It would appear to me you are having a discussion with a person who has a closed mind on the topic. Apparently his anecdotal experiences extend to all in his mind.
In a number of jurisdictions here in Canada contract impasses in the public service are settled through interest arbitration in lieu of the strike/lockout model available to private sector employees. I am still waiting for this Shady fellow to provide authoritative reference material to support his claim. In the absence of such proof I will reject his position and consider that he is engaging in hyperbole.
You keeping on saying FDR was against public sector unions. I would like you to produce a reliable source.
Logic isn't one of your stronger points.
By the way where do you live?
You do realize that the business tax is to be reduced to the tune of many of millions of dollars while at the same time the working folks(middle class) are having their pay and benefits cut.
How do you reconcile such conduct?
Secondly the Governor did not campaign on the premise that he would be removing collective bargaining rights if elected.
How many buisnesses do the Koch brothers own in Wisconsin and how much did their contribution to the Governor's campaign bear on the changes the Governor is attempting to ram through?
By these states I take it you are referring to the 5 states cited in the article. What are the poverty levels in those states relative to those in the so called rust belt states?
I have already been reported as someone took exception to my use of the word pinhead. I have had a chance to review the rules and guidelines and alas I may have breached the outline provided. Here is a link which may be of interest and is related to the subject heading.
http://www.islammemo.cc/hadath-el-saa/Entefadat-Masr/2011/02/21/117682.html?lang=en-us
You overlooked the responses from the other poster. Don't think I am prepared to cater to your posting preferences. If I have something to say I will say it. If you don't like it scroll on by.
It should be obvious to you if you are aware of the state of the law. Apparently, in your confusion, you are unable to accept the current legal landscape.