Jump to content

tango

Member
  • Posts

    1,641
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tango

  1. These kinds of semantics are not helpful to the discussion. Who cares what natives are called, so long as we are respectful about it....

    Many Europeans are not aboriginal to their place of birth, just like Canadians. However, there are aboriginal people among the Europeans...Friesians and Scots come to mind.....

    The Friesians prize their language and descent from the ancient Friesian people

    http://www.everyculture.com/Ma-Ni/The-Netherlands.html

    Thanks for solving a riddle for me.

    Scot ... not so sure

    While the Latin word Scoti[17] originally applied to a particular, 5th century, Gaelic tribe that inhabited Ireland[18][dubious – discuss] and later in history became confused with the Gaelic language until the 15th century.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_people

    And here

    http://books.google.ca/books?id=kgLOAAAAMA...els&f=false

    it says the Scots (vagabonds) were an amalgamation of the Cymric Picts and Dalriadic Gaels (Ireland).

    I agree respectful is the key.

    b-c took issue with the words in an article I posted.

    I think I'm a Gael. :D

  2. However Omar became like he is, there's no way of changing him back to an innocent young man who loves western culture and values. he's a mad-dog fundamentalist who hates the West.

    Really Argus?

    Can you provide a link to verify that those are Omar's feelings?

  3. People who were not born here should not be allowed to vote under any circumstances from now on. Voting should be a privilege for real Canadians only. Coming here on a plane 2 years ago doesn't give a person enough knowledge of my country to be able to decide my fate.

    I wouldn't be allowed to vote in the desert country or the jungle country so why should they be allowed to vote here?

    What about your ancestors, Mr Can?

    Did they get to vote?

    Why should new immigrants not get to partake in democracy, when old ones did?

    What you want to do is destroy democracy, imo.

  4. That's just fine....but I can see that you still don't get it. Such offensive terms (including "indigenous") only reflect the larger barriers and conflict. If you truly want people to listen....start here.

    Or at least be fair about it and refer to the "whites" as "boat people". :lol:

    Well I'll take their advice about what to call them before yours, b-c, and Indigenous Peoples, Nations or people it is.

    The irony of Canada is that we accept refugee Indigenous people from other countries, pushed off their land by corporations and corrupt colonial governments. Meanwhile we do the same thing to Indigenous people of Canada (Kanata).

    Indigenous Peoples have international organizations and common causes so it makes sense to me that in Canada too, they want to identify themselves as such.

  5. Maybe it's just me, but it would be far easier to take your post seriously if you hadn't invoked the offensive term "Aboriginal" and any of it's derivatives. Like another silly term used in Canada ("visible minority"), the term "aboriginal" is loaded with racist context, judgement, conflict, and assumed superiority.

    Do we call Europeans "aboriginals" in France or Germany?

    I totally agree, and that's why I refer to them as Indigenous Peoples.

    The article I quoted uses Aboriginal, and that's because the Canadian government has chosen to use that word: Sec 35 "Existing Aboriginal rights are hereby recognized and affirmed".

    I believe the government uses 'Aboriginal" to try to separate Canada's Indigenous Peoples from the worldwide movement - eg, at the UN - to prevent them from organizing successfully.

    Canada's Indigenous people are supposed to think they are better off and don't need to be activists. (sick joke)

    Canada has always tried to suppress the rights and activism of Indigenous Peoples:

    “First Nations is interesting. There’s very, very little written on First Nations human rights activism. There’s this weird period between 1910 and 1969 where First Nations were not terribly politically active.”

    You might wonder why this might be the case. And unless you’re up to speed on graduate-level Canadian history, you probably won’t guess the real reason. It wasn’t simply because First Nations were poor, or displaced, or lacked support (though these reasons obviously contributed.) It was because Aboriginal activism was explicitly against federal law.

    “In the early 20th Century, Aboriginal groups formed organisations to basically call for better conditions on reserves and call for education rights and things like that,” Clement explained. “Sometime in the early 1920s, the federal government essentially criminalised and put in the Indian Act that Aboriginal groups could not form political associations and they were also not allowed to litigate land claims…That lasted until about 1969.”

    http://restructure.wordpress.com/2009/08/2...ism-until-1970/

    This is a small part of what we have to hear. I sure hope our governments, and all Canadians are listening during the Truth Commission.

  6. Hopeful news!

    http://www.thestar.com/news/ontario/article/685511

    George Lawrence is proof positive that good things sometimes come to those who wait.

