CANADIEN

Did anyone said he was making that horrific murder up? Let's see. Nobody.

Conveniently, you forget the fact that the two individuals in question had been sentenced to 20 years in prison, and that they had been held after their sentenced had expired. And that they will be subjected to a five-year surveillance period.source As far as I am concerned, they should have been sentenced to life in the first place, but... you were saying again?

Are we talking about the same Kim Campbell who famously said that an election was not the right time to discuss serious business? The one whose campaign ran an ad mocking Jean Chrétien's facial features? The PCs lost the election because of Mulroney - they lost all of her seats except two because of her.

Any person who murders innocent people, especially children, in the name of a cause, is nothing but a vile terrorist and a coward. So is anyone who claims their cause justify such crime. The individuals who committed these heinous acts should be hunted and brought to justice. There cannot be, there should not be, and there will not be an escape for thi or these bastard(s). In caseyou had not figured it yet, you will be hard pressed to find people here who do not get the threat that terrorism poses. And in caseyou are tempted to do your usual Soviet-like pony trick, i agree with the PM of the Plaestian authority when he says: .Do YOU condemn all form of violence, or to be specific all terrorism?

Typical Mr C. Nothing of the sort was said, and you know it.

This is rather an example on how selectibe your anger is.

Indeed. Some people hate Canada so much that they want an authoritarian regime instead of our democratic institutions.

Radical Christians have already started attacking abortion clinics and murdering abortion killers. Now, you get back to us when you can demonstrate that all, or a majority of Muslims in Canada are terrorists. OK?

If I were a radical islamist, I would do my best to encourage you to keep talking. The more you speak, the more you are turning the important and serious issue of terrorism into a farce.

It is one thing to claim that a certain standard is wrong, or is inneficient, or will be too constly is one thing. To argue that it is some form of unwarranted government intrusion is just plain absurd. So is.. The fact thqat I oppose abortion aside... Choosing a brand of lightbulb or a particular type of toilet is quite a different issue from abortion. To continue or terminate a pregnancy is a life-altering decision for the baby, the mother, and often for other people as well. I am disappointed in you, quite frankly; I have been used to far better arguments from you, even when you are wrong.

Taking your talking points from those clowns at jihad.watch I see. Tell us, why is it you don't want the threat of right-wing extremism and terroism investigated? Don't worry, I don't expect any response from you other than you making a fool of yourself as usual claiming I support terrorism.

Now, if I were a certain person, I would make a fool of myself by claiming that you support right wing militia terrorism. Fortunately, I am not that person. But don't you agree that radicalisation and terrorist threat should be investigated and fought, no matter its source?

Peter King is a known supporter of a terorist organization, IRA. He was friendly with the man responsible for that terrorist organization, stayed in the home of the man responsble for authorizing each and every terrorist act in Belfast. In more recent year, he had defended a convicted IRA terrorist who had been arrested after living in the USA for 15 years. After 9/11, he insulted the memory of the iinocent civilian victims of his IRA terrorist buddies by arguing there was no parralel by the IRA and Al-Queada because the IRA had no attacked thue USA. The risk of homegrown terrorism should be investigated. In all its form, whoever the terrorists are and whatever their motivations are. No supporter of terrorism should be in charge of such investigations. Now, I fully expect that a certaim person here will make a fool of himself by claiming that I support extremism or terrorism. I expect that he will not realize that his Soviet-like tactics won't work. I fully expect that he will not realize that I value his opinion of me about as much as the opinion of a garbage can (with my apologies to garbage cans everywhere).

The influence of the Koch Bros. and other Union-busters on the Wisconsin Government IS part of the issue, no matter how some would like to convince us otherwise.

Mr. C., the friend of the poor.

Typical Mr C... Confonted over anti-Semite statements of yours? You claim you were just joking around Confronted over your love for Franco, a dictator, and your call for an authoritarian state (also known as a dictatorship)? You backpedal. Confronted over your call for a Christian theocracy? You claim this is just to expose (non-existing) supporters of Muslim theocracies Don't worry, I for one value your habit of playing dumb or distorting what other says every time your positions become undefensible. It provides good entertainment.

That would explain why, on Muslims like with most other topics, you don't know what you are talking about.

You realize of course that this practice (which, in case you are tempted to make a foul of yourself AGAIN by claiming otherwise, I abhor) is a ritual one, performed only at specific times, and most importantly is formed by the MINORITY Shiites. Which means... most Muslims don't do this.

I do not see it as fake. And it is not silly... it is actually a downright insult to the intelligence. We are talking about standards on how certain items in the house are made. That's right, ladies and gentlemen, STANDARDS. If one thinks that a given standard is innapropriate, is not working, etc. etc., that's one thing. But to claim , that they restrict choice, that they constitute an unwarranted government intrusions, that those who promote them are hypocrites because some also favour abortion choice... Frankly.

Nowhere near the levle lastmas was with stupid statements like "the strikers are anti-Cathlic". As for Ford,he will find a way to offer us a few gems as well.

Not one bit.

The big lie is the claim that this is about public sector unions only. Te weakening of public sector unions is mthe first step in weakening all unions and, ultimately, workers' rights and protection.

I was talking about municipal employees WE pay to provide advice to the Mayor. Not city councillors. If you do not the difference, stop talking about yet another thing you know nothing about. I am talking about the time when Mel Lastman was embarassing us every second time he opened his mouth. At least though, he wasn't a bully on top of that.

Freedom is being threatened because a Government CHOSEN BY THE PEOPLE adopts new energy efficient standards for household appliances and... the error... I can hardly say the word... lightbulbs. If that's what the Tea Party has to offer, long live coffee.