old_bold&cold Posted October 10, 2007 Report Posted October 10, 2007 The moderators send messages and give warnings and not say to remove anything, then weeks later I get from greg remove or get Banned. Well it is removed and if there were any way to reply to these messages it would have been done much quicker and with out the threats. This is something that should be looked at. Yes I probably should not have used the term retarded, but then again in context it was over the mark but it was also heated discussion. If you are not going to allow us to reply and discuss these things then how are we to take that. The message said it was not allowed but I had assumed that as with moderators they have the ability to edit it and that had already been done. I would have not complained at his doing so. The truth be told I never ever went back to see if he had or had not edited it. So in the interest of fairness I believe we should be allowed to reply to messages sent. not so much to argue, but to find out more as to why and what you want done. It is not as if moderators would be flooded with these replies. Quote
shavluk Posted October 10, 2007 Report Posted October 10, 2007 Dont know what this is about but I am assuming some one called you on your view? eh? GOOD !!! Quote
jazzer Posted October 10, 2007 Report Posted October 10, 2007 The moderators send messages and give warnings and not say to remove anything, then weeks later I get from greg remove or get Banned. Well it is removed and if there were any way to reply to these messages it would have been done much quicker and with out the threats. This is something that should be looked at. Yes I probably should not have used the term retarded, but then again in context it was over the mark but it was also heated discussion. If you are not going to allow us to reply and discuss these things then how are we to take that. The message said it was not allowed but I had assumed that as with moderators they have the ability to edit it and that had already been done. I would have not complained at his doing so. The truth be told I never ever went back to see if he had or had not edited it. So in the interest of fairness I believe we should be allowed to reply to messages sent. not so much to argue, but to find out more as to why and what you want done. It is not as if moderators would be flooded with these replies. Follow the rules and you'll do fine. Quote
old_bold&cold Posted October 10, 2007 Author Report Posted October 10, 2007 Dont know what this is about but I am assuming some one called you on your view? eh?GOOD !!! Shavluk you do not like my view on things and that is just too bad. Just as you embarass yourself daily here with your drug rectoric, and you do not like being called on that. I almosted choked when I saw you actually are running and believe me The green party is not supportting your views on this, and they say you are on your own. But yes I called your buuddy retarded and that was against the rules. I like many people here do not keep a finger on the report button. I have also been admonished because I shared my true feeling about Chretien on here but wheile it was seen in bad taste, it was not really against the rules. That is it for messages pretty much and this thread was only because in the message they didi not say to change it and I had thought they already had. But that is life. I still say that these messages need to be able to responded to, and it is not fair to block them. Again that is my opinion if the Administration dis agrees then I would hope they will so and why. Quote
old_bold&cold Posted October 10, 2007 Author Report Posted October 10, 2007 Dont know what this is about but I am assuming some one called you on your view? eh?GOOD !!! Shavluk you do not like my view on things and that is just too bad. Just as you embarass yourself daily here with your drug rectoric, and you do not like being called on that. I almosted choked when I saw you actually are running and believe me The green party is not supportting your views on this, and they say you are on your own. But yes I called your buuddy retarded and that was against the rules. I like many people here do not keep a finger on the report button. I have also been admonished because I shared my true feeling about Chretien on here but wheile it was seen in bad taste, it was not really against the rules. That is it for messages pretty much and this thread was only because in the message they didi not say to change it and I had thought they already had. But that is life. I still say that these messages need to be able to responded to, and it is not fair to block them. Again that is my opinion if the Administration dis agrees then I would hope they will so and why. Quote
Charles Anthony Posted October 11, 2007 Report Posted October 11, 2007 Why would you block the members from being able to reply to messages?We do not. and if there were any way to reply to these messagesThere is certainly a way to reply to the Personal Messages and there always has been. There is a Reply button at the bottom of the screen and that Reply button looks the same as all the other Reply buttons. There may possibly be a deficiency in technical skills or computer platforms among the members of the forum. It was for this reason that the thread: Personal Messaging within the forum, check your folder routinely was posted. Each member must be responsible for using the features of the forum correctly themselves. The alternative is quite disorderly. Quote We do not have time for a meeting of the flat earth society. << Où sont mes amis ? Ils sont ici, ils sont ici... >>
old_bold&cold Posted October 11, 2007 Author Report Posted October 11, 2007 I am sorry. I did find this after you said and a yes I guess it was my bad, as I am working on a small screen laptop and yes I just did not scroll down enough to see this. Yes I do see them on the forums. It must be something where screen resolution can fix. Being older I tend to go with larger typefaces and and yes I guess if I use a higher resolution it will give me a better way to see all of the page. As I said this is my own bad and you are right I probably shoudl have taken more time to rad all the other threads before as starting this new one. It is that I seldom have need to come to this part of the site, but still, that is on me. Sorry to have bothered you. Quote
shavluk Posted October 11, 2007 Report Posted October 11, 2007 Well you are at it go to google and take the free spell check as it will then be easier for us reading you. Quote
guyser Posted October 11, 2007 Report Posted October 11, 2007 Well you are at it go to google and take the free spell check as it will then be easier for us reading you. Sorry , what was that about spell check? "Well you are at it.."? Fair enough I suppose, but how about you take an english class ? Quote
shavluk Posted October 11, 2007 Report Posted October 11, 2007 As soon as I can stop holding my breath and exhale with justice ,,,in Canada I will learn how to speak academia just like the factory programing some have been burdened with. Quote
Moxie Posted October 12, 2007 Report Posted October 12, 2007 Old it takes a big man to admit, oops I made a mistake. Job well done, perhaps you should take up POT according to the resident POT expert you will have 20/30 vision in no time. If that doesn't work, bifocals (worked wonders for moi). Joking about the POT expert, like twenty years of smoking that crap would leave a dram of grey matter. Quote Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy
GostHacked Posted October 18, 2007 Report Posted October 18, 2007 Old it takes a big man to admit, oops I made a mistake. Job well done, perhaps you should take up POT according to the resident POT expert you will have 20/30 vision in no time. If that doesn't work, bifocals (worked wonders for moi). Joking about the POT expert, like twenty years of smoking that crap would leave a dram of grey matter. I've been smoking pot for 10 years. My mind is in the best shape ever. Quote
scribblet Posted October 18, 2007 Report Posted October 18, 2007 Shavluk you do not like my view on things and that is just too bad. Just as you embarass yourself daily here with your drug rectoric, and why. What's 'drug rectoric' Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
guyser Posted October 19, 2007 Report Posted October 19, 2007 Joking about the POT expert, like twenty years of smoking that crap would leave a dram of grey matter. And you would know this how? Maybe you just smoked the bad stuff. Quote
capricorn Posted October 19, 2007 Report Posted October 19, 2007 I suddenly feel the impulse to sing "We are the World, We are the Children" la, la , la, la... Maybe it's because I had 3 beers and feeling mellow. Is that how it feels after you smoked a joint? I tend to think pot smokers and boozers may experience a similar euphoria so we may have something in common. Problem is one is legal the other not as much. My main concern is that whatever we indulge in, the public should not be endangered by our behaviour. Quote "We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers
AngusThermopyle Posted November 6, 2007 Report Posted November 6, 2007 I will learn how to speak academia just like the factory programing some have been burdened with. Here's an idea, why don't you take a stab at learning to speak English first? If that works out for you then you can try "academia". Quote I yam what I yam - Popeye
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.