    For more than 15 years, he has battled a proposed garbage dump in Tiny Township, just northwest of Barrie, home to some of the best and most productive farmland in Ontario's food belt.

    A recent surge in local councillors' support has come in time for this week's county council vote on the matter.

    He didn't do it alone, of course. Lawrence, now in his first term as deputy mayor of the rural township, was part of a close-knit group of farmers, environmentalists and residents who opposed the Site 41 facility in their quietly polite way.

    They could learn tomorrow if they have won a one-year moratorium on the project that they say will pollute the Alliston Aquifer. Scientists say it contains some of the world's purest drinking water.

    YES!! Some County Councillors are changing their minds!

    It only takes one to change the 16-15 vote that approved the dump!!

    Looks good for tomorrow's vote.

    THIS DUMP WILL NEVER OPEN !!! :D

    9am - County Council meets with the community/protesters at County office.

    11 am County Council meets to consider a moratorium. They'll probably make some excuse to go 'in camera'.

    Warden Tony Guergis takes his last shot ... and boy is he p'd!

    As for dump critics, Guergis dismissed them as NIMBYs who do not know what they are talking about. "Just because the public is against it doesn't mean they're informed on the issue. We're now going into round 20, just to appease the public."

    Just to appease the public, eh Tony. That would be the "public" who democratically elected you to represent them, right ?!?!

    Tiny pathetic dictator wannabes should not run for public office: That's not the way democracy works. <_<

  7. This is an awesome essay about seeking peace among cultures. The beginning is about Obama's speech in the middle east, not quoted here but worth reading. The ending part is about Canada

    http://www.owensoundsuntimes.com/ArticleDi....aspx?e=1712743

    ...

    If stories are the starting point for understanding a people, then place is the starting point for understanding their stories -- Moses, Jesus and Mohammed prayed together in the same land in which God created Adam and Eve.

    As the sign at the entrance to the Ziibiwing Heritage Centre of the Saginaw Chippewa Tribe in Michigan says, "All creation myths are true."

    ...

    In this regard, Canada is a difficult country. Most of our mythologies come from somewhere else. They are all as true as anyone else's, but here is not their birthplace. And the languages we use to tell them (French, English, Polish, Greek, Chinese, Urdu, Yoruba, Tamil and a whole lot more) are also rooted in lands other than North America.

    Those whose stories and spirit and languages do come from this place are Aboriginal, literally "from the beginning." Aboriginal peoples are our Other. Even more so than the French for the English or the English for the French, for both have been dealing (and not well) with Turtle Island peoples for 400 years.

    And now Chinese, Jamaicans, Tamils, Indians -- the real ones, from India -- are also not dealing very well with Turtle Island peoples. Turtle Island is what Aboriginal peoples call North America -- the source of their stories, spirit and language. The name itself, Turtle Island, has its origins in Aboriginal myths.

    If President Obama is onto something -- if we can begin to understand the Other from their mythologies -- then we must ask, how well do we know the stories at the heart of Aboriginal culture? For their myths -- those stories that define a people -- are very different from ours. There is, I think, more that separates us from First Nations than from Muslim nations. But that's all the more reason to start with the stories of Turtle Island.

    "How well do we know their stories" is not an idle question. We are about to hear their stories yet again -- from the new Grand Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, Shawn Atleo, and from residential school victims during the Truth and Reconciliation hearings. Some of what they tell us we won't want to hear. But listen we must and, this time, try to understand them from their point of view -- from the point of view of Aboriginal culture.

    I hope the media is prepared to do as good a job in teaching us about Aboriginal culture as they have been about Muslim culture. We all know stories about land claims and Aboriginal rights because the media has reported the facts of the disputes; but do we understand what it is about Aboriginal culture that sets First Nations so at odds with the rest of Canadian society?

    We know about residential schools and we know that they have done harm, but do we know why? What is it, exactly, about Aboriginal ways of raising children, of seeing the world, of knowing the spiritual, of relating to one another and to the land that was so damaged by residential schools? And why is it that our governments' policies and practices continue to offend and seem to have no effect on the well-being of Aboriginal peoples?

    I suspect the answer lies somewhere in our separate mythologies. All myths are true, but they are not all the same. Perhaps giving people the room to be different by starting with their stories as they wish them told is to let peace settle upon us all.

