Oleg Bach Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 fine then – yours is a futures gleeful embrace of the poodle term for poodle actions not yet realized… coupled with past situations where you have reservations about disclosing examples that would warrant your continued use of a poodle term you can’t – or won’t – substantiate. Clearly, your repeated use of the poodle term provides you a relief outlet to counter some degree of diminished superiority – whether personal or related to the loss of standing of your country given the Bush debacle. The Bush debacle is right up there will Malroney and the gun runner...or millions missing - who was that - Stewart lady - or bribing a dying man and showing that the courts are not about to condemn crooks - I would say that America is at least honest about being dishonest...they face the reality that they have practice deception with evil intent - we do not - because we still have that British thing going on - you know - stiff upper lip and look the man in the eye and lie...and when confronted we can do the royal "we are offended - how dare you?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alta4ever Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 perhaps you could elaborate on the "blow hard" attachment - uhhh, for Obama, not yourself. If you actually listen to him speak instead of swoooning over every word you would realize in the long answers and speeches he has give what he has said amounts to nothing. He speaks in broad generalities gives no details and typically talks in circles, a blow hard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 If you actually listen to him speak instead of swoooning over every word you would realize in the long answers and speeches he has give what he has said amounts to nothing. He speaks in broad generalities gives no details and typically talks in circles, a blow hard. Finally someone with ears actually connected to the brain! Obamas' speech writers are plaguristic up starts...The collect hundreds of lines from great orators - alter them and string them together to give the speech the flavour or oratorial elequence ----If you look at the root of elequent - you will see it means to control the emotions though speech....It's a very seductive and musical approach...but there is really no meaning ---It's like sex with a stranger. But we have those among us who will utter I love you during orgasm - and it is not love - it is sensuality and the release of chemical compounds similar to heroine --- If religion is the opiate of the masses...Obama spews forth intoxicants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alta4ever Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 (edited) If you don't like my take on it how about from some one who is world renowned and considered to be n expert in their feild. Barack Obama - Narcissist or Merely Narcissistic?Sam Vaknin, Ph.D. - 8/13/2008 Barack Obama appears to be a narcissist. Granted, only a qualified mental health diagnostician can determine whether someone suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) and this, following lengthy tests and personal interviews. But, in the absence of access to Barack Obama, one has to rely on his overt performance and on testimonies by his closest, nearest and dearest. http://www.globalpolitician.com/25109-barack-obama-elections Edited February 23, 2009 by Alta4ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realist Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 By his own admission, his take is utterly incomplete without access to Obama himself. Useless. What's the point of this personal attack? About as much value as the delirious euphoria Democrats are experiencing over his victory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progressive Tory Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Now, now, lets not make this a spelling and grammar class. Your use of punctuation really doesn't solidify your postion as the grammar police. Keep the insults to at least insulting someone's mother, not there spelling. Why I tends me the Stukell Day Bible skool and we gets lots a that thar grammer en such. Lerns da mathmatikel skils two. Got my diplomy rite thur on da wall, I do. Nope...dun need no uppidy leftie teechin me how da spell, just cuz yo mamma dresses ya funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progressive Tory Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't the opposition saying that Harper and Bush were natural allies? Doyle seems to have forgotten this fact in his zeal to aggrandize the connection between Obama and Ignatieff. Harper and Bush were natural allies. He got that right. The problem is that Canadians hated Bush - they love Obama. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 If you don't like my take on it how about from some one who is world renowned and considered to be n expert in their feild.http://www.globalpolitician.com/25109-barack-obama-elections oh please - do you not think anyone will call you on your shyte? your world renowned expert openly states he's not a mental health professional, notwithstanding he holds a Philosophy PhD from the highly disreputable Pacific Western University... an "institution" that when it was open, was completely unaccredited - a most notorious diploma mill. That's your world renowned expert! