CANADIEN

Not only is your claim that "soon the only thing students will know about our proud heritage is where the welfare office is" a fallacy, but that you consider that would be treasonous proves that you have no clue about the meaning of the term. No surprise you that you clamour for an authoritarian regime then say that you don't favour a dictatorship - you don't know what you're talking about.

Never mind that privitization usally does not improve service, and only produce marginal services. Oh well, but this is not about a better service, is it?

Nope. Parties who have been complicit in the dictatorship were banned. You don't see the difference, your problem. If it was treasonous or even borderline, it wouldn't be allowed. You do not know what you are talking about.

I have. And I have said often enough to strike-breakers they should be ashamed of themselves. I do not need references to baseball bats, or to lower myself to calling them scum.

How dare you blaming the banks, even when some of THEIR top people admit they did wrong?

Agreed. :angry:

Good, There is no need there to go after the provincial government for money, since we won't need it. right?

And so is my opinion.

Give US a break. What you admire in Franco is the bad side of him, the dictator side. We already have ministries of Education in all provinces, and that's sufficient. admit it, your only problem with that is that the curriculum mmaterial is not sufficiently bigoted to your taste. Along with a Franco-like regime, right?

Any scab deserves scorn. Anyone who advocates violence in labour disputes deserves even more of it, and anyonewho performs acts of vilence in labour disputes deserves unemployment, and jail.

You don't even know what I think of unions, you hypocrite and imbecile. Yes, it takes an hypocrit to whine "what about people who don't want to corss picket lines" and "there is no right to work" in the same sentence. It takes an imbecile to say that this issue has any similarity with segregation. Anybody who engages in something lawful should not be in put of physical harm for doing so. But let's be frank, shall we? As your imbecilistic reference to segregation proves aplenty, this is not about a right to work YOU say does not exist. It is about enabling employers to exploit workers. Have at least the intellectual honesty to admit it, will you? And if it were about workers being safe at work, you would not be advocating measures that make the workplace less safe of an environment. Bsides, if you knew what you are talking about (you are proving constantly that you don't), you would know I was talking about employer abuse not in the 19th century, but well into the 20th and, in same parts of the world with the kind of work standards you can only dream of, well into the 21th century. Enough time wasted with your idiocy. Ignored.

Now, let's quote YOU: Obviously, as YOU have demonstrated just above, GH did not use the word anyone. It is right there. In black and white. Either you lack the capacity to differentiate the words some and anyone, or your wilfully dishonest. So, there must be another person here using your monicker. Someone who venerates Franco, a dictator, and wishes we had leaders like him. Someone who has called for an authoritarian regime to ahem guide our youth. If I were you, I would demand that he stops using your screen name right here and now.

Then why are you questioning why certain organizations you hate are getting involved?

Of course, nothing to do with the greed and lack of moral compass amongst the corporate elite growing out of control. Nothing is the fault of the CEO who cuts corners, sign shady deals or invests recklessly. It is all about that most nefarious of evil-doers - the guy who has the AUDACITY to believe that he should be paid a decent wage for his work, along with fair working conditions. How DARE he?

Good idea. I'll go one step further, start with yourself. Troubling, indeed, especially when said rates are DOWN. Feel free to take the cure anytime. You are actually calling for an end to the Harper Government? Considering that the only thing communist left in China or Vietnam is the name of the party, and the fact they're dictatorship, looks like you could actually LIKE it there. I know I wouldn't.

Great idea. Care to demonstrate how it done by purifying yourself from your prejudice and pro-dictatorial tendencies?

That's not what he said. Logically, it would be a fallacy to argue that anyone who criticizes any aspect of homosexual life is homophobic or gay. But you are (homophobic, that is). You might have a better chance of convincing people to give credence to the little rent above if YOU were not calling for a dictatorship.

(...) and I have some Florida swamp property for anyone whpo buys that. Why are you? Apart from your well-known hatred for anything to the left of Genghis Khan, I mean.

Indeed. Historically, and it is a PROVEN facts, the exact same methods employed in the US Deep South to deal with equal rights "troublemakers", from the use of baseball bats by the police to arson to even murder were used to keep would-be unionists in place, by the same people, with the same complicity from police forces, elected officials, judges. And it is telling that the impetus on the latest war on worker's rights originated from the same area. Keep digging, and soon you'll be in China. The way they neutered unions there, you'll LOVE the working conditions. PS: What civil liberties are you talking about? There is no such thing as a right to work. You said it.

Interesting that the Sun article doesn't include a mention that the increasein positive public opinion about Canada in 2011 followed a DECREASE in the 2010 poll, the first one in all these polls (the first one was taken in 2005). Why didn't anybody wake me up when Ignatieff was our PM in 2009? from the CBC As for the dismissal of the Olympics as a factor, it just so happens that the country whose opinion climbed the most from 2010 to 2011 was South Africa... You know, the host country of the World Cup?

Correction. It's worse.

LOL touché about the date. That being said, the level of infringement on personal rights you mention it is not to the scale of what took place in Germany.

I wonder whtat is the most amazing. That you can write something so lacking in logic, or that you believe in it. Keep digging.

Mind you, he may have a point about segregation and "right to work". After all, Southern States, the most virulent pro-segregationist, are also at the forefront of the movement to protect a right that, according to him, does not exist.

I must say that the "a job is not a right but it is a right to be protected from unions" is priceless. Not as much as the "unions are similar to Jim Crow" line though.