    You can read more essays by David McLaren at

    http://mclarenathome.spaces.live.com/

    Article ID# 1712743

    Submit content

    "giving people the room to be different" ... and respecting traditional stories, traditional ways, traditional lands.

    Case in point ... How many of us know that we live on Turtle Island (North America)?

    It is time for us to put aside our preconceived notions and just listen.

  8. Well it seems the options of Khadr's kids were pretty limited while their father was alive, and momma's no peach either:

    Brother Abduraham

    "Okay, the first time I went to training I was 11 and a half years old. I remember that. My brother was 12 and we went to Khaladan," Abdurahman says. "We took the first course, which is the assault rifles course. We stayed in the course for two months and then we went back to Pakistan. And then since like, I could say since '92 until 2003, I've been to Khaladan like five times. I took an assault rifle course, explosive-making course, snipers, pistols… and a course that includes all of these."

    ...

    "I like my son to be brave. I mean as I was telling you, if I was in Canada, I would like my son to be trained to protect himself, to protect his home, to protect his neighbour, to really fight to defend it. I would really love to do that, and I would love my son to grow with this mentality," Maha says.

    ...

    "You would like me to raise my child in Canada and by the time he's 12 or 13 he'll be on drugs or having some homosexual relation or this and that. Is it better?" Maha says. "For me, no. I would rather have my son as a strong man who knows right and wrong and stands for it even if it's against his parents. It's much better for me than to have my child walking on the streets in Canada taking drugs or doing all this nonsense."

    ...

    The rebellious behavior of Abdurahman in the bin Laden training camps became increasingly embarrassing for his father. There were intense arguments between father and son.

    ...

    "Three times my father himself tried to get me to become a suicide bomber," Abdurahman says. "He sat me down with the al-Qaeda scholar, he sat me down with, you know, the person to train people to become suicide bombers. He sat me down with these two people and tried to convince me to become a suicide bomber. He's like, you know, you'd be our pride in this family, you'd be our pride, you know, if you do this. But I was totally against it. I was like I believe in fighting, you know, someone on the ground and he shoots me and I shoot him, you know. But I don't believe in blowing myself up, killing innocent people. I don't, I just don't believe in that… I just see that he [my father] really believed in it. And he wanted me to believe in it too."

    So ... that's what they do with the kids who rebel: make them become suicide bombers.

    Some choice Omar had.

  9. QUOTE (whowhere @ Aug 22 2009, 12:12 AM) *

    The conservatives idea of success is everyone making minimum wage while the corporations keep all the money. The conservatives logic is lower corporate taxes somehow encourages corporations to pay more wages but that is not the corporate mentality. They are selfish greedy enterprises who require to be beaten with a stick for their repressive economics tactics. In down economy the tax burden has to be shifted to the corporations and away from the people. As the economy improves the taxes can be shifted back onto the people and balance struck to maintain the economic engine.

    jbg said

    I don't know where you draw your conclusions from. Corporations cannot force anyone who doesn't want to work to work. If they have demand they need qualified employees, period. This applies whether or not the corporation is unionized, a possibility you omit.

    quote name='whowhere' date='Aug 23 2009, 05:58 PM' post='456328'

    Obviously you are clueless to finding employment. Look through the Job Bank and you will see the employers dictate minimum wage or wages close to minimum wage. A lot of these jobs are channelled through employment agencies and many corporations use employment agencies as a way of business. Ten years ago 1 in 10 jobs were through employment agencies, now its 1 in 4 jobs are through employment agencies. As for corporations forcing people to work for minimum wage is more because the conservatives have created an environment where large corporations are employment predators searching for the ever increasing number of immigrants the conservatives are rolling out the red carpet to.

    I know this as fact because I have experiennced it and see it on a daily basis. The latest conservative tactic is to allow someone from another country to come to Canada and attend college or university for 1 year and then they are able to go out and look for employment. These people are only to happy to find work and these corporations are all to happy to hire them for close to minimum wage.

    So when mr domestic Canadian goes looking for work, mr Corporation says sorry buddy tough luck we're not hiring. These people congest our roads and drive up retail costs on everything all the while keeping incomes low.

    The conservatives can make whatever decisions they want about who to let in, jump the queue however they like, thanks to their recent legislation. However, Is this the direction their preferences take? I don't know. For sure it would be purely to benefit the business community. Perhaps some of the business owners here can comment on that.

    College or university. That's kinda cool. International students pay big tuition and would also have to have their own means to survive one year. If they can hack college, show they have the English language skills, they can probably work successfully. Sounds like a very reasonable approach to me.