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alta4ever Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 By his own admission, his take is utterly incomplete without access to Obama himself. Useless.What's the point of this personal attack? About as much value as the delirious euphoria Democrats are experiencing over his victory. Only useless because you worship at the alter of empty personality. This is a true reflection of what is presented by Obama in public, now if you don't beleive this person fine but his expertise far surases your own so, you seem to be happy to follow blind ignorance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alta4ever Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 oh please - do you not think anyone will call you on your shyte?your world renowned expert openly states he's not a mental health professional, notwithstanding he holds a Philosophy PhD from the highly disreputable Pacific Western University... an "institution" that when it was open, was completely unaccredited - a most notorious diploma mill. That's your world renowned expert! more enlightened then you, and the crap you spew around here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realist Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 oh please - do you not think anyone will call you on your shyte?your world renowned expert openly states he's not a mental health professional, notwithstanding he holds a Philosophy PhD from the highly disreputable Pacific Western University... an "institution" that when it was open, was completely unaccredited - a most notorious diploma mill. That's your world renowned expert! It would be interesting to know how this "expert" leans politically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alta4ever Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 (edited) It would be interesting to know how this "expert" leans politically. It would be nice to know how most of the acedemia lean politically. Wait a minute we do, most are looney leftist idiots who indoctrinate their students instead of teach them. Edited February 23, 2009 by Alta4ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realist Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 It would be nice to know how most of the acedemia lean politically. I imagine some lean 'left' and others lean 'right, with a healthy majority in the 'center.' Wishy washy, inferred attacks on the entire spectrum left of yourself are boring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alta4ever Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 (edited) I imagine some lean 'left' and others lean 'right, with a healthy majority in the 'center.'Wishy washy, inferred attacks on the entire spectrum left of yourself are boring. Really, then have fun with your boring socialist friends who care not about the lack content of the speeches of the idols you worship. Empty rhetoric to enthrall the masses. Edited February 23, 2009 by Alta4ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 more enlightened then you, and the crap you spew around here. not a problem Alta4ever... perhaps you may yet come forward with something that actually has a truthful substantive foundation. As it stands, you've shown no propensity for nonpartisan dialogue as you continue to beak off like a crazed redneck right-winger. It's easy to dismiss your hyperbole, your skewed references and your outright falsifications. carry on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progressive Tory Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 About as much value as the delirious euphoria Democrats are experiencing over his victory. I'm still delirious after watching Bush finally leave and my ears are still ringing over the cheers heard around the world. Obama represents hope after the hopeless Bush years. Obama and Ignatieff together represent intelligence and diplomacy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alta4ever Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 not a problem Alta4ever... perhaps you may yet come forward with something that actually has a truthful substantive foundation. As it stands, you've shown no propensity for nonpartisan dialogue as you continue to beak off like a crazed redneck right-winger. It's easy to dismiss your hyperbole, your skewed references and your outright falsifications. carry on Really though I posted a link to that, but I guess unless it comes from the CBC you aren't apt to recognize it are you? If it doesn't fit your hero worship and left leanings it is something to be ignored or dismissed because it doesn't fit with your worship at the alter of socialism. Carry on with your misguided and false images, if you would read your own posts you would relise that the leftist crap you spew is nothing more then partisan dialogue that you mistake as non partisan as it come from your camp. I am not non partisan and never have claimed to be I am a small c conservative, I beleive in the values of true conservatism and have no place in mind for the endless void of principle that the left has. You people are mear sheep looking to worship at the alter of personality, and attack anything that challenges that belief you are as bad as religious extremists in a new found cult, the cult of personality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realist Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 I'm still delirious after watching Bush finally leave and my ears are still ringing over the cheers heard around the world. Obama represents hope after the hopeless Bush years. Obama and Ignatieff together represent intelligence and diplomacy. heh, going from A to C there. Ignatieff has an election to win first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alta4ever Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 I'm still delirious after watching Bush finally leave and my ears are still ringing over the cheers heard around the world. Obama represents hope after the hopeless Bush years. Obama and Ignatieff together represent intelligence and diplomacy. They represent two men of establishment who have trouble thinking outside the boax as they both have spent so many years in instatutions that have strict walls and little dissent. egoistical elitists who think they are superior to the ordinary man because of a couple of signed peices of paper that they think proclaim thier intellegence. Obama is poised to repeat the mistakes of Jimy Carter and Micheal is poised to repeat the mistakes of Dion, but a least this time we will be able to understand whatthis one