Shwa

Oka.

Good grief Dorothy, how is Oz? According to this Newsweek article fromn last year, less than a quarter of the 4 million whites have left South Africa in the last 15 years. Not last year, not over the past 5 years - over the past 15 years. It also shows that South Africa - the nation - isn't "driving a million of them out." It also shows lots of other "coloured" have left or are thinking of leaving. And there is no indication that white people are forbidden by any South African law or policy from immigrating there. Plus most white South Africans have chosen to stay there. Do you even know the slightest about Zimbabwe and their land reforms? If you want to talk about "land ownership outright based on race" discuss the 1930 "Land Apportionment Act." Yeah, "balancing things out" sounds about right. And I am saying that Mexico does not disallow qualified white people to immigrate there, including Americans, Canadians, Germans, Englishmen, etc. So white people can "flood" Mexico and often do during the winter. You are the guy with the hard on for "white people" as opposed to other racial/ethnic groups. Regardless of what your interest is, there are "white" Muslims and they can go to Mecca. Tonto called. He wants his country back. Many Jews are "white" and many Israelis are white, Christian and Muslim. If they Israelis advocate "multiculurism for white Christian countries" that is of little consequence to "white Christian countries." No double standard. So you have some special Wizard like skills that divine what "Japan" or "Black countries" actually want? I hardly think so. Did you ever consider that you are thinking about this all the wrong way? But you made the assertion about what Japan and Black countries want, so be my guest, prove it. Can't? Didn't think so. Well here's the thing Dorothy, the "white people" in all those countries you are whining about, are the ones that determined their immigration policies in the first place. Turks didn't decide what the immigration policy of Germany was going to be. Blacks didn't force the white Brits to set their immigration up they way they did. And the same thing applies to every single country you can name that is being - as you say - "flooded." So if would seem to me that the "white people" have self-determined that they want immigration from other colours, cultures, ethnicities, etc., and from the amount of intermarriage that is increasing every year, they don't mind making babies with all those non-whites either. There are no policies that state white people must only mate with non-whites. Thus, no genocide. Nope, not at all. The white population is free to choose as they wish - marry and make babies with whomever they wish, emmigrate where they want to and set policies according to their desires. I am "for" this for all the white people and every other colour of people on the face of the planet. Tonto called, he wants his country back. No one said that about the Netherlands or Belgium either. Naw, I think everyone should intermarry and make babies with everyone else, blacks, whites, yellows, browns, reds, purples. White countries are free to choose whatever they wish to do. If some of those white countries have chosen their own immigration policies, then perhaps you should take your beef up with them. I just agree with them. "Aunti Em" wants to visit with you again Dorothy. She is up by the nurses station at the front of the ward. I never said anything about making white people minorities through mass immigration, but I know who did: white people! Did you ever stop to think that your problem rests firmly with the white people themselves? If what you say turns out to be a "final solution" then it was designed and executed by the very people who it was designed for. And, as it has been mentioned once or twice here already: are you advocating for self-genocide?

You see? A little ESL and you would have picked up on the whole "Suspect theories based on circumstantial evidence" comment from earlier. You'll have to do better than that. A lot better in fact. Of course, if you do, they we can examine that the people whose DNA you are so hopefully referring to were likely black people from Africa or, if not black, a nice deep tanned shade of brown. Perhaps you are right. Let's have a look right now: This doesn't mean white people can't move there, just that some of them who left had safety concerns. Can you show me the South Africa law that bans white immigrants please? Pretty please? But this doesn't mean that white people can't immigrate to Zimbabwe, only that the previous farm owners who occupied prime farmland there due to racist government policies had it consfiscated back. You know, to balance things out a bit. But still, can you show me the immigration policy of Zimbabwe than bans white immigrants please? Can you show me the zero-tolerance policy that Mexico has for white illegals please? You know, come to think of it, maybe it was mere dramatic license for the cops to say, "He's heading for the border, we need to catch him before he gets into Mexico." You know, because it is so difficult for illegals. White people can be Muslims, I know a few of them. They're pretty cool people too. And, we are talking about skin colour, not churches because there are likely more non-white Christians by now anyways. If not now, pretty soon... You can be Jewish and white, my mother-in-law's family was and they were Danish and they could go to Israel, the only Jewish state that I know of. So far I mean... You mean mass immigration of white people specifically. Well, if your demographic data indicates anything, why would white people want to mass migrate from anywhere in the first place? Why? Agreed. Oh come on, why sooooo serious? Nobody is saying that we should, but nothing is preventing it from happening. Unless you can dig up a comprehensive set of immigration policies from enough African and Asian countries to prove it. No one is forcing those white women make babies with non-white men nor forcing those white men to make babies with non-white women. So... no genocide present. So...no genocide present. Wow, you actually heard "everybody?" That must have made your ears bleed. But lets say you didn't hear everybody at once, can you select a few of those 'everybody's" and maybe post their comments so we can see who you are listening to? Did someone say there was a race problem in the Netherlands and Belgium? Who said that? The BBC? Those cads! The only mention of "final solution" other than you-know-who, is from you. So there you go. And Auntie Em is the code for anti-psychotic. And they are paging you to come up to the nurses station there Dorothy, time for a visit with "Auntie Em."