    Congesting our roads? We all do that. :rolleyes:

    Canada is a failed country. When retail costs for beer is 300 percent more for the same beer and gas is 40 percent more than retail in the US, that's a problem.

    For this to be going shows the conservatives are either over taxing Canadians or they are guilty of market protectionism. Every time I go to the store it makes me sick knowing I would get a certain item at a lower cost south of the border. To add insult to injury I am taxed on that inflated amount.

    The conservative are a fat cat party.

    Well ... not exactly a 'failed state' yet. :lol: Beer, well that's catastrophic of course, and I don't know why ... cept ours is sure better than that love-in-a-boat* they call beer!

    *(f'n near water)

    Oil ... we don't have any refineries, so that's the cost of shipping and refining and shipping back, I guess. And maybe they own the oil rigs and oil rights in the first place so we have to buy it from them too, and profits all along that chain are theirs.

    This is wandering from the topic, but it's all relevant to Indigenous people since it's their natural resources. It's not like we brought the oil with us from Europe!

    As Indigenous people say: "How did 'your' oil get under my land? :lol:

  10. lol...whatever!

    shoot the little terrorist's bastard!

    Well I guess you weren't really bothered by being referred to as a 'child killer' at all, were you?

    oleg said

    If I see a person and he looks at me with hate and in his eyes burns murder

    Unh ... psychopaths don't oleg.

    QUOTE (Oleg Bach @ Aug 23 2009, 02:04 PM) *

    Is that the Cheney definition of terrorist or the Israeli definintion of terrorist? The Cheney one is - what ever poor guy who tries to mess with my stack of cash - is a terrorist ...The Israeli definition is _ what every guy attempts to get back from me what I have stolen from him is a terrorist. laugh.gif

    Good points!

    And of course Cheney creates terrorism so he gets the business

    No! that would be the Islamic radical definintion of a terrorist's and we need to shoot every damn one of them!

    no exception!.......dead terrorist's no longer terrorize! There is no room for Compassion for terrorist's absolutely none!! We need to use every means at our disposal to Hunt them, Find them and of course destroy them!

    How do you identify them wulf? sniff test? :lol:

  11. I get my own area! I rant and type and talk and go on and on and on - then I read my own posts and am ever so pleased with myself - love it when I make me laugh. Once in a while I actually have to read someone elses post...that's such a chore for such a self centred egotist such as me...so off I go - and don't give a crap if I am the only one reading me.... I love me - It's all about me - the universe revolves around me --ANYBODY GOT A PROBLEM WITH THAT? :lol:

    That's called a personal blog, oleg. You can get one of those elsewhere. Then nobody reads your stuff unless they choose to go there. :D

    Some personal journaling never hurts!

  12. Would be nice if the "Ontario liberals" were actually real liberals instead of fake ones doing the private bidding of old conservative buisness types. The only real liberals they have are those with the cut out leather shorts in the gay day parade - just enough of an diversion to keep up and coming young conservatives preturbed and disorientated by the orientation. :rolleyes: Toronto will always be a conservative town - who ever has the money rules..same for all of Ontario - and no way are we going to let some wack job liberals sit on the board of a major bank..but we will let one be mayor..cerimonial of couse.

    Toronto is a Liberal town, but largely in the conservative sense. Lots of the guys in the shorts are conservative too.

    BC

    Tax strikes a harmonious chord

    Business owners expect advantages even if they're short on specifics

    By Lena Sin, The ProvinceAugust 23, 2009

    Council of Forest Industries CEO John Allan sees the HST as a significant boost for the troubled forestry sector, perhaps saving it as much as $140 million through credit claims.

    Council of Forest Industries CEO John Allan sees the HST as a significant boost for the troubled forestry sector, perhaps saving it as much as $140 million through credit claims.

    Photograph by: Arlen Redekop, The Province, The Province

    Mike Bohonos admits he was horrified when the provincial government first announced the introduction of a Harmonized Sales Tax.

    But after weeks of talking to accountants and other businesses, the controller for Jenner Chevrolet in Victoria has come around to seeing its advantages -- even if he can't quite quantify them yet.

    "I would say after the initial shell shock, I'm probably more in favour of it," Bohonos says.

    The family-run car dealership is among the thousands of businesses in B.C. expected to reap cost savings from the HST. But a lack of understanding of the new tax has left even some businesses confused about how they will benefit.

