Guest TrueMetis Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 That is also my invention before many others even thinking of it. I doubt it, it sounds like a vote bot to me, and vote bots have been around for a long time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjre Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 (edited) I doubt it, it sounds like a vote bot to me, and vote bots have been around for a long time. I don't know what it can be called. I don't know if any other did it or not. I did it at that time independently. That means there are too many people can do it, even if no one invent a particular technology in America, it can be invented in other place by another person. Edited April 11, 2010 by bjre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TrueMetis Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I don't know what is can be called. I don't know if any other did it or not. I did it at that time independently. That means there are too many people can do it, even if no one invent a particular technology in America, it can be invented in other place by another person. Yes people can develop technology independantly in many places at many times. What matters is who patents it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjre Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Yes people can develop technology independantly in many places at many times. What matters is who patents it. It matters only because of the law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Bandelot Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 It matters only because of the law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muddy Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Osama was not part of the Taliban...the Taliban have never had an interest in us and have never attacked us, until we became part of the invasion force it's doubtful any of them could even place Canada on a map...and the same goes for Osama, the AQ never had an issue with Canada only the USA and it's foreign policy, and the USA somehow convinced the gullible that their battle was ours as well... No one disputes that the Taliban Government was giving sanctuary and training camps to Binny Ha Ha Ladin and his happy gang. Since the invasion of Afganistan sanctioned by the UNITED NATIONS and their wish to have NATO prosecute the war in Afganistan, there has not been a successful attack on North America.I hope it stays that way. Lets remember two things. Canadians were killed in 9/11 and Binny the old spoil sport promised he would commit a terrorist attack on Canada. No matter what you think of old Binny, the long Lad does try to keep his promises. As for people referring to me as a NAZI,I thank you for the vote of confidence in my character. I have seen the extemes of National Socialists and communism first hand. Democracy although not perfect because there are no perfect people ,is still the best hope of mankind . It has allowed with all it`s warts to give the majority of it`s people to live at the highest and healthiest standards in the history of man. Utopia will never come closer than what we have achieved since WW2. WW2 and the Cold war ,if not confronted by the western world would have destroyed the freedom we enjoy every day of our lives.The freedom to fail or succeed. The freedom to rise above the station one is born into.The freedom to enjoy argueing and conversing here on this site. The freedom to critisize one another and our elected leaders. What we have achieved in our duty to stand up to the Binny Ladins of this world is to give others pause before attacking us and our way of life. That our allies and friends know we are a stout hearted lot that can be depended upon. Chrieten, Martin and Harper deserve credit for this. Especially Martin and Harper who gave our troops the training ,confidence and tools to fight above their weight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 (edited) What we have achieved in our duty to stand up to the Binny Ladins of this world is to give others pause before attacking us and our way of life. Bin Laden doesn't care about our way of life, his actions are a response to the west(USA) attacking/interferring in his way of life...the US cannot behave any way it wishes with impunity...That our allies and friends know we are a stout hearted lot that can be depended upon. if my friend kicks down my neighbours door evicts him and his family do you expect me to defend my friends actions and come to his aid when my neighbour fights back?..friendship only goes so far, if my friend acts like an asshole he stands alone and faces the consquences... Edited April 11, 2010 by wyly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjre Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 (edited) No one disputes that the Taliban Government was giving sanctuary and training camps to Binny Ha Ha Ladin and his happy gang. Since the invasion of Afganistan sanctioned by the UNITED NATIONS and their wish to have NATO prosecute the war in Afganistan, there has not been a successful attack on North America.I hope it stays that way. Lets remember two things. Canadians were killed in 9/11 and Binny the old spoil sport promised he would commit a terrorist attack on Canada. No matter what you think of old Binny, the long Lad does try to keep his promises. As for people referring to me as a NAZI,I thank you for the vote of confidence in my character. I have seen the extemes of National Socialists and communism first hand. Democracy although not perfect because there are no perfect people ,is still the best hope of mankind . It has allowed with all it`s warts to give the majority of it`s people to live at the highest and healthiest standards in the history of man. Utopia will never come closer than what we have achieved since WW2. WW2 and the Cold war ,if not confronted by the western world would have destroyed the freedom we enjoy every day of our lives.The freedom to fail or succeed. The freedom to rise above the station one is born into.The freedom to enjoy argueing and conversing here on this site. The freedom to critisize one another and our elected leaders. What we have achieved in our duty to stand up to the Binny Ladins of this world is to give others pause before attacking us and our way of life. That our allies and friends know we are a stout hearted lot that can be depended upon. Chrieten, Martin and Harper deserve credit for this. Especially Martin and Harper who gave our troops the training ,confidence and tools to fight above their weight. Several years ago Bush said Iraq has WMD before attacking Iraq, but Iraq did not have it. Recently, someone threat people that H1N1 was pandemic, it just passed. You are just another one who try to using the similar technology here. Terrorists were not in Iraq when Saddam was ruling Iraq before US invade it. Edited April 11, 2010 by bjre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjre Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 (edited) delele Edited April 11, 2010 by bjre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muddy Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 