naomiglover

Any type of punishment, for selling property to anyone is wrong. I am not selective like you and will admit to any wrongs on any side. There are many stupid things the Palestinians do, but this does not change the fact that their land is being stolen from them. Like mentioned before, you can't use the 'selling property' excuse, since it's only a small fraction of all the land that has been stolen from them by force. Why do you defend these illegal settlements and occupation? I guess you're back-tracking and no longer care what the International Court (ICJ) has ruled, since you were taught that the ICJ finds the settlements in both the West Bank and East Jerusalem to be illegal.

Some have no shame in how far they will go in their dishonesty. Tell me Dancer, of all the illegal settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem (considered illegal by International Court of Justice) how many were sold by Palestinians to Jews and how much of it was confiscated and stolen by Israel?

People who riot? Fascinating. Tell me about this riot that occurred in New York City.

Who are these Muslims? Ever looked into their background? Are you talking about the person who you quoted who makes regular appearances on Foxnews? The token so-called Muslim guy who will do or say whatever they want so that he gets paid? I looked at his web site and he's a one man show. He doesn't even have a membership for his group. You are a bigot.

Are you talking about the Palestinians whose land is occupied and being stolen? The ones who live in an open air prison? What, exactly, do you do?

Newsflash to all bigots: America includes people who are Muslim. You're dripping with bigotry.

No. You're wrong. I am pointing out that Bonam, American Woman, you and other Israeli apologists condemn the killing of these settlers but do not condemn the killing of Palestinians. In fact, you have cheered on the killing of Palestinians. Why do you apologize for the killing of civilians?

The reports and the investigations from the Gaza attack have concluded that the IDF purposely killed civilians. There were celebrations in Israel and in New York after this happened. I don't find either heroic. Do you?

You contradicted yourself. First you say they weren't killed in the West Bank, then you say they were killed in the West Bank.

Where was there an apology for Arab terror? I have already said, in my first post, in the first line that the act is inexcusable. Why do you have problems reading? Pointing out that people like Bonam, American Woman and yourself should be the last people to be spokesmen for condemnation of killing of civilians due to your inability to condemn them across the board, is not apologizing for Arab terror.

Is this okay with you guys too?

These are the settlers that some of these Palestinians have to live with, on their land. Of course, Bonam and American Woman don't find a need to condemn it: You are a sick person if you don't find these acts to be wrong.

Pretty disgusting to celebrate killing people, isn't it? Wasn't there a huge rally in New York after Israel attacked Gaza and killed hundreds of civilians? Of course, the same thing happened in Israel. But of course you're okay with that, because you're a hasbara-bot. Your words would have meaning if you condemned Israel's attack on Gazans which left 1000 civilians dead. Many of these civilians were killed indiscriminately as it has been proved through many investigations and as it has been repeated by IDF soldiers. You're a bad person for being selective in your outrage for civilian deaths.

The killings is inexcusable even if they're occupiers who not only steal Palestinian land, but also engage in continuous abuse of Palestinians. What is also inexcusable is you jumping on the news of the killings while continuously, either trying to justify the multiple attacks and vandalism by settlers and the IDF towards the Palestinians or pretending it doesn't happen. You are a hasbara-bot. For your sake, I just hope that you're at least getting paid: The Foreign Ministry unveiled a new plan this week: Paying talkbackers to post pro-Israel responses on websites worldwide. A total of NIS 600,000 (roughly $150,000) will be earmarked to the establishment of an “Internet warfare” squad. The Foreign Ministry intends to hire young people who speak at least one language and who study communication, political science, or law – or alternately, Israelis with military experience gained at units dealing with information analysis. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3744516,00.html

In his status, Shady claims to be a 'Truth Detector'. In yours, you claim to dish out insults. Neither of you are delivering what you claim in your status. Another honourable mention goes to jbg and his 'Radical Leftist Lawyer' status.

Oh yes. Roger was such a pacifist and totally apolitical. Why is it so difficult for you to digest any criticism of Israel? Or accept anyone who criticize Israel? You're no better than Shady when you hold such an extreme and unconditional view of Israel.

Speaking of Pink Floyd, Roger Waters and "The Wall": Pink Floyd star lambastes Israel barrier “It fills me with horror,” Waters told reporters at the site. “You can see photographs of something like this, but until you’ve seen the actual edifice itself and seen what it’s doing to these communities ... It’s hard to comprehend that they could be doing this.” MSNBC

Not that having an actual mosque there should make a difference, but the image that you and others are trying to create here is wrong. This is not a mosque because it has a prayer room. It's a community centre. It won't even look like a mosque. When you try to pass yourself as an objective person, try to be a little more honest about the facts. I know you're trying to score credibility points by quoting a Muslim, but Zuhdi Jasser is not an expert on Muslims or a representative of Muslims, so his comments have very little weight. Especially since he has aligned himself with one of the most outspoken Islamophobes like Daniel Pipes by writing in his magazine. Re: Planning and foresight - The people behind the community centre are not affiliated or representatives of the people who flew planes into the towers. Why is this difficult to comprehend for you and the other ignorant people out there? Re: Imam Feisal - trying to associate him with terrorists and radicals only makes whoever that is trying to do it look like an idiot. Not only that but he was an adviser to the Bush administration. Re: Funds - How do you make the funds more transparent? Do you expect the same transparency with other organizations or just this one because they are Muslim? No one should feed those who are sensitive based on their ignorant and in many cases, bigoted views. Why should we feed it? Why do you want to feed it? Instead of succumbing to these illogical sensitivities, we should be addressing them with logic. The controversy, again, is based on illogical feelings. The people behind the community centre were not and had nothing to do with the attackers of 9/11. "They want to force Islam upon the American people"? by building a community centre with a prayer room? What rubbish. The Daily Show has done a good job in covering the absurdity of the latest hysteria: http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-august-16-2010/mosque-erade

I don't know about you, but I put DogsOnPorch on block over a month ago.

Or when Dancer references international law in certain topics but then he tries to justify Israel's violations of it.

I'm glad that we both oppose some of the European laws that throw people in prison for questioning the holocaust.

From when the European Jews decided to colonize their land. You have very little attention span. You keep going off on tangents. Like somehow the drops Abbas receives has anything to do with Egypt's part in the blockade. That's good. Don't be shy about displaying your ugly character. Another non-answer from Strawman Joe? That's from your version. I'm sure many right wing, extremist Zionists were cheering when Rabin was killed. Did you cheer for his death like you cheer for Rachel Corrie's death?

If you understood the answer, maybe you would stop asking. I am talking about the ideologies and agendas of the Zionism and Apartheid, which in a lot of ways, are the same. Zionism will be abolished like Apartheid was.

There is no going around. The Palestinians have always had their rights crushed from the beginning. I did not try to paint the PLO as the victim. I am telling you that the Palestinians have been a victim. A victim of the Zionist agenda and the victim of the supposed Arab friends whose governments prefer the money they receive than standing up for the Palestinians. I am stating facts. I don't care about your opinion and you shouldn't care about my opinion. I'll give you one chance to answer; which one of these parties has a prime minister leading a country? A) Likud Bloc Québécois He was an individual with his own motive. Much like the Jewish man who killed the prime minister of Israel. Your use of strawman has become quite the habit.

The fate of the Palestinians is what is at question here. For the Palestinians to experience freedom and the human rights that they deserve, the Zionist agenda will have to come to an end. The Israeli government would have to change its agenda to accommodate the Palestinian freedom and this will happen.