    Under the proposal, the provincial sales tax and federal goods and services tax would be harmonized into a single 12-per-cent tax, effective July 1, 2010.

    Proponents of the HST, including the B.C. Chamber of Commerce and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of B.C., explain there are two main benefits to the move:

    - First, businesses will save on administrative costs. Instead of dealing with two taxes -- the five-per-cent GST and seven-per-cent PST -- businesses will save time and money by having paperwork for just one.

    - Second, businesses will see costs reduced by claiming an HST credit for all goods purchased for the operation of their business. Currently, businesses can only claim a tax credit on the GST paid for "input" resources, with no mechanism to reclaim the PST they pay on "inputs."

    In total, the B.C. government claims an estimated $1.9 billion of sales tax will be removed from business inputs.

    ...

    http://www.theprovince.com/business/strike...1789/story.html

    ON

    PETERBOROUGH -- A federal Conservative MP may be distancing himself from the controversial harmonized sales tax, but Premier Dalton McGuinty says he couldn't have done it without the Stephen Harper government.

    McGuinty said yesterday his government made the decision to proceed with a 13% harmonized federal and provincial sales tax.

    "But what made it more feasible was the agreement that we entered into with the federal government to provide us with financial support which we intend to pass onto our families and our small businesses to help them adjust to the single sales tax," McGuinty said.

    "So we initiated it, I think that's fair to say, and we had a good productive conversation with the federal government that enabled us to move ahead."

    Ottawa gave the McGuinty government $4.3 billion which is being used to send out $1,000 rebates to most families and $300 to most individuals, and also to lower personal and small business taxes.

    The HST will extend the 8% PST to many items and services not previously subject to the tax, such as home heating fuel, lawyer and accountant fees and inexpensive shoes.

    Conservative MP Larry Miller wrote in Sun sister paper the Owen Sound Sun Times last week that residents in his riding of Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound had been raising "many concerns" with him about the HST, which goes into effect on July 1, 2010.

    "First, I want to make it clear that this was a change initiated by the province of Ontario and was not a decision made by the federal government in any way," Miller says in his opinion piece, From The Hill.

    "Mr. McGuinty must not only commit to maintaining as many exemptions as possible, he must also commit that the change to the new tax system will be revenue neutral."

    PC Bill Murdoch, who represents the same area provincially, said the federal Conservatives are trying to pretend they had nothing to do with the HST, which is going over very poorly in his riding.

    ...

    I'll take the rebate! :D

  13. Tango, I don't think it's a case of people accepting a verdict of guilty or not guilty. It's a case of whether people give a damn. Some people have passed the point of caring and some people have not cared one way or another since day one. Whatever, he's a whipping boy for two distinct camps. One group uses him to whip up anti-US sentiment and the other to whip up vigilance in the fight against terrorism. There is no middle ground that I can detect.

    If he's found guilty, he'll never be set free, whether he serves his sentence in a US jail or a Canadian jail. If he's found not guilty, he'll be a hounded man until the day he dies. Either way, his life is no longer his own.

    Considering the amount of discussion on this topic, I think people do "give a damn" one way or another.

    No anti-US sentiment here. I'm impressed with the US soldiers who've stepped up to defend him. I also think that the US would be very relieved if Canada stepped up and brought him home: I think they know now that they don't have evidence against him, and they are embarrassed about keeping a kid incarcerated so long without trial.

    Omar's life is toast either way, it's true. But perhaps there is hope he'll follow his brother's footsteps:

    In the city of Toronto, on the other side of the world from Pakistan, is 21-year-old Abdurahman, the self-proclaimed black sheep of the Khadr family. He was released from the American prison at Guantanamo last October and says he is now prepared to tell his full story for the first time.

    "I want to show people that I'm a person that lived all my life as Ahmed Said's son," he says. "A person that was raised to become an al-Qaeda, was raised to become a suicide bomber, was raised to become a bad person, and I came out to become – you know… I decided on my own that I do not want to be that, and I do not want to be a Muslim that's so loose… I want to be a good, strong, civilized, peaceful Muslim."

    Here lies the essential division in the Khadr family.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/khadr/alqaedafamily2.html

    He believes if al-Qaeda in Bosnia had found out he was working for the CIA, he would have been shot.

    "It was always in the back of my mind and that's what I always told the CIA," Aburahaman said. "'You know what, you're paying me money and you think it's a lot, but you know there is that risk that I'll get shot. So don't think you're doing me a big favour by giving me that money. I'm doing you a big favour by working for you.'"

