Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

G Huxley

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,341

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by G Huxley

  1. G Huxley
    The 'moderation' of the board reflects bias and stifles freedom of expression. Since this board purports to represent Canada it sets a terrible example to be so anti-free speech especially since it is associated with a publicly funded University, which should not be biased.
  2. G Huxley
    "But it's not like intolerance of freedom of speech is a new phenomenon at Canadian Universities." Like the University of Lethbridge. I agree with the theory at the beginning of the thread. In fact I have come to think of this recently independently.
  3. G Huxley
    No idea why my post was moved here. I had a subject title that was not the same as this thread and puts it in a different context.
  4. G Huxley
    Cybercoma all threads are meme wars whether it's text or images. Images are just a different way of expressing oneself and in my opinion are a more powerful medium as they say a picture says a thousand words. So if you can save a thousand words with one zen-like picture that says it all actually you are using up less space.
  5. G Huxley
    I consider over population to be the worst problem in our time. The rest is really a side show. This planet is becoming that Star Trek episode: The Mark of Gideon.
  6. G Huxley
    "The picture was taken down because it was a waste of space." Yes Herr Charles the arbiter of what is and isn't a waste of virtual space. (What shows your fellow right wingers for what they are). Are you this humourless in real life too?
  7. G Huxley
    The Flintstones picture was a direct reference to Stockwell Day's belief in the cohabitation of humans with dinosaurs. How could that possibly discredit me? It was obviously used to discredit Stockwell Day and his party.
  8. G Huxley
    haha Charles deleted a photo of the Flinstones. As usual he shows his complete lack of humour whatsoever and personal right wing bias.
  9. G Huxley
    Sorry Segno the Greens are a thousand times ahead of the conservative science deniers when it comes to science. Greens global warming is a reality: Conservatives (fire the scientists so the public can't make an informed decision) Greens Evolution is a reality: Stockwell Day: 'There is Scientific Evidence that man Co-habitated with dinosaurs' I mean when you get to that level it's time to just pack up shop and just give up the charade.
  10. G Huxley
    Stockwell Day who ran for the conservative party's antecessor's PM post actually is on the record for saying that Humankind Co-habited with Dinosaurs. If you consider your party scientific scientific after that, you might as well do yourself a favour and prove Darwin's theory.
  11. G Huxley
    ipi: If one of those cesium particles gets in the bones it can cause leukemia. Segno: I also fully support the Greens. Anti-nuclear and organic are not anti-science positions. Both positions are scientific. Nuclear energy causes massive amounts of nuclear waste, which costs millions and millions in the future. So it is not cheap energy in the long run. And non organic food is more likely to cause cancer. If you don't believe that you're a fool. It's your party that's anti-scientific. For example I know a guy whose job it was to drill ice cores in the arctic, but Harper eliminated all ice core drilling jobs in Canada. Why? to prevent science from being undertaken and known.
  12. G Huxley
    -1=e^ipiThe probability is pretty good it's in the damned water.
  13. G Huxley
    Agreed with that Gost. It's either Neoconservatism or Neoliberalism with the other parties.
  14. G Huxley
    As in it's completely not understandable. The sentences don't even make structural sense. "So, I admit I blindly talk too much for a blindness." Man look in the mirror you are coming across as delusional. If you can't communicate your thoughts effectively and have them make logical sense, then it's not that other people are blind, but rather that you need to really take another look at your beliefs or develop better ways to clearly elucidate them.
  15. G Huxley
    Man I live on the west coast there's cesium in the water now. I could die of leukemia due to you pro nuclear folks.
  16. G Huxley
    "Darwin made a theory of evolution on some facts, and these facts were recorded the creative process of the aliens in another universe. " Do you think this is not a connection?" No it doesn't make any sense at all man.
  17. G Huxley
    "Is this expression clear enough for you as a possibility?" You lost me at the Darwin space alien connection. "Only far left liberals take evolution as a given or think it is "fact" when it is at best a theory far from ever being proven." No it's proven. You just haven't taken a good observative look around you. Ever eaten genetically modified foods? If yes you just proved evolutionary theory. "It claims matter literally appeared out of nothing." No it doesn't. Evolutionary theory makes no such claim. I should get paid to explain this stuff seriously.
  18. G Huxley
    Darwin just made a theory about evolution, not about the possible existence of intelligent space aliens from another universe.
  19. G Huxley
    Yes
  20. G Huxley
    Sure.
  21. G Huxley
    Sure.
  22. G Huxley
    Your post is too vague for my understanding.
  23. G Huxley
    What do you consider to be the "real relation between creation and evolution"?
  24. G Huxley
    Yes it is, but the paradox is that he also denies science at the same time. So he applies science and accepts it's merits but then denies it at the same time.
  25. G Huxley
    If science is crucial for Carson why does he deny it?
×
×
  • Create New...