldo repeatedly mentioning "The Lukin Way" That cracks me up. Especially after I embarrassed you already in this thread. You keep coming back for more. Chicks dig guys who live beside their computers. It's amazing you haven't found anyone yet. Maybe the jackoff way is turning them off. Or is 2;38 A.M. the time when there is a big loserfest on your favourite dating site. Jackoff, what really cracks me up is that you had to come on here and say that your avatar looks similar to your imaginary wife. That was hilarious. Keep the laughs coming. You don't realize how much you make me laugh; not because you are funny, but because how you continue to prove you're SOOOOO pathetic. Let me guess...you'll come back parroting waldo...saying something like the lukin way...or calling me simple...right? Jack Weber=40 years old and never kissed a girl. Quote
lukin Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Jack leave the poor guy alone. .....and the unemployed philosopher has spoken. Quote
Shady Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 I see that Jack, Waldo, and TrueMetis have formed a support group. Quote
waldo Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 How are you on topic with this post, simple jacki? You come out of nowhere with this enlightening post. clearly, with your repeat pattern (ala the lukinWay™) you have no desire for "on topic" discussion... you're simply here to stir the pot. You have yet to put up a single post that offers any substantive challenge to consensus climate change related science. In spite of a series of your recent dropped denier blog links being outright trashed/debunked, you're still quite content to devolve this thread into anything but climate science related discussion. It's your way... it's the lukinWay™. Yep, that's my way waldo. You're another guy who needs to get a life. You need to stop dating this forum. It's bad for your overall well-being. What are you doing to save the planet, waldo? Why can't you answer that simple question? i know why...an original thought is beyond your capabilities. You can only copy and paste..the waldo way. hey lukin, just watching your post count rise these last days - hey? why do you care to keep repeatedly asking the question? Answer why it's so important for you to have that answer. Why do you care... what measure would you apply against an answer, any answer. I mean, c'mon... I could just make shit up (ala the lukinWay™)... what would you do with that answer. Why is it so important for you to have that answer, lukin? in any case, do you actually have something to discuss... on topic... or are you simply content to continue to stir the pot and further devolve this thread? Do you actually have something... anything... to discuss? Quote
lukin Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 (edited) Waldo, answer for me how Jack Weber has contributed to this topic? With regards to why I continue to ask you a simple question is because if humans are causing climate change, and you truly believe it, I would really like to know what you are doing to reverse the warming trend caused by humans? And yes, you could make your answer up (typicalwaldostyle) but I'm hoping that for just this simple answer you could be honest. My post count is high because of a fool like Jack Weber who can't realize when he's been embarrassed. He just posts garbage so that he can bury the posts where I showed how big a fool he really is. Edited December 6, 2010 by lukin Quote
waldo Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 per your intent, this thread has been trashed... with several of us contributing to that end. You have no desire for actual legitimate discussion. I have no further interest in wasting additional time with the likes of you. Quote
Shady Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 You have no desire for actual legitimate discussion. Neither do you. Quote
waldo Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Neither do you. bring it on... Professor! Quote
Guest TrueMetis Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 .....and the unemployed philosopher has spoken. Thank you very much I've been looking for a title. Quote
Jack Weber Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Thank you very much I've been looking for a title. I think ol' Luky was taking a shot at me... Poor..Simple...Luky... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
Jack Weber Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 bring it on... Professor! The full name is Professor Kitzel (as in the childrens history show back in the '70's)... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
Shady Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 .....and the unemployed philosopher has spoken. Exactly! They make quite the imrpessive trio. You've got the pseduo-scientist, the unemployed philosopher, and Jack the forum punching bag! Quote
Jack Weber Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Exactly! They make quite the imrpessive trio. You've got the pseduo-scientist, the unemployed philosopher, and Jack the forum punching bag! Really... Could you elucidate for everyone when you have ever bested me at anything you've questioned me on?? Let's reveiew... 20th century history?? Nope... Calling me a leftist,and when asked for actual proof,did any show up??? Nope... You got turned inside out on the Shirly Sherrod thing by myself and a few others... So that's a nope.... Calling my a hypocrit but providing no evidence... Nope... I know what you've bested me in... Slurping the USA... Yeah...You got me there,Professor!! You win!!HHHHeeeerreeeee's your sticker! Oh and following Poor...Simple... Luky... Ya' got me there,too... As I said before,he does make you look like a Mensa member by comparison,so you should take that as a plus! I'll await your comments on my grammar or some sort of crypto-gay reference you seem to be fond of... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
Shady Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 Uh oh, Waldo ain't gonna be too happy! Al Gore's climate group shrinkingOne of Al Gore's campaigns to save the planet has scaled back its field operations since climate legislation failed earlier this year in Congress. The Alliance for Climate Protection was operating in about 25 states at its peak, including Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio and Pennsylvania. But the group now has field offices in just seven states. Politico Looks like Al Gore's gonna have to find another way to make billions. His cap n trade scheme couldn't get out of congress. Quote
Guest TrueMetis Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 Uh oh, Waldo ain't gonna be too happy! Looks like Al Gore's gonna have to find another way to make billions. His cap n trade scheme couldn't get out of congress. Now we see the Al Gore actually matters to climate science fallacy. (though I think it needs a better name) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.