Jump to content

Justice Souter To Retire


Recommended Posts

An American President's job is never done.....

NPR has learned that Supreme Court Justice David Souter is planning to retire at the end of the court's current term.

The court has completed hearing oral arguments for the year and will be issuing rulings and opinions until the end of June.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.p...oryId=103694193

Edited by bush_cheney2004
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Souter, Ginsberg and Stevens...... this term is my bet., I wonder if Kennedy and Scalia may go during a possible second Obama term, if they don't pass during the first. It certainly would make things interesting.

It is probably what makes Republicans most crazy about in terms of losing this last election.

No predicting on the Supreme Court retirements. The long lead time to that choice should give Obama a chance to think of some good candidates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is probably what makes Republicans most crazy about in terms of losing this last election.

Are you serious? After watching Obama sign a bill(after letting it sit on his desk over the weekend, after he hurried the congress so much they didn't even read it so they could get it on his desk faster) to spend $780 billion to save America, but it doesn't really kick in until 2010, you think replacing one liberal judge with another tops that? Man, take off your liberal coloured glasses or risk further embarrassment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conservatives target Sotomayor, Kagan, Wood

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/050...Kagan_Wood.html

A conservative politico likely to work on the coming judicial nomination battle sends over a memo circulating on the right, which targets three likely Obama nominees: Judge Sonia Sotomayor, Judge Diane Wood, and Solicitor General Elena Kagan.

The early lines seem to be attacks on Kagan's lack of bench experience, Sotomayor's "temperament," and Wood's rulings on hot-button issues, including an application of a RICO statute in a case against hard-line anti-abortion activist Randall Terry.

I wonder if this is when 60 votes in the Senate won't come in handy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,731
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Michael234
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • lahr earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • lahr earned a badge
      First Post
    • User went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...