postmaster.general Posted January 20, 2010 Report Posted January 20, 2010 (edited) ... this not a hoax. this is real. the evidence is attached to this post ... ... the corrupt british columbia government is a fascist regime infested with crooks top to bottom. i have concrete, tangible evidence that proves bc's finance minister has participated in an illegal kickback scheme in which the minister receives cash payoffs from the accounting/consulting firm pricewaterhousecoopers inc. (pwc) when pwc is appointed to oversee third-party assets by the supreme court of british columbia ... ... see the evidence here: ILLEGAL KICKBACK SCHEME ... the government of british columbia is sacked ... Edited January 20, 2010 by postmaster.general Quote
William Ashley Posted January 20, 2010 Report Posted January 20, 2010 dude they are taxes. It is a recievorship meaning bankrupcy. Quote I was here.
Bugs Posted January 20, 2010 Report Posted January 20, 2010 dude they are taxes. It is a recievorship meaning bankrupcy. What you say makes sense. I was wondering what kind of amateur would bribe a senior politician with a cheque made out to the oersib ub their capacity as Minister of Finance? Here's a little more about it. Lobbyists at the centre of an RCMP probe into allegations of corruption in the sale of B.C. Rail had a relationship with the Department of Finance's top bureaucrat.An e-mail exchange highlighting the relationship has been obtained by The Globe and Mail. The bribery and influence-peddling trial stemming from the B.C. Rail sale and connected to the December, 2003, raid on the B.C. Legislature is scheduled to start later this spring. Charged in the case are former political aides Dave Basi, Bob Virk and Aneal Basi. All deny wrongdoing. There is a strong likelihood that the memo will be entered as evidence in the Basi/Virk corruption trial. The Crown alleges that Dave Basi and Mr. Virk jeopardized the bidding process for B.C. Rail by leaking documents in the hopes of getting lucrative jobs with the federal government in addition to other benefits. Back in August of 2003, Paul Taylor was arguably the most powerful bureaucrat in the B.C. government and a friend of Brian Kieran, a lobbyist with the Victoria-based government relations firm Pilothouse. Pilothouse represented OmniTRAX, an American company that was bidding on the controversial rail sale that was being handled by the B.C. Ministry of Finance. Erik Bornmann, also a Pilothouse lobbyist, has said he offered bribes and Mr. Kieran, a monetary inducement to Mr. Basi and Mr. Virk in exchange for confidential information related to the sale of B.C. Rail. It is alleged bribe money paid to Dave Basi, a former ministerial assistant to then-finance- minister Gary Collins, was laundered through his cousin, Aneal, a low-level political aide. Lawyers for the accused maintain that Mr. Bornmann and Mr. Kieran could have received information on the B.C. Rail sale from any number of sources, not simply Mr. Basi and Mr. Virk. http://spinwatch.org/latest-news-mainmenu-10/261-lobbying/4141-bc-rail-lobbyists-contacted-financial-officials-e-mails-show I don't know how this would go together, Quote
postmaster.general Posted January 20, 2010 Author Report Posted January 20, 2010 dude they are taxes. It is a recievorship meaning bankrupcy. ... nope. they're not taxes. according to the document the payments are "capital and taxable dividends" from three unlawfully-seized companies named as respondents in a defunct and unregistered sham supreme court of british columbia lawsuit. yes, the lawsuit that supposedly allowed pwc to plunder and loot my family's wealth -- ISN'T EVEN REGISTERED AS A LAWSUIT WITH THE CROWN!!! ... and no this matter isn't a "bankruptcy" proceeding. it is what it is: open warfare against innocent people by the government of british columbia ... Quote
Wilber Posted January 20, 2010 Report Posted January 20, 2010 How do cheques made out to the Minister of Finance become illegal kickbacks? The Ministry is a branch of government. If you are going to make accusations like this, you had better be able to come up with a cheque made out to Colin Hansen or a money trail the ends with him personally. I'm not a big fan of our present provincial government but these kind of accusations without proof really piss me off. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
William Ashley Posted January 20, 2010 Report Posted January 20, 2010 (edited) ... nope. they're not taxes. according to the document the payments are "capital and taxable dividends" from three unlawfully-seized companies named as respondents in a defunct and unregistered sham supreme court of british columbia lawsuit. yes, the lawsuit that supposedly allowed pwc to plunder and loot my family's wealth -- ISN'T EVEN REGISTERED AS A LAWSUIT WITH THE CROWN!!! ... and no this matter isn't a "bankruptcy" proceeding. it is what it is: open warfare against innocent people by the government of british columbia ... Who in your family is involved? Did one of them make the cheque out? Why did they make it out? Why were the companies seized? Edited January 20, 2010 by William Ashley Quote I was here.
