naomiglover Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 This applies to a few posters here: Powerful states often do bad things. When they do, government officials and sympathizers inevitably try to defend their conduct, even when those actions are clearly wrong or obviously counterproductive. This is called being an "apologist," although people who do this rarely apologize for much of anything. Here are my 21 handy talking-points when you need to apply the white-wash: 1. We didn't do it! (Denials usually don't work, but it's worth a try). 2. We know you think we did it but we aren't admitting anything. 3. Actually, maybe we did do something but not what we are accused of doing. 4. Ok, we did it but it wasn't that bad ("waterboarding isn't really torture, you know"). 5. Well, maybe it was pretty bad but it was justified or necessary. (We only torture terrorists, or suspected terrorists, or people who might know a terrorist...") 6. What we did was really quite restrained, when you consider how powerful we really are. I mean, we could have done something even worse. 7. Besides, what we did was technically legal under some interpretations of international law (or at least as our lawyers interpret the law as it applies to us.) 8. Don't forget: the other side is much worse. In fact, they're evil. Really. 9. Plus, they started it. 10. And remember: We are the good guys. We are not morally equivalent to the bad guys no matter what we did. Only morally obtuse, misguided critics could fail to see this fundamental distinction between Them and Us. 11. The results may have been imperfect, but our intentions were noble. (Invading Iraq may have resulted in tens of thousands of dead and wounded and millions of refugees, but we meant well.) 12. We have to do things like this to maintain our credibility. You don't want to encourage those bad guys, do you? 13. Especially because the only language the other side understands is force. 14. In fact, it was imperative to teach them a lesson. For the Nth time. 15. If we hadn't done this to them they would undoubtedly have done something even worse to us. Well, maybe not. But who could take that chance? 16. In fact, no responsible government could have acted otherwise in the face of such provocation. 17. Plus, we had no choice. What we did may have been awful, but all other policy options had failed and/or nothing else would have worked. 18. It's a tough world out there and Serious People understand that sometimes you have to do these things. Only ignorant idealists, terrorist sympathizers, craven appeasers and/or treasonous liberals would question our actions. 19. In fact, whatever we did will be worth it eventually, and someday the rest of the world will thank us. 20. We are the victims of a double-standard. Other states do the same things (or worse) and nobody complains about them. What we did was therefore permissible. 21. And if you keep criticizing us, we'll get really upset and then we might do something really crazy. You don't want that, do you? Repeat as necessary. http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/06/02/defending_the_indefensible_a_how_to_guide Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Weber Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 This applies to a few posters here: Powerful states often do bad things. When they do, government officials and sympathizers inevitably try to defend their conduct, even when those actions are clearly wrong or obviously counterproductive. This is called being an "apologist," although people who do this rarely apologize for much of anything. Here are my 21 handy talking-points when you need to apply the white-wash: 1. We didn't do it! (Denials usually don't work, but it's worth a try). 2. We know you think we did it but we aren't admitting anything. 3. Actually, maybe we did do something but not what we are accused of doing. 4. Ok, we did it but it wasn't that bad ("waterboarding isn't really torture, you know"). 5. Well, maybe it was pretty bad but it was justified or necessary. (We only torture terrorists, or suspected terrorists, or people who might know a terrorist...") 6. What we did was really quite restrained, when you consider how powerful we really are. I mean, we could have done something even worse. 7. Besides, what we did was technically legal under some interpretations of international law (or at least as our lawyers interpret the law as it applies to us.) 8. Don't forget: the other side is much worse. In fact, they're evil. Really. 9. Plus, they started it. 10. And remember: We are the good guys. We are not morally equivalent to the bad guys no matter what we did. Only morally obtuse, misguided critics could fail to see this fundamental distinction between Them and Us. 11. The results may have been imperfect, but our intentions were noble. (Invading Iraq may have resulted in tens of thousands of dead and wounded and millions of refugees, but we meant well.) 12. We have to do things like this to maintain our credibility. You don't want to encourage those bad guys, do you? 13. Especially because the only language the other side understands is force. 14. In fact, it was imperative to teach them a lesson. For the Nth time. 15. If we hadn't done this to them they would undoubtedly have done something even worse to us. Well, maybe not. But who could take that chance? 16. In fact, no responsible government could have acted otherwise in the face of such provocation. 17. Plus, we had no choice. What we did may have been awful, but all other policy options had failed and/or nothing else would have worked. 18. It's a tough world out there and Serious People understand that sometimes you have to do these things. Only ignorant idealists, terrorist sympathizers, craven appeasers and/or treasonous liberals would question our actions. 19. In fact, whatever we did will be worth it eventually, and someday the rest of the world will thank us. 20. We are the victims of a double-standard. Other states do the same things (or worse) and nobody complains about them. What we did was therefore permissible. 21. And if you keep criticizing us, we'll get really upset and then we might do something really crazy. You don't want that, do you? Repeat as necessary. http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/06/02/defending_the_indefensible_a_how_to_guide Did Lictor write this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Dancer Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 Did Lictor write this? Sure sounds like it....the connestion between Nazism and Arab terrorists is a matter of record Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Weber Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 Sure sounds like it....the connestion between Nazism and Arab terrorists is a matter of record Yes...Ba'Athism... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCMan Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 There is also a forum guide which estimates people's moves and it has been pretty accurate...It outlines all the strategies brainwashed people use to justify their side and have no respect for human life or international laws. I will find the link and post it soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pliny Posted June 5, 2010 Report Share Posted June 5, 2010 There is also a forum guide which estimates people's moves and it has been pretty accurate...It outlines all the strategies brainwashed people use to justify their side and have no respect for human life or international laws. I will find the link and post it soon. Does "BC" stand for "Before Christ"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
August1991 Posted June 5, 2010 Report Share Posted June 5, 2010 Powerful states often do bad things.Really? And isn't the term "powerful state" an oxymoron?Nevertheless, I happen to think that the State is a useful institution and has made the world more civilized. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted July 8, 2010 Report Share Posted July 8, 2010 Sure sounds like it....the connestion between Nazism and Arab terrorists is a matter of record Are all of NG's threads about Israel or the Jews, or Jewish influence? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.