If the court is satisfied that the witness is indeed who they say they are, then why does face covering matter? So the accused doesn't see them snickering or something? Or are you afraid that the witness will do the old switcheroo in the hallway with someone else prior to the trial? "Hey your honour, they all look alike to me, with their brown eyes and all." I saw we go back to getting everyone to swear on a 'stack of bibles' because that will take care of several problems at once.

Then I guess written witness statements or forensic evidence from a dead person are not admissable in court? Because written witness statements and forensic evidence from dead people don't literally have "faces" in the context you are trying to score points with. But wait! There's more... If you really want to get technical and pull out literal interpretations, ask yourself who really makes the accusations in "our judicial system" nowadays?

Kepley, Germany, Wilkie and Moon, under the guidance of Campbell - the best teams ever in the history of the CFL. Even when Wilkinson was playing like crap he was good. Sadly, even while Ray plays good he is still crap. I don't want to minimize the importance of the present configuration of health care in Canada as a practical example of your views, but I am more interested in the process by which you believe you "signed over" all your rights "by national consensus" as opposed to continuing to agree to be a participatory citizen of Canada, including all that it entails. It seems to me that an individual citizen's "rights" are subsumed to the larger context of our present liberal democractric process that gains your permission by the acts of your participation in it. In other words, you never had any "rights" - outside of those that were developed under the present processes for every citizen - and even these were never yours to give away or sign over. In fact, they were extended to you as a benefit for your continued participation as a citizen whenever your citizenship first started. So I see a troubling contradiction with the sentiment or belief that you "signed over" all your rights. I am hoping that you might be able to explain this contradiction - a very common one I hear from self professed Libertarians - this being a 'philosophical' discussion and all.

Actually you will find all sorts of views from across the political spectrum here, but mostly centrists, liberals by definition, even Shady. There are those that can argue the merits of what some might consider a radical view, but in the end, mostly everyone appears to care for their neighbour's well being as well as their own. A couple of nutters too, but they keep things fun on the slow days. Wait until you meet Mr. 'Sticky Shoes' Canada, hours of entertainment; he even created a special thread for people to feel free to hurl their insults toward him. A very kind and thoughful act of generosity. What I was waiting for was the 'STFU and go pump the oil' comment, which I think is a hilarious retort to the delicate Albertan Séparatiste sentiment.

The theory was lightly reported on the BBC. The theory was also picked up by white supremecists as a rallying point for claims of North American ancestry. By using the word 'also' I am implying 'in addition to' or 'as well.' This indicates a complex or compound thought regarding a particular subject. If you can't keep up, I suggest you post in the CBC news story comments section until you have practiced English enough to get the nuances of the language. Or maybe take English as a Second Language (ESL) training. If you are in Toronto, you'll have no trouble finding ESL classes. White people can go anywhere they want so long as they behave. There are white people in Black countries, Asian countries, Muslim countries, Jewish countries and even in Mexico. I know for a fact that there are white people in Mexico. So all is equal after all. There, don't you feel better now? I don't think you are as familiar or informed about Indians or Indian culture as you think you are. Did you know that Harry Smith aka'Jay Silverheels,' the guy who played Tonto in all those Lone Ranger serials, was a Mohawk lacrosse player from Six Nations before he got into acting? Cool eh? There is no genocide going on here. Those are my words. And there is no "destruction" of any white population. My words again. Any mention of genocide towards, or destruction of "white country" is purely your own. And I think you are confused. My point is that when everyone is the same colour of brown, colour will more or less cease to be an issue, which would free your mind of what must constitute a considerable amount of stress. Then, once your mind is not so occupied with these stressful delusions, you could put it to more positive uses. Like learning English for example.

What if the "someone accused" is blind? Would a burka matter then?

I was actually waiting for this!!

And while we do that, we launch a massive public awareness campaign. Which, since we have know about FASD "for decades" isn't odd that we haven't had such an awareness campaign already? Why is that do you think?