bill_barilko Posted January 21, 2010 Report Posted January 21, 2010 OP is a noted nutcase/crank/loonie here in BC who reappears from time to time with variations on the same story-"Gubmint done me/you/everyone in sight wrong". It's all spew. Quote
postmaster.general Posted January 21, 2010 Author Report Posted January 21, 2010 How do cheques made out to the Minister of Finance become illegal kickbacks? The Ministry is a branch of government. If you are going to make accusations like this, you had better be able to come up with a cheque made out to Colin Hansen or a money trail the ends with him personally. I'm not a big fan of our present provincial government but these kind of accusations without proof really piss me off. ... yeh, i've heard that one before: why would you think the minister of finance received the illegal payoffs since the cheques are only made out to the minister of finance? this notion that since the illegal payoffs have been remitted to the minister of finance, that automatically means colin hansen, the minister of finance, can't possibly be the recipient of the unlawful kickbacks is quite comically naive. it's hilarious really. and it's especially naive considering the allegations in the basi/virk breach of trust corruption trial in the supreme court of british columbia that the british columbia liberal party is guilty of laundering the proceeds of illegal drug profits. when i do a google search of "british columbia's minister of finance" it's the minister himself, colin hansen, who comes up. not a government bank account. is colin hansen not the minister of finance? yes he is. i can't interpret the name of the payee of the illegal payoffs literally, as the name is written? get lost. there's no evidence to suggest these laundered payoffs weren't taken by the minister himself. of course the minister of finance received the laundered funds. that's what the letter says ... ... the evidence says it all. the documentation tells us the kickbacks were remitted by pricewaterhousecoopers inc. to the minister of finance by way of a vancouver attorney, a lawyer who does not represent the minister of finance in any legal capacity. the evidence i've posted shows a vancouver, bc attorney who represents neither pricewaterhousecoopers inc. nor the crown accepting in excess of a quarter million dollars from pwc on behalf of the minster of finance pursuant to nothing more than -- A PHONE CALL!!! sure, that sounds like nothing more than basic, lawful, compliant remittance of taxes to the crown and nothing more. gimme a break already ... ... we have to assume that the office of the minister of finance does have administrative bank accounts for day-to-day operations of the office opened in the name "minister of finance" and/or colin hansen, the current minister of finance in british columbia. is there any reason to believe that if someone attempted to deposit a cheque made out to "the minister of finance" into the administrative account of the minister himself, an account the minister and his staff can drawn on, that the cheque wouldn't be accepted by the bank? of course the cheque would be deposited. do you think for one minute a banker would question the office of the minister of finance? the cheque would be accepted as a payment to the minister of finance, either personally or otherwise, with no questions asked ... ... am i not getting through here? we're not children anymore. just take another look at the pwc document i posted. the letter screams fraud, money laundering, breach of trust, theft, conspiracy to defraud and a host of other criminal offenses to anyone with half a brain and it WILL be reported to the police in the near future as proof of an ongoing organized crime problem originating out of the supreme court of british columbia ... ... campbell's government has been busted yet again. the government of bc is lying face down in the gutter with its head blown clear off its shoulders ... ... read more about this government corruption matter here: 9 YEARS OF BOGUS BC SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS Quote
Wilber Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 yeh, i've heard that one before: why would you think the minister of finance received the illegal payoffs since the cheques are only made out to the minister of finance? this notion that since the illegal payoffs have been remitted to the minister of finance, that automatically means colin hansen, the minister of finance, can't possibly be the recipient of the unlawful kickbacks is quite comically naive. Ya, Hansen has a personal bank account in the name of the Minister of Finance. Should be easy enough to check out or are the cops on the take as well? Loony. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
Alta4ever Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 (edited) . Edited January 22, 2010 by Alta4ever Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
ToadBrother Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 ... this not a hoax. this is real. the evidence is attached to this post ... ... the corrupt british columbia government is a fascist regime infested with crooks top to bottom. i have concrete, tangible evidence that proves bc's finance minister has participated in an illegal kickback scheme in which the minister receives cash payoffs from the accounting/consulting firm pricewaterhousecoopers inc. (pwc) when pwc is appointed to oversee third-party assets by the supreme court of british columbia ... ... see the evidence here: ILLEGAL KICKBACK SCHEME ... the government of british columbia is sacked ... BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! I mean, you gotta be kidding, right? Oh, reading down further, you're not. Take your meds, pal. Quote
