justme

"No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome." -- Winston Churchill Can you imagine what the reaction would be if a bunch of Christians yelled in the streets of Riyadh that Christianity will dominate in Saudi Arabia and made death threats to Muslims? Britain needs to grow a spine and kick these SOBs out, but they'll find refuge in marxistculturalism multiculturalism, and thus that is the greatest threat to the West. Geert Wilders is following Churchill's example by recognizing the threat, speaking out about it and refusing to give in, and he's gaining support, but unfortunately, there are too many Chamberlains around. "Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." -- Winston Churchill

Stop me if this sounds familiar: In Britain: The article includes 465 comments from people that are furious about this. In Australia: Sound like Statistics Canada? Again, this article has many comments by people that are furious about it. What's interesting is that the comments on these articles are actually allowed while most dissenting views on this subject in Canada are censored by Canadian media -- I know from experience. Multiculturalism, and political correctness that goes hand-in-hand with it, is actually Cultural Marxism, and no, I don't support that. I do not support politicians bringing in people for the purpose of creating voting blocks so that they can stay in power either. Therefore, without apology, I support immigration that gives higher priority to countries that are most similar to Canada -- this is what Australia does (at least until recently).

24,000 Canadians vs. how many millions of Mexicans? I guess it's too damn hot in Mexico.

I think the best description of paying for an aging population with immigration I heard was from an Australian who called it a ponzi scheme. He argued that eventually they'll age too, and as the population increases you'll face an even bigger problem. Given that Canada gives points for age to people up to 53 years of age, it probably won't take that long.

If they're so superior, why are their countries of origin still third world countries while Canada is a first world country? Enquiring minds want to know. Wait, let me guess, it's our fault right?

Family, education and individual responsibility. Gee, kinda sounds like a return to conservative values eh? The liberal social experiment is as much a mess as the party itself.

Mark Steyn is spot on about multiculturalism:

According to the CIA World Fact Book, 91.2% of Jamaica and 95% of Haiti is black. If not black countries, what would you call them? If you want to argue that Africa is any different, show us some evidence. It'll be interesting to see you do that when the evidence contradicts your argument: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzB8t5B__A0 Again, according to the CIA World Fact Book, Japan is 98.5% Japanese. If not Japanese, what would you call it? I could care a less about your mind; I care about facts. You talk of "skilled posters", yet you argue against easily verifiable facts and common knowledge. Rule #1 in a debate: never deny the obvious.

Again, way to dodge.

Of course if they aren't facts, you'd have no problem debunking what I said. Way to fail.

CBC, Globe & Mail, and for that matter, the Toronto Star, censor comments, and in CBC's case, they receive money from tax payers that they censor. I find it interesting that CBC censored people who opposed the demographic shift, yet saw fit to allow comments that threaten people that oppose it and comments that used profanity. This is typical behavior of multiculturalists however. They try to silence opposition to their views any way possible. As Noam Chomsky once said (far enough to the left for you?), being for free speech means being for another person's right to speech that you do not agree with. As long as racial slurs, profanity and threats are not being used, people should be free to express their views regardless of whether or not you agree with it. Personally, I think the word "racist" has been thrown around so much that it's akin to somebody being accused of being anti-semitic because they crticize the policy of the Israeli government. When you do that, the meaning of the word gets watered down.

I've already pointed out facts: 1) The white population is declining in all countries with white majorities (must not call them white countries even though it's ok to call black countries black, asian countries asian or muslim countries muslim). 2) Black people are treating white people worse in black countries than vice versa. Nearly a million white people have left South Africa due to safety concerns and most have already been driven out of Zimbabwe while on the other hand, the president of the US is half black, and countries with white majorities are helping people in Haiti. 3) Countries with white majorities are taking in large numbers of non-whites, but non-white countries remain virtually homogeneous. How many non-japanese are in Japan (second largest economy in the world)? How many non-chinese is China taking in (with its red hot economy)? 4) In the Middle East, people face persecution if they're not Muslims. It is a crime simply to enter Mecca if you're not a Muslim. There are thousands of mosques in non-Muslim countries, but how many churches are there in Saudi Arabia? These are irrefutable facts and that is why you brush them off instead of debating it. Some black people actually believe that the west manipulated the weather to create the earthquake in Haiti: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaaGsiRopGU&feature=response_watch Here's a black man on C-SPAN calling for the extermination of white people: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN5StQAr7n0&feature=related

Guess that's all you can come up with when faced with uncomfortable facts.

I wouldn't call Jane/Finch or St. James Town paradise either, and let's not forget about Air India or the Toronto 18.

All countries with White majorities are supposed to be for everyone, heck you probably believe that it's racist to have a white majority in England, but most non-white countries are virtually homogeneous. You're a big advocate of double-standards are you? Another thing, there are plenty of countries that are called Muslim countries, where you're basically treated like a second class citizen if you're not a Muslim, but how many countries are referred to as Christian countries?

It's the result of years of brainwashing that's akin to the fact that many Canadians think that our national healthcare system should be a source of national pride and a model for the world to follow.

Well most people disagree with you on that.

According to Statistics Canada, between 2001-2006, the South Asian population in Brampton more than doubled while the white population decreased by nearly 10,000. Do you know of any place in Canada where the European or Australian population doubled?

It's based on the information released by statistics Canada that is the subject of this thread and on every news site. In other words, people read/watch video about the demographic shift and it asks if they're ok with it. The overwhelming majority said no. And to be honest with you, given that I live in the GTA, I got a good laugh out of what you said.

Something undesirable about an individual? No. Something undesirable about a huge demographic shift? Yes. Oh there's plenty of evidence, just you don't agree that it is a looming disaster, but I bet that if it happened to these immigrants in their countries of origin they'd consider it such. Gee, I can't find the connection either. Could it have anything to do with the fact that most the immigration is coming from non-white countries? I don't know.

I've heard quite a few stories about people from Europe and Australia having problems immigrating to Canada, yet the South Asian population is exploding.

Actually, according to a poll on the CTV web site, 79% say that the immigration policy is too open. Perhaps it is you that should not speak for others.

I read that too, and the sad thing is that there are plenty of people that have been brainwashed for so long that they'll probably accept it without question. As it stands already, we have the liberal Toronto Star admitting that the Liberal politicians allowed Sri Lankans to get away with things that they shouldn't have because they depend on their votes in key ridings. What will happen as the polulation increases? Increased demand to get Canada involved in things that are not in Canadian interest? No thanks. And yes, even though black countries are for blacks, Japan for japanese, China for Chinese, India for Indians, white countries are for everyone or you're racist! Forget about the fact that nearly a million white people have been forced to leave South Africa out of fear for their safety, tens of thousands have been killed and many more have been robbed and/or raped. It's ok to have growing Muslim populations in non-Muslim countries, but absolutely not acceptable to have a growing non-Muslim population in Muslim countries. Build mosques all over lands that have been traditionally Christian, but building a church on Muslim land? Yeah, right.... I know that it's only a matter of time before someone argues that the indians were in north america first, even though it was primarily european settlers that made it what it is today. Put that aside, what about Great Britain, France or Germany? There's not a country on this planet where white people aren't shrinking as a percentage of the population, and we're supposed to celebrate that or we're racist. Race shouldn't matter, we're told, yet it does in every country that doesn't have a white majority. I'll accept multiculturalism and diversity when I see reciprocity.

More accurately, the third world population.

Bringing the equipment up to date and maintaining a military budget of 2% GDP (NATO standard) is reasonable and less than half of what the Americans spend. If the bill seems large, that's what you get for kicking the can down the road.