Wilber Posted April 10, 2008 Report Posted April 10, 2008 From Vancouver Sun The part I like best is: Quinteros has been ruled inadmissible for refugee status because of his links to a criminal organization, but he remains free awaiting a pre-removal risk assessment, which could take months. The guy has been ruled inadmissible. Why are they having a "pre-removal risk assessment, which could take months"? Whatever that is. Who built this horses ass system? Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
Sean Hayward Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 The Liberal Party of Canada built this "horses ass" immigration system. If anyone tries to change it, they are condemned as racist. Quote
FTA Lawyer Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 From Vancouver SunThe part I like best is: The guy has been ruled inadmissible. Why are they having a "pre-removal risk assessment, which could take months"? Whatever that is. Who built this horses ass system? The small thudding sound you just heard was my King falling to the chess board on it's side. Even I can't attempt to offer an explanation for this one. FTA Quote
August1991 Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Quinteros has been ruled inadmissible for refugee status because of his links to a criminal organization, but he remains free awaiting a pre-removal risk assessment, which could take months.I would imagine that the risk assessment concerns whether he can be "safely" returned to El Salvador. He is deemed not to be a refugee but that doesn't mean we would necessarily deport him. We don't deport people to countries where they may suffer the death penalty.There are two features in this case that strike me: First, he entered through the US and then made a refugee claim here. I thought we now applied the safe third country policy. (He should have been returned to the US immediately.) Second, immigration should have detained him immediately because of his criminal admissions. I fear that this is one case among many; most never come to light because the bureaucracy buries them. And no bureaucrat will ever take responsibility for this. "I was just applying the regulations." Quote
Wilber Posted April 11, 2008 Author Report Posted April 11, 2008 There are two features in this case that strike me: First, he entered through the US and then made a refugee claim here. I thought we now applied the safe third country policy. (He should have been returned to the US immediately.) Second, immigration should have detained him immediately because of his criminal admissions. Exactly US citizens with impaired driving convictions must turn around. Admitted killers from Central America, not so much. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
Who's Doing What? Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Ship his sorry gangsta arse back!!!!!!!!!!! $500 or so for a plane ticket. I'll donate a buck. I am sure it would not be a problem to find another 499 people who would want this man out of our country. Who gives a rats butt cheeks what happens to a carreer crimianl if he is sent back to his own country? If he knew what the penalty was and was breaking the law there, then he should go back and face his sentemce. "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time." Quote Harper differed with his party on some key policy issues; in 1995, for example, he was one of only two Reform MPs to vote in favour of federal legislation requiring owners to register their guns. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/election/bio/harper.html "You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society." (Stephen Harper, Report Newsmagazine, January 22, 2001)
Argus Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Ship his sorry gangsta arse back!!!!!!!!!!!$500 or so for a plane ticket. I'll donate a buck. I am sure it would not be a problem to find another 499 people who would want this man out of our country. Who gives a rats butt cheeks what happens to a carreer crimianl if he is The system. There are all sorts of murderers, rapists, child molesters and drug dealers walking free in Canada despite multiple convictions here because the refugee board or the courts have said that life would be too dangerous for them if we send them home. Sometimes the fear is of torture from the government, sometimes it is private entities. I think we have some women here who feared they would be beaten by their ex husbands, or attacked by their family. Others are here for fear of being murdered by their ex-compatriates in guerrila, terrorist or criminal organizations. The system does not take into account that you might be an absolute scumbag and a danger to the public here. It only cares about the danger to the "refugee". Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Borg Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 And people are complaining because of a potential immigration policy change? Borg Quote
DogOnPorch Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 (edited) This fellow is from MS-13 and we're letting him roam free??? What stupid idiots. We should just shoot these scum like El Salvador does. That's Mara Salvatrucha for those unaware...the most dangerous gang in the World. They are not quaint old fools like the H.A. Here's one of their less violent acts: Among the most notorious local crimes attributed to MS-13 was the gang rape of two deaf girls, one 14, the other 17, in a Somerville park in 2002. Three MS-13 gang members were charged in the brutal rapes, during which one victim was knocked from her wheelchair before the assault. ...all this because one of the girl's brother was having trouble with MS-13 members. The father got involved and confronted them. The gang's response was to rape the diabled girls in public. Take a peek...they have a very, very disturbing record. Tick-tock, tick-tock Canada... ----------------------------------------------------- Reloj no marques las horas porque voy a enloquecer... ---El Reloj Edited April 12, 2008 by DogOnPorch Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
DogOnPorch Posted April 12, 2008 Report Posted April 12, 2008 One of Ross Kemp's documentaries about street gangs....MS-13. http://www.all-encompassingly.com/el-salva...vatrucha-ms-13/ ------------------------------------------- Ehhh...what's up, Doc?? ---Buggs Bunny Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
manasketa Posted April 15, 2008 Report Posted April 15, 2008 Interesting that he should be able to benefit from every loophole in the system, while circumventing the regulations designed to restrict asylum shopping (the Safe Third Country agreement). Methinks someone has a good immigration lawyer. Quote
Qwerty Posted April 15, 2008 Report Posted April 15, 2008 Leftist types will complain and protest about anything and everything that is the least bit right of their views. These are people with a hippy type of mentality, lets not forget that. Anyone else is Mike Harris clone. This is their standard retort to any argument they can't win. Quote
madmax Posted April 15, 2008 Report Posted April 15, 2008 Tick-tock, tick-tock Canada... This country has been ruled by Conservatives and this nonsense continues. This is purely incompetence. How could the Police not been informed? How could this individual, an admitted killer be allowed in without any safeguards for the public? TickTock indeed. Quote
mikedavid00 Posted April 15, 2008 Report Posted April 15, 2008 From Vancouver SunThe part I like best is: The guy has been ruled inadmissible. Why are they having a "pre-removal risk assessment, which could take months"? Whatever that is. Who built this horses ass system? I agree. He needs to get the hell out. Our immigration system is a joke. We need to clean up our country. Quote ---- Charles Anthony banned me for 30 days on April 28 for 'obnoxious libel' when I suggested Jack Layton took part in illegal activities in a message parlor. Claiming a politician took part in illegal activity is not rightful cause for banning and is what is discussed here almost daily in one capacity or another. This was really a brownshirt style censorship from a moderator on mapleleafweb http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1oGB-BKdZg---
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.