bjre

China did never invade, the king of Tibet invaded China, and after he failed, the king gave his land to China, and China Emperor assigned him as the king of that area and marry him with one of princesses.

That is the common sense in China. like we need eat and sleep each day.

After all Americas return to aboriginals, and Australia return to their natives, and many others place robbed by colonist return to its native people. By the way, most people in Tibet, Xinjiang loves in China, only the very small part supported by CIA don't. And Han never kill native more than 90% of people like European colonist did, and all the wars between Han and others were launched by the other side, Han always defend first, like built long walls. The reason why Han becomes larger in the history is others find Han's peaceful idea is actually good for them so that more and more nations can live better life by become part of Han, that is the reason why there are so large difference even inside Han. Tolerance to others, no matter behaviour, religion, habit, and others, that idea is in Han's book thousand years ago. Han didn't know what is freedom because they never lack of it, Han did not know what is democracy because they were satisfy with their own living style and never feel they need it. Unlike western culture which believe kill people who trust a different god. And use state machine to bully inside family issues (that is so called freedom?). Han is the real peace loving people in the world, unlike your western politicians, talking peace always with armed forces send to other countries and with mass killing such as what they did in Iraq and Afganistan. the only description suitable for them is hypocrisy evils.

No, you are still try to hide it by trying to make the number smaller. And Europeans still did not return the land they robbed from native people. Innocent people dead in Iraq and Afghanistan will be more than a million, how did you correct it? But the next "elected" guy are just same type that supported by powerful large business. But why no one have ever seen the piled up bodies during the Great Leap Forward? Mao is the greatest leader that make your leaders unable to keep killing and slave people in China. He make it by drive all colonist out of China and drive them from China-Korea border to the 38 line. Your democracy is limited by brain-washing corporate controlled media that make you unable to know what is truth. And you will only waste time if you vote a person not among those pre-chosen for you by big-business. Your liberties is limited by the amount of money you have. Your free expression is limited in non-main-stream media unless you talk about what corporate controlled media like to use. Actually, the word hypocrite is just fit for you when you asked me to go back to China when I have a different idea when you claim you like democracy.

The idea "shooting them, arresting them and making them disappear" is yours, who claimed support democracy and just can not live with different opinion. And "shooting them, arresting them and making them disappear" remind me the way westerners deal with aboriginals. If you don't aimed to make profit from democracy, then democracy to you is only another religion when you actually don't know you should respect different ideas if you truly understand what is democracy. Otherwise, you are just another dictator in name of "democracy".

While it's possible to invent a system where the individual's rights are cared for without their direct say, it's difficult. There were good Kings and Queens of England, and bad ones but - IMO - people fared better when there was a mere piece of paper dictating their rights to elect, and express themselves. You forget the sentence that follows what you quoted. So what I really meaning is add a condition for pursue happiness. And not emphasis democracy. And I completely support the value for freedom speaking. And my opinion that you have ignored again and again is "think of others, care about others, help others" is more important than democracy. If everyone have been educated to be that, no one need to fight for right for themselves as same as fight evils. Is every other person evil under the assumption of democracy? If that is correct, are you guys evils? Why others need use democracy to fight for their interest against you guys? Why you can not think of a fair solution that make them satisfy before they try to execute their right and protest for it sometimes with violence?

CAS is one of the examples that shows western democracy is a lie. Democracy don't solve powerful controls vote problem, even that problem be solved, it can not solve the problem that it enable majority bully minority even pass laws to kill minority.

Include the history that 100 million aboriginals have been killed in Americas by westerners.

Keep lying, you didn't make it more look like a truth because there are already so huge amount of lies on this everywhere.

Read the novel "Gone with the wind", there are many loyal slaves there.

You said: "Of course, that's a loyal slave's response." When you talk about a slaves, your first intention was not to free them, your instinct was look down upon them. That is the reason I think you don't respect slave's hard work.

Of course, you don't respect hard work that feed people like you. You want take more advantage to take more wealth by "democracy" and "laws" for yourself so that you can enjoy happy life without work, am I right?

Lies, has something to do with CIA of course.

Mao is not a mass killer. There are many mass killer among westerners. I don't remember if I have heard that Hitler was elected. If there were so many starved to death at that time, that would be one of every 10 or one of every 100, there would be dead body everywhere. No one actually see that. The lie were made up by westerners. That is not an argument. I am not loathe democracy. I think current western "democracy" is a lie. And even if it becomes true, there are still problems. Make people more selfish is just one of them.