    Abdurahman was in Bosnia when news arrived of the military attack in Pakistan, which killed his father, Ahmed Said Khadr. Abdurahman says he had long resented his father for dragging the whole family into the world of al-Qaeda.

    "My reaction was, he's my father. There is no change to that. So as my father, I love him and I will always love him as my father, but not as what he did," he said.

    "I've gone through so much that when they told me about it there was no reaction, there was no emotion," he said.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/khadr/alqaedafamily8.html

    For several months, Abdurahman travelled regularly around Kabul with American investigators and visitors.

    "There was this tour. They called it Abdurahman tour," he said. " I was famous for that. I took people from the CIA, the FBI, and the military. We'd go around in a car in Kabul and I'd show them the houses of al-Qaeda people, the guesthouses, the safe houses - the house they used [before September 11] and the houses they used after."

    U.S. embassy in Kabul

    Abdurahman says he lived for nine months in a CIA safe house near the American embassy in Kabul. One day he was told that he was going to meet some visitors from Canada - four policemen who said they were from Toronto and Ottawa.

    "They had me swear on the Koran that I would tell them the truth, the whole truth. They started asking me questions about my father, the organization he was working for, how he was connected to al-Qaeda, about my uncle, here in Canada, about my grandmother, about anybody that's related to us in any way.

    "They stayed for two days. When they were done with me they told me 'you've been very cooperative. You've told us everything you knew. We think we can trust you and the minute we get [get back to Canada] we're going to try our best to get you back.'

    "They showed me badges, told me they were from the RCMP."

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/khadr/alqaedafamily6.html

    "Why am I telling the story right now? Because I…cannot keep it in my heart anymore. I got to tell people I lied to them in the beginning…I want the people to learn that I lied for a reason and I'm sorry to have lied to them and I want to tell them the real story."

    So why should anyone believe him?

    "I cannot force anyone to believe me. I'm just saying that…this time I'm saying the truth. That is all the truth there is to it. Since I said this story I know there's going to be people after me. My family is going to hate me. Why do you think I would do all of this if it was just a lie?"

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/khadr/alqaedafamily6.html

  14. Keep faith with Ontario's far north

    Toronto Star

    EDITORIAL

    Aug 23, 2009 04:30 AM

    Premier Dalton McGuinty says his government is building a "new respect and working relationship" with First Nations.

    Yet chiefs of the Nishnawbe Aski Nation (NAN) territory – seething over new planning legislation for the far north – are now threatening to "exercise full and exclusive jurisdiction" over traditional lands.

    NAN, which represents most of the people who live in the northern boreal region (the northernmost 40 per cent of our province) increasingly feels betrayed by Queen's Park for failing to deliver on its promises to First Nations.

    When Ontario was updating the antiquated mining act, the aboriginal minister of the day said "there will be no situation where exploration will take place on traditional territories ... without the consent of First Nations."

    The changes, introduced in May, required far more consultation and cooperation with First Nations. Now, natives are understandably disappointed to learn they will not get any clear power to veto attempts to stake claims on traditional lands.

    Last year, McGuinty made Canada's largest conservation commitment by pledging to permanently protect at least half the northern boreal region – 225,000 square kilometres of traditional NAN territory. The Premier said it would empower First Nations and ensure their communities benefited from development on the remaining land.

    Yet, the legislation – which passed first reading in June and underwent hurried committee hearings this month – is such a disappointment to First Nations that NAN chiefs are vowing to fight it.

    The bill requires the creation of land-use plans before development can take place. But the government controls the process, the money to create a plan and the final approval of a plan.

    This does not feel like the "true partnership" First Nations were promised. Indeed, it is a continuation of the old paternalistic relationship.

    It also goes against the advice of the government's own advisory council, made up of environmental and industry representatives. The council called for a planning board, jointly appointed by First Nations and the government, to manage the region.

    The province should consider including this in amended legislation to ensure it delivers on its stated vision of protection, and economic development, for Ontario's far north. It would also go some way to bringing First Nations back into the fold.

    If the government unwisely continues to ignore the views of those who have long called this region home, there is little hope the province's legislation will succeed in meeting its goals.

    MORE ...

    http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/684888

    So the new mining act doesn't seem to protect Indigenous communities from the disastrous environmental effects of mines, because they cannot say no. Neither can we: If someone wants to prospect on your land, you cannot say no. They can cut down