William Ashley Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 (edited) ... yeh, i've heard that one before: why would you think the minister of finance received the illegal payoffs since the cheques are only made out to the minister of finance? this notion that since the illegal payoffs have been remitted to the minister of finance, that automatically means colin hansen, the minister of finance, can't possibly be the recipient of the unlawful kickbacks is quite comically naive. it's hilarious really. and it's especially naive considering the allegations in the basi/virk breach of trust corruption trial in the supreme court of british columbia that the british columbia liberal party is guilty of laundering the proceeds of illegal drug profits. when i do a google search of "british columbia's minister of finance" it's the minister himself, colin hansen, who comes up. not a government bank account. is colin hansen not the minister of finance? yes he is. i can't interpret the name of the payee of the illegal payoffs literally, as the name is written? get lost. there's no evidence to suggest these laundered payoffs weren't taken by the minister himself. of course the minister of finance received the laundered funds. that's what the letter says ... ... the evidence says it all. the documentation tells us the kickbacks were remitted by pricewaterhousecoopers inc. to the minister of finance by way of a vancouver attorney, a lawyer who does not represent the minister of finance in any legal capacity. the evidence i've posted shows a vancouver, bc attorney who represents neither pricewaterhousecoopers inc. nor the crown accepting in excess of a quarter million dollars from pwc on behalf of the minster of finance pursuant to nothing more than -- A PHONE CALL!!! sure, that sounds like nothing more than basic, lawful, compliant remittance of taxes to the crown and nothing more. gimme a break already ... ... we have to assume that the office of the minister of finance does have administrative bank accounts for day-to-day operations of the office opened in the name "minister of finance" and/or colin hansen, the current minister of finance in british columbia. is there any reason to believe that if someone attempted to deposit a cheque made out to "the minister of finance" into the administrative account of the minister himself, an account the minister and his staff can drawn on, that the cheque wouldn't be accepted by the bank? of course the cheque would be deposited. do you think for one minute a banker would question the office of the minister of finance? the cheque would be accepted as a payment to the minister of finance, either personally or otherwise, with no questions asked ... ... am i not getting through here? we're not children anymore. just take another look at the pwc document i posted. the letter screams fraud, money laundering, breach of trust, theft, conspiracy to defraud and a host of other criminal offenses to anyone with half a brain and it WILL be reported to the police in the near future as proof of an ongoing organized crime problem originating out of the supreme court of british columbia ... ... campbell's government has been busted yet again. the government of bc is lying face down in the gutter with its head blown clear off its shoulders ... ... read more about this government corruption matter here: 9 YEARS OF BOGUS BC SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS No offence intended but how much of them laundered drugs did you do? Note I would like to hear more but can you clarify if the Minister of Finance can cash government cheques into a private bank account made out in his name? If so which bank was used to do so? In Nova Scotia it states "DEPOSITS, EXPENDITURES AND ACCOUNTS 17 (1) All public money received by the Minister (Minister of Finance) shall be deposited to the credit of the Minister in the Consolidated Fund or the appropriate special fund. (2) Except as otherwise provided, where any expenditure is authorized by any act such expenditure may be made from the Consolidated Fund. (3) The Minister (of Finance) shall establish accounts with such banks as he designates for the deposit of public money. " It goes on to state " DUTY OF PERSON RECEIVING PUBLIC MONEY 18 Every person employed in the collection or management or charged with the receipt of public money shall (a) deposit same to the credit of the account of the Province at such places, in such manner and at such times as the Deputy Minister directs; ( keep a record of receipts and deposits thereof in such form and manner as the Deputy Minister directs; © account for same in such manner and at such times as the Deputy Minister directs. The Minister of Finance has delegated the authority for cash management and banking services through the Department of Finance’s Policy on Trading and Signing Authorities to the Department of Finance, Liability Management and Treasury Services Division (LMTS) and the Capital Markets Administration Division." BC's is here: http://www.fin.gov.bc.ca/ocg/fmb/manuals/CPM/07_Revenue_Mgmt.htm it states specifically here the process is normal. 