If we had not fought the good fight and gone to help europe in it`s time of need Hitler just may have ruled the western world. I will not forget the attack on the Trade Centers where not only Americans were killed but a lot of Canadians. That was my neighbours door being knocked down Wyly. If you lived next door to me you would feel secure going away and asking me to watch your house. As for Iraq Bjre! I too was convinced that Saddam had nukes. Why? Because the United Nations had no doubt and Saddam would not let UN inspectors do their job. He also gave a great impression that he had them. If you tell me you have a knife in your pocket and are going to cut me up, I will strike first before I allow you the opportunity of slicing and dicing me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 ...As for Iraq Bjre! I too was convinced that Saddam had nukes. Why? Because the United Nations had no doubt and Saddam would not let UN inspectors do their job. He also gave a great impression that he had them. If you tell me you have a knife in your pocket and are going to cut me up, I will strike first before I allow you the opportunity of slicing and dicing me. Correct...UN inspections did not resume until 240,000 US, UK and coalition troops went camping in the Kuwaiti desert. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjre Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 (edited) Correct...UN inspections did not resume until 240,000 US, UK and coalition troops went camping in the Kuwaiti desert. Lie. before the 2nd Iraq war, no UN inspector find any WMD, and they even ask Iraq to destroy very short distance missiles to ensure Saddam has nothing to fight before US attack it. And Bush still told us Iraq has WMD, and Blare said that too, he said Iraq can attach the west in 45 minutes. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8485694.stm Mr Blair was also quizzed about the controversial claim in a September 2002 dossier that Iraq could deploy weapons of mass destruction (WMD) at 45 minutes' notice. Mr Blair said it "assumed a vastly greater significance" afterwards than it did at the time. Edited April 11, 2010 by bjre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Lie. before the 2nd Iraq war, no UN inspector find any WMD, and they even ask Iraq to destroy very short distance missiles to ensure Saddam has nothing to fight before US attack it. No..you LIE. Big time LIE. LIAR LIAR Pants on FIRE! UNSCOM found many prohibited weapons and precursors in Iraq from 1991 - 1998. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#UNSCOM_inspections_1991-1998 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjre Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 No..you LIE. Big time LIE. LIAR LIAR Pants on FIRE! UNSCOM found many prohibited weapons and precursors in Iraq from 1991 - 1998. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#UNSCOM_inspections_1991-1998 So use 1998 data to prove you did not lie about 2002 fact? Even if Iraq had WMD before 1998, was those made in Iraq, had they the ability? Isn't those US/CIA gave them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 So use 1998 data to prove you did not lie about 2002 fact? Even if Iraq had WMD before 1998, was those made in Iraq, had they the ability? Isn't those US/CIA gave them? So you admit that YOU LIE. You must admit bacuse I prove that YOU LIE. UNSCOM destroy many illegal weapons until Saddam kick them out. So US/UK/AUS/POL kick Saddam out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjre Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 So you admit that YOU LIE. You must admit bacuse I prove that YOU LIE. UNSCOM destroy many illegal weapons until Saddam kick them out. So US/UK/AUS/POL kick Saddam out. Kick Saddam out is nothing, but million innocent Iraqi people dead, and thousands US/UK/AUS/POL youth dead. Why their basic human right to survive has to be taken away? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Kick Saddam out is nothing, but million innocent Iraqi people dead, and thousands US/UK/AUS/POL youth dead. Why their basic human right to survive has to be taken away? Why you lie? Human rights include right to die. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Billions upon billions of Canadian tax dollars Where do you get those figures from? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjre Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Why you lie? Human rights include right to die. You are a liar. When American bombs take away their life, they did not want to die, when they die in the hate attack bombs, they did not want to die. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 You are a liar. When American bombs take away their life, they did not want to die, when they die in the hate attack bombs, they did not want to die. But when they die in China, it is good for party! LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muddy Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 There was human rights in Saddam`s Iraq? I chuckle in your general direction you dolt! Saddam was a mass murder` just like your old pal MAO and Stalin. His tribe is still killing people to stop peace from breaking out.To bad you were not with the KURDs when the peace loving Saddam had their villages gassed. You might be a little more suspect of those you defend. Gas warfare was even to insidious for Hitler to use on allied troops. I know he used it on Jewish prisoners. But it is a weopon of mass destruction and Saddam had no compunction about useing it as was proven. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjre Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 But when they die in China, it is good for party! LOL! So now change topic again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjre Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 (edited) There was human rights in Saddam`s Iraq? I chuckle in your general direction you dolt! Saddam was a mass murder` just like your old pal MAO and Stalin. His tribe is still killing people to stop peace from breaking out.To bad you were not with the KURDs when the peace loving Saddam had their villages gassed. You might be a little more suspect of those you defend. Gas warfare was even to insidious for Hitler to use on allied troops. I know he used it on Jewish prisoners. But it is a weopon of mass destruction and Saddam had no compunction about useing it as was proven. You old pal the colonist who killed 100 million aboriginal native Americans. So is this your logic: they have no human right before, let you take away their life? Is there any difference with a murder's logic? How about those western youths? Edited April 11, 2010 by bjre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 So now change topic again? I play with you. You lie too much. Iraq is not in Afghanistan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 You old pal the colonist who killed 100 million aboriginal native Americans. See...you keep saying lies. Why you lie so much? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.