Are you kidding me? I was thinking the same thing of you... yesterday. I was wondering if someone had just showed you how to this brand new fangled internet thingy in the library with the rest of your therapy group from skid row.

A libertarian? Well that is different. My apologies then, I thought you were one of those because-my-grampappy-said conservatives. My mistake. I take all my Alberta insults back. Besides, I am an Eskimos fan and Iginla is one of the best and most underrated hockey players of all time... So I am wondering - since this seems to be a prevalent thought among libertarians - is exactly when did you "sign over all rights" or "accede to their healthcare monopoly?" As I see it you never really had a choice in the first place according to your your participation as a citizen of the country. It seems to me that this is about the same as - to take a page from B-C's book - someone complaining before the Court of the Queen's Bench that they weren't read their Miranda rights.

Figures the first thing you would refer to is pogey seeing how cow-pokin' is a seasonal occupation. Or are you one of those "dude" rancher types? Still dealing with yesterday's drool I see. Or, since you appear to have a fixation for men's asses, maybe it isn't a drool stain afterall. An Albertan with credit? Yeah, that is about all there is to give out there isn't that right? Good thing for you eh? Aw, a sentimental cowpoke by golly, trying to tug on those patriotic heartstrings with a military heritage moment. Now you got something to share at your hillbilly boys club show and tell. Don't forget to bring your GI Joe for dramatic effect! Well that would explain your breath problem, but, as they say, you are what you eat. I am betting you eat it right from the source too. It would also explain why you are dick.

Well lookie thar, more of yasterday's drool on yer shirt there cowpoke. Changing tunes are ya now? See the drool comment above. Oh gosh no, I usually don't give your type of dimwittery much time, but seeing your new here, I figured I'd be nice about it this once. Knowing what a true cowpoke would say is a natural ability of yours of course seeing how you easily bring your preoccupation with Svend Robinson's ass into the discussion. Still hiding out in your closet er... 'militia' are you?

Tories thinking with their heads now... Strippers, escorts should be added to job bank: Ottawa Hey, are we seeing a return of the "progressive" conservative? Diane Finley - you rock!

No, some Canadians think that Canada is the most "Multicultural" country on the planet.

Suspect theories based on circumstantial evidence used by white supremacist groups to claim North American ancestry. "Hmm..." Besides, the Solutreans were likely very brown, originating in North Africa and are not considered the ancestors of modern Europeans. Of course, this was all before anyone had even thought of the word "Europe." No, it doesn't explain why living conditions are poor on some Indian reserves. Have you actually ever been to an Indian reserve or taken even a cursory look at pre-Columbian Indian cultures? No? You should. Then you wouldn't look like such a maroon on Internet forums such as this. No, I am not suggesting anything of the kind, but nice try in attempting to place your nutbar delusions on me. You see I consider lots of healthy babies to be a good sign for the species so there is no 'wiping out' going on at all. Quite the opposite in fact. Agreed.

Agreed. I think we might find him one day 'floating along the river.' If you know what I mean.

There is evidence that aliens made the Nazca Lines many more thousands of years ago. Aliens are grey. Do they count as off-white? No? Drats. Then sauce for the goose... Yep. they had an infrastructure, an economy, a legal system, a health care system, etc. Or are you that ignorant? But people wanted to move to this country because of what the Indians built. Or did you miss those years of Canadian history? And lets not forget all those white women copulating with Blacks, Asians, Muslims, Jews, Mexicans and Indians and making all those brown babies. And let's not forget all those white men copulating with non-white women too. Pretty soon everyone will be more or less the same colour - doesn't that please you? Eventually everyone will have a nice tanned look so colour will be a thing of the past. At the expense of tanning salons mind you, but something will have to give. Agreed.

Not so, they have Dominic Leblanc in the wings.

Conversely, you can always tell an good old reformatory boy by yesterday's drool stains on their shirt. Riiiight. It is the government's fault for not having fines high enough to deter such action and force people to comply with the law. Or did you miss that in the OP? Said like a true cowpoke.

The shopkeeper and others were charged with assault and forcible confinement and they have pled not guilty. A citizen's arrest is one thing, vigilante justice is another. This is what the courts will decide as they ought.

I know, I know. The guy on Yonge said it was the special 'public property' type of nativity scene, not no stinking church or neighbourhood variety that anyone can do. I mean this guy was selling the good stuff. But it was Yonge Street afterall...

The Nativity scene is illegal? Dammit. I should have guessed when that guy popped out of the alley on Yonge St and whispered, "Psssst, buddy. Wanna buy a nativity scene?"