is saying and just how foolish the whole carbon tax wealth redistrabution scheme really is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 They represent two men of establishment who have trouble thinking outside the boax as they both have spent so many years in instatutions that have strict walls and little dissent. egoistical elitists who think they are superior to the ordinary man because of a couple of signed peices of paper that they think proclaim thier intellegence. Obama is poised to repeat the mistakes of Jimy Carter and Micheal is poised to repeat the mistakes of Dion, but a least this time we will be able to understand whatthis one is saying and just how foolish the whole carbon tax wealth redistrabution scheme really is. Go into the average university - in Canada - or America..find yourself a professor and ask him or her privately what they truely profess. You will see in the box idealism that is dated and imperfect....acedemics have not sloved the worlds problems - There is no solid evidence that they ever will - Look at the summits that take place all over the world - they are full of the iggy factor...and every year they come up with the same thing and parrot the same theoreticals that are quite useless - stop putting these meat puppets up to be worshipped..there is no salvation coming from a book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progressive Tory Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 You need ot read some history books instead of just swallowing everything that your high school social teacher told you and the tv programs. I could if I gave a flying fig. I've also read books on Hitler, including Mein Kampf, which became 'my struggle'. Hitler was a right wing fanatic. He was a devout Catholic who made many references in his speeches to God and to crushing Communism. He may have used socialism to sell his ideas, but there was nothing socialist about his policies. His ideology was about as far right as you can get. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Really though I posted a link to that, but I guess unless it comes from the CBC you aren't apt to recognize it are you? If it doesn't fit your hero worship and left leanings it is something to be ignored or dismissed because it doesn't fit with your worship at the alter of socialism. Carry on with your misguided and false images, if you would read your own posts you would relise that the leftist crap you spew is nothing more then partisan dialogue that you mistake as non partisan as it come from your camp. I am not non partisan and never have claimed to be I am a small c conservative, I beleive in the values of true conservatism and have no place in mind for the endless void of principle that the left has. You people are mear sheep looking to worship at the alter of personality, and attack anything that challenges that belief you are as bad as religious extremists in a new found cult, the cult of personality. the link you posted is a sham – your world renowned expert’s education is an unaccredited non-related PhD from a now closed disreputable diploma mill. you will gain respect and credibility if you pull back your blinders and recognize that not everything fits your narrow-minded left versus right channeling. It is prudent upon you to point out the inadequacies of comment counter to your observations, to your perceived political ideology… equally, the onus is on you to highlight lacking principles from what you describe as the “leftist camp”. But you do neither, as it appears far easier for you to pull out the talking points rather than put an actual effort into bringing forward substantiated critique. I recognize it is quite frustrating for self-described small-c conservatives (as yourself), given the state of Harper’s CPC and it’s lack of real fiscal conservatism. Accordingly, I’ll cut you some slack for your last comments about the alter/cult of personality… perhaps Harper’s missing personality has also unduly influenced you in this regard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progressive Tory Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 but a least this time we will be able to understand whatthis one is saying and just how foolish the whole carbon tax wealth redistrabution scheme really is. I don't even understand what you just said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progressive Tory Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 - stop putting these meat puppets up to be worshipped..there is no salvation coming from a book. That may be true, but Ignatieff's experiences come from doing. As a journalist and documentary filmmaker, he travelled to war torn counties, then wrote his books. It was his vast experience that resulted in Ivy League schools wanting him, not just his Ivy League education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 That may be true, but Ignatieff's experiences come from doing. As a journalist and documentary filmmaker, he travelled to war torn counties, then wrote his books. It was his vast experience that resulted in Ivy League schools wanting him, not just his Ivy League education. Don't tell anyone - but I am willing to give the guy a chance ---keep that to yourself....I sort of lost respect for Harper when he agreed to "extend" the "mission" in Afghanistan...as if by a certain date there would be a miracle and we would be victorious - time will not win this conflict...so why extend it if the results ten years from now would be the same as if we pulled out yesterday. This sucking up to the military industrial complex may be good for big buisness and for Harpers career but it is of little use to little me or you...Harper had potential...but that last bit of henchmening for arms dealers made me lose faith ----Question ---- IF Ignatieff was PM - would he remove our former peace keepers turned killing machines from Afghanistan??? Answer please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.