Wilber Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 No, it doesn't. It illustrates my opinion and that Wiber doesn't bother to read it. I read it, I just don't agree with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 As I said, mostly, but not only. I also said why I thought that's fine. Do you read what people write? If not only, who else then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 I read it, I just don't agree with it. Your response didn't indicate that. If not only, who else then? As does this one. I already answered this question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Your response didn't indicate that. As does this one. I already answered this question. Waisting my time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 (edited) Waisting my time. Well, if you don't want the inconvenience of reading others' comments, make a blog, or something. This is the wrong place for you. [sp (you should try it, Wilber)] Edited December 30, 2009 by g_bambino Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Well, if you don't want the inconvenience of reading others' comments, make a blog, or something. This is the wrong place for you. [sp (you should try it, Wilber)] Black is white. When you don't want to answer a question you say you have already answered it. When you don't want to address something, you ignore it. Waist of time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 (edited) When you don't want to answer a question you say you have already answered it. When you don't want to address something, you ignore it. When you want to make it seem like I ignored something, you say I did. Okay; but, too bad my words are right there in black and white to prove you wrong. Maybe, in future, you'd should try and rephrase your questions better? Waist of time. I think you mean "waste" of time, Wilber. [punct] Edited December 30, 2009 by g_bambino Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 I think you mean "waste" of time, Wilber. Exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Another reason to elect citizens to sit in the court system. The judical system works a little bit like the American CIA. The CIA likes to destabalize a society domestically or abroad. It's an old concept still uses of devide and conquer by keeping the citizens on edge and unable to focus on real issues. I suspect that those that appoint judges are very power orintated to the point of abuse mixed with an irratial sense of control of percieved lessors. Personally I have witnessed the court of appeal protect a corrupt and ailing trial judges who was so obsese that he could not move..and was in so much pain that he was not fit to sit. This old judge was clearly following some sort of policy and not the rule of law..our courts are driven by policy and not by what is right or wrong - The panel at the court of appeal attempted to protect this old boys club judge by saying he "mis-spoke" - I would say with confidence that if he mis-spoke then he mis-thought and mis-judged. CANADA should return to real a real judgement based system rather than an auto-piloted policy driven sham. When a situation is immoral it should be illegal..simple as that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry J. Fortin Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 The judical system works a little bit like the American CIA. The CIA likes to destabalize a society domestically or abroad. It's an old concept still uses of devide and conquer by keeping the citizens on edge and unable to focus on real issues. I suspect that those that appoint judges are very power orintated to the point of abuse mixed with an irratial sense of control of percieved lessors. Personally I have witnessed the court of appeal protect a corrupt and ailing trial judges who was so obsese that he could not move..and was in so much pain that he was not fit to sit. This old judge was clearly following some sort of policy and not the rule of law..our courts are driven by policy and not by what is right or wrong - The panel at the court of appeal attempted to protect this old boys club judge by saying he "mis-spoke" - I would say with confidence that if he mis-spoke then he mis-thought and mis-judged. CANADA should return to real a real judgement based system rather than an auto-piloted policy driven sham. When a situation is immoral it should be illegal..simple as that! Hang on.....who determines what is moral and what is not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Hang on.....who determines what is moral and what is not? Right. His post begged--begged!--that question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.