-1=e^ipi

This is an interesting definition of rape. Are you suggesting that men and non-gender binary individuals cannot be raped?

One where consent to have sex = consent to have children for men, but consent to have sex != consent to have children for women. Heck, if a man is raped by a woman, and the woman chooses to have a child using the rape victim's sperm, the rape victim can end up sending child support to his rapist for the next 20 years. The existence of crazy people in a movement = movement is somehow legitimized. What kind of logic is that?

Oh I see how it is. You only care about this issue because it affects women and reduces the ability of women to be sexually pleasured by their partners. Why are you treating men like sex objects?

I'm very used to your willingness to label others racist for the most nonsense reasons. Suggesting that there is empirical evidence that suggests that nutrition affects cognitive ability is somehow racist. Just like criticizing Islamism is somehow racist I guess. Or criticizing affirmative action and wanting people to be equal under the law is racist. So, Jacee, do you take the position that nutrition has no affect on cognitive ability? If so, what do you think causes differences in cognitive ability (if you believe they exist)? Do you think that some creator goes around, waves a magic wand, and 'poof' you have differences in cognitive ability? The theory of evolution has received widespread criticism. The idea that the Earth isn't flat received widespread criticism. Given that there is a segment of the population that will dogmatically refuse to admit that cognitive differences between groups of humans exist regardless of evidence, there will always be 'widespread criticism'.

Definitions of feminism vary. I was referring to the subset of feminists that view feminism to mean gender egalitarianism. And gay people are able to reproduce with someone of the same gender? Asexuality is a sexual orientation, you bigot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexuality

Ability to have erections is an unnecessary luxury. Does it make sense to spend public money on this as opposed to helping first nations children that don't have good access to food or education?

These pronouns are immensely offensive to me! I suggest you educate yourself about gender neutral pronouns and use Xe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-specific_and_gender-neutral_pronouns I gave you lots of 'reactions'. But many of them were too long for you to take the time to read and respond to.

And you think that feminism has a single definition. How kawaii.

Just use google. It isn't that hard, omg. http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence#US_Black-White_gap Review articles by Rushton and Jensen (2005 and 2010) stated that in the United States, Blacks and Whites have been the subjects of the greatest number of studies. These studies have shown that the Black-White IQ difference is about 15 to 18 points or 1 to 1.1 standard deviations (SDs). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_Global_Inequality Lynn and Vanhanen (2006) accorded a national IQ of 69 to Nigeria on the basis of three samples (Fahrmeier, 1975; Ferron, 1965; Wober, 1969) It is white supremacist to suggest that nutrition affects IQ and using evidence in differences in IQ between African-Americans & Subsaharan-Africans, or North Koreans and South Koreans to help justify this claim? Is WestCoastRunner a White Supremacist too for also suggesting that nutrition affects cognitive ability?

Are you suggesting that there are no male feminists?

Yes. The term feminism isn't gender neutral enough and isn't very inclusive to males and gender non-binary individuals. In my view, if you prefer to be called a feminist over a gender-egalitarian, then you are not gender-egalitarian enough. Clear definitions do not suit the SJW Orwellian agenda. They need to be able to manipulate language at convenience in order to propagate their ideology.

There is rarely a single root cause to a problem. I think you should stop and ask yourself if confirmation bias has anything to do with this perception. Perhaps there appears to be a pattern because you start with a belief and then look for evidence to fit that belief. Or perhaps there is a pattern, but it is not as large as perceived and is amplified by confirmation bias. Many of your examples are 50+ years old; why did you have to look so far in time to find a sufficient number of examples? They should be prosecuted for misconduct. Shouldn't you look at crime rates on a per-capita basis? To be fair, I think that in our politically correct society, many, maybe even the majority, would view that hate crimes against whites simply can't exist by definition. Much like how many view that men cannot be raped by definition (the USA excludes forced penetration from the definition of rape) and as a result the rape statistics are skewed. I'm not saying black Canadians aren't disproportionately the victims of hate crimes, but you should be a bit skeptical. Two things to consider: 1. You should like at criminals per capita, otherwise the countries that appear high on the list will generally be countries with very large populations. 2. Some countries tend to have worse rule of law so criminals are more likely to get away with crime and less likely to be imprisoned. Also, with respect to Swedish rape rates, Sweden used to have a very low rape rate until they started mass immigration from Muslim majority countries. Btw, I think Freddy is trolling this thread.

So are you saying that West-Africans don't on average have lower cognitive performance than African-Americans, or that North Koreans don't have on average lower cognitive performance than South Koreans?

I'm sorry for suggesting that observed cognitive differences are more due to nutrition than genetics. Would you prefer I change my view?

Now if only they could get rid of blasphemy laws.

You are probably facilitating 'Rape Culture' with this comment or something. Clearly, we need more mandatory university classes to teach men not to rape to solve this issue!

They probably don't recognize the existence of matriarchal societies. It doesn't agree with their 'The Patriarchy' narrative.

Fortunately, the SJW have infiltrated the media and they will make sure that information is correctly filtered to the public so that wrong conclusions & opinions cannot be made. Look forward to that.

I haven't because I have never been drunk, nor do I intend to. What is so enjoyable about reducing your cognitive ability and damaging your brain and liver?

A lot of economic theories tend to break down in conditions of extreme poverty. Good nutrition is very important for cognitive development. Comparing North Koreans with South Koreans demonstrates this. Although I do question why stop at children. Perhaps we need a universal guaranteed income so that all individuals can afford good nutrition regardless of their economic circumstances. I question whether it is mostly genetics. There are huge differences in cognitive performance between North Koreans and South Koreans, or between African-Americans and people currently living in West-Africa (I think the average IQ in Africa is ~70 where as the average IQ of African-Americans is ~85).

I just have to wait nearly a year to be seen by a neurologist for post-concussion syndrome & brain-damage. My grandfather had to wait a year for a knee operation and was left basically immobile for a year. Heck, I was at a hair dresser today and some stranger was going on about how their father would be dead to pancreatic cancer due to wait times if they didn't get treatment in the United States. Our health care system is a complete joke.

Both women and men have agency in creating the world we currently live in. Neither gender is entirely to blame. That's silly. There are plenty of women that support men's rights. Example: Honey Badger Brigade. This is exactly what we are seeing with MGTOW and Soshoku-danshi. I certainly have no desire to have a family, date, marry, have sex, etc. I plan to remain a virgin forever. Although this may be due to being asexual; though my asexuality may have been induced based on the crazy environment in which I have been raised.

Wait, WestCoastRunner is showing concern for a male issue? What upsidedown alternate reality have I entered? The issues of penile-prosthesis and breast-reconstruction seem like unnecessary cosmetic surgery. Arguably, encouraging men to obtain penile-prostheses probably reinforces rape culture or something.

I predict that unless another Islamist attack occurs (like we saw last year on parliament hill), the NDP will win.

Except the NDP want to bring in proportional representation. So such a 2 party system will not last very long. Except your version of 'lift up groups' involves institutionalized sexism and racism, and creating scapegoats out of demographic groups that had nothing to do with the problems they are associated (except via some bizarre concept of morality comparable to original sin).