Having a nation that is based on the right of the individual to pursue happiness is selfish ? I suppose, if you think so then having a population of slaves is akin to having a country of selfless and admirable people. As they used to say, the poor get their reward in heaven. What's the point of a country if not to allow people to pursue their lives as they would like ? To let them have a say ? Right, to serve the Emperor. No, I did not say that. The idea that come to my mind recently is democracy maybe is the reason that makes people selfish. It is unnecessary for you to met me if just for understand what I think. I don't suggest to take away the right of the individual to pursue happiness. I think it will be better not emphasis that. The better thing to emphasis is thinking of others, care about others, help others, work hard to pursue happiness instead of pursue happiness with evil methods. What most people think about pursue happiness is better with their own hands, and by selfless help from others, so that more wealth will be created, life will be improved fast. When more people thinks more about pursue happiness by fighting through democracy, rob from others with laws, protest, and others, less wealth will be created. Democracy makes government thinks more about himself instead of the people of the city:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-trashes-superbug-report-says-its-doctored/articleshow/6301982.cms India trashes 'superbug' report, says it's doctored CHENNAI: A day after the Lancet report on drug-resistant 'superbug' NDM-1 created a global scare, India has hit out at the study, which it said was funded by pharma companies that make antibiotics to treat such cases. While the Union health ministry issued a statement on Thursday which also takes offence to the naming of the bug after the national capital, the paper's Chennai-based lead author Karthikeyan Kumarasamy dissociated himself from parts of the report. "The study was funded by the European Union and two pharmaceutical companies, Wellcome Trust and Wyeth, which produce antibiotics for treatment of such cases. It also needs to be highlighted that several of the authors have declared conflict of interest in the publication," the health ministry said. Doctors have criticised the report, saying it appeared to be aimed at hitting at India's booming medical tourism that was taking away business from the West.

Maybe westerners also free aboriginals so that most of them be killed in Americas. Maybe westerners also free Africans by catching them from home and sell them to America. And then, add some "research result" the make up history and say they killed each other before westerners come and free them. How respectable. Westerners are just the god. They seems always enjoy forgetting they themselves killed each other inside Europe and outside Europe just for profit. Why Saddam attacked Iran, isn't US ask him to do that and provide him WMD?

They freed Iraqis. How about the life in Iraq now, better than Saddam's time?

If only more Canadians can have constructive ideas like this, Canada would become hopeful.

Actually, now I become think maybe democracy is the reason people becomes selfish. Because democracy ask everyone fight for themselves. If you don't fight for yourself, no one is suppose to help you. Just like if you don't apply for welfare when you need, the government don't give you anything. But when you forget to pay tax, government will charge you. This value system will encourage people try to take more without pay hard work. Any hard work people who did not spend time in thinking and fighting for themselves (which create no value to society) becomes only losers.

That is because many Chinese have changed after western culture invade China with information in western movies and news and others for many years. Many Chinese become selfish after they accept western thinking. In Mao's time, most people think others first. The recent school attacks in China are done by people outside the schools that is beyond schools and teachers can affect. Those people and the people who unfairly treated them become selfish because western culture and western value invade. Here in Canada we are facing more violence between kids that under directly educating by the schools and teachers and the education system for years.

Google has already becomes a source of corporate controlled misleading information now. When you type sky in Chinese, it popup "Tiananmen 1989" at beginning. When you type law in Chinese, it popup "Falungong" at beginning. It is the biggest source of western propaganda now where full of lies and misleadings. It gives out nothing but crap on any China topic.

China is not a police state as here in Canada. From I was in kindergarten to I left school with a Master's degree, I have no memory if I saw a police inside any of a school. Police to me is only some people conduct traffic in the street or someone who sitting in offices with uniform. And they don't have so many laws to out-law so many behaviours. They encourage people catch thief themselves, they encourage people fight with criminal themselves, unlike Canada, cops charge shop owner who catch a thief. Cops arrest people who have a different thinking on how to educate their kids. Cops go and tell resident their dog bark 10 minutes earlier than 9 o'clock, cops lock kids who show his ID too fast in school. Ya, only Europeans can have that large population at that time. Did Canada return the land to them and all Europeans return to Europe and apply for immigration after the aboriginal people found their own country? China need not apologize for other people's lies.

1. You bring this irrelevant topic again when you can not find any persuasive argument on the topic again. 2. What you said is totally a baseless lie. 3. The truth we can find is that on the other hand, European invaders slaughtered millions of native inhabitants. The indigenous population of the Americas plummeted from 100 million at the time of Columbus' arrival to just three million 150 years later. They executed an aboriginal every 10 minutes. 4. Thousands kids were killed in residential schools. That's what Canada did.

And real police work can be much dangerous than bulling kids.