7.3.9 Receipts and Deposits Public money must be deposited promptly to the credit of the Minister of Finance: to an accelerated transfer account at a financial institution; with a government agent; or other person appointed by the Minister of Finance to receive deposits of public money on behalf of the government. Post-dated cheques must be listed and secured until their payment date and deposited promptly at that time. Ministries must issue a receipt to payers of public money that is paid in cash at the time the exchange takes place. Ministries must discourage the remittance of cash through the mail. Ministries must record the collection of all public money. Payment may be made by cash, cheque, or electronically. Ministries can refuse to accept cheques in certain circumstances, which must be approved by the ministry chief financial officer. Cheques and other negotiable instruments must be endorsed "For Deposit Only to the Credit of the Minister of Finance" immediately upon receipt, except for remittances where conditions for payment have not been met (e.g., security deposits). Payments that do not meet payment conditions (e.g., conditional payment) must be returned immediately to the remitter. Whenever payment is made by a cheque by a member of the public in person, ministries must make reasonable checks before accepting the payment. For example, compare the cheque details to the person's separate identification to match the name and address. Ministries must provide adequate facilities for the safekeeping of public money at all times (e.g., from the time received until it is banked). Deposits must be made daily except where circumstances dictate this is not practicable or cost effective. The ministry's chief financial officer must approve any exceptions. Procedure Requirements - G.1 Edited January 22, 2010 by William Ashley Quote I was here.
postmaster.general Posted January 23, 2010 Author Report Posted January 23, 2010 ... thanks for the information ... ... the pricewaterhousecoopers inc. documentation shows a vancouver, bc attorney laundering over a quarter million dollars to the crown through the minister of finance. the attorney represents neither pwc nor the crown (although obviously the lawyer represents the crown in some capacity if he's laundering payoffs to the minister of finance). the illegal payoffs are falsely described as "capital and taxable dividends." wake up. that's a screaming red flag right there. shareholders receive capital and taxable dividend payments from privately-owned companies -- not the minister of finance ... ... tell me, what does the bullshit legislation say about laundered bribe payoffs being stuffed into the back pocket of the minister of finance through sleazebag barmuda mob bagmen who attempt to pass themselves off as bona fide attorneys? ... the government of canada has fallen ... SOME LIKE IT BRUTAL Quote
William Ashley Posted January 23, 2010 Report Posted January 23, 2010 ... thanks for the information ... ... the pricewaterhousecoopers inc. documentation shows a vancouver, bc attorney laundering over a quarter million dollars to the crown through the minister of finance. the attorney represents neither pwc nor the crown (although obviously the lawyer represents the crown in some capacity if he's laundering payoffs to the minister of finance). the illegal payoffs are falsely described as "capital and taxable dividends." wake up. that's a screaming red flag right there. shareholders receive capital and taxable dividend payments from privately-owned companies -- not the minister of finance ... ... tell me, what does the bullshit legislation say about laundered bribe payoffs being stuffed into the back pocket of the minister of finance through sleazebag barmuda mob bagmen who attempt to pass themselves off as bona fide attorneys? ... the government of canada has fallen ... SOME LIKE IT BRUTAL I'm not following it says they are income taxes... Quote I was here.
postmaster.general Posted January 25, 2010 Author Report Posted January 25, 2010 I'm not following it says they are income taxes... ... lying only destroys your credibility in this discussion. the document clearly claims the payoffs are "capital and taxable dividends" -- not income tax. the "taxable" in "taxable dividends" means the dividends the minister of finance unlawfully received are supposedly subject to taxation ... SOME LIKE IT BRUTAL Quote
Oleg Bach Posted January 26, 2010 Report Posted January 26, 2010 ... lying only destroys your credibility in this discussion. the document clearly claims the payoffs are "capital and taxable dividends" -- not income tax. the "taxable" in "taxable dividends" means the dividends the minister of finance unlawfully received are supposedly subject to taxation ... SOME LIKE IT BRUTAL Sometimes when you pay taxes you end up giving money to those that don't pay taxes..could be the poor guy or the billionare that benefit. In ancient times if you did not pay protection money or tribute to who ever was in power..it would be off to the dungeon with you. Wonder if Mulroney paid the full tax on those bags of money he recieved? The local poor kids shake down other poor kids for their lunch money and they call it "taxing" - I find the whole idea of taxes very taxing - and they always threaten you with - death and taxes. Quote
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.