CANADIEN

I am not good, I am not God, and I already had lunch. Now, in case you have forgotten (which is very likely) you advocate policies that would treat French-speaking Canadians as inferior by denying them equal rights. And your constant harping that WHITE, CHRISTIAN English-speakers (and "their" jobs) need to be protected against (non-existant) threats leaves little to the imagination as to what status you want for those who fall outside of these three groups.

And you simply want your municipal, provincial and federal governments to oppress French-speaking Canadians. I stand corrected... and you stand in support of oppression.

By your own definition, then, english is not the, or an, national language of Canada.

You know, one of these days you will have to provide an ENGLISH translation to terms such as "free-flowing bilngualism". That being said, the demonstration has been made that there are precedents to the current policy of official bilingualism. I thought that (according to you) pre-Confederation examples of an official status for the French languages were nothing more than cases of translation services being offered. BTW, let's be confused here. YOU are the one who wants one, and only one language, to be made official, who wants that lnaguage to be the only one permitted on commercial signs, who has advocated that an English equivalent of Quebec's language laws be adopted in Ontario. To follow YOUR definition, YOU, and only YOU, advocates what YOU call racist language policies.

The fact that there is no policy aiming at the decline of any group in our country aside, what part of`"I don't care about a person`s skin colour" is too complicated for you to grasp? Thanks for PROVING right from the start that 1) there is no anti-white genocide 2) you don't know what you are talking about

I have enough common sense not to care about the color's of one skin. But not to worry... there are some people who think like you. You claim there is a genocide program against Whites. Feel free to offer PROOF - I am sure it will be very entertaining.

Everybody? Really? Hearing voices? The obvious truth is that the program exists only in your imagination.

Indeed, I missed all those privatisations and tax cuts done by the NDP when they were in powers about 20 years ago. More seriously, if you, unlike about any political commentator who has written about them, thinkl that the ADQ is left-wing, methink it's up to YOU to bring their voting patterns to the table.

ADQ about as right-wing as Layton? Really? I didn't know the NDP platform included scaling back the number of civil servants, more private health care, rising university tuitions, lower taxes, school vouchers or flat rate taxation

Sharia encompasses more than ways of dealing with women, including rules on bamking and contracts, religious practices, and criminal justice. The punishments you propose are in law books all over the Muslim world.

I don't know... In the one I know, the gay parade is a fairly delimited part of downtown... Perhaps in yours it extends into Scarborough, North York, etobicoke...

Nope

Including those who reject what Jesus stood for - bringing a Kingdom of Justice and Love (as opposed to hatred and bigotry). Right?

We are still waiting for the film to be aired, btw.

Don't assume your own lack of ethics is shared by others. And it has been pointed out again and again, their right to protest and display their images has not been denied. What is stake here, despite your repeating the contrary, is the how and the exact location of their display.

Like in... Mind you, this is not about your view of Islam as much as the fact you wonder about what i think about a certain issue, in a thread when I said exactly what I think about it about a dozen time. What i said is in this very thread you just joined. If you won't at least browse it before joining it, don't expect me to do your homework for you.

I have said before what I think of Quebec's language laws. Stick to islamophobia, will you?

We are still waiting to get the actual numbers from you. Instead we'll have the usual "you support honour killing" non-sense. There is nobody on the left that posts on this site. After all, nobody here has called for unfettered immigration. And you have numbers that prove it?

May be difficult, considering we have a government that won't even allow for a realiable data gathering as to where people come from (yep, that's one of the questions in the long form census).

Freedom of expression does not equate absolute freedom in the mode of expression. Carleton University hasrule about how groups can express themselves, and that group decided to ignore them. Their freedom of expression has not been infringed upon, or violated, no matter how much they scream otherwise.

Nah. His real problem is that he NEEDS for non-Christian non-English-speaking non-white people to be treated like inferior beings.

Including the type of one-language only government policies you are advocating. Thanks for admitting you want to oppress people :lol:

Yep, use of two languages in legislative debates and in court proceedings is equivalent to the use of a translation service.

Once again, you prove you didn't even have a clue about what you're writing, but I digress. As you know full well, I have said often often that I believe in equal rights for all Canadians that someone who has a clue (that is, someone other than you) would not have to ask that question. More importantly, English-speaking cultures in this great country of ours are under no threat, certainly not fromFrench-language signs outside of government offices or people having a conversation in French at Tim Horton's while on break. In other words, the banning of French (which is your real goal, we all know it) is even less needed that what the Quebec government has done. Nice though to see you would willingly imitate them (then of course deny that's what you're doing).

You mean besides the proof YOU provided when posting their rant? All the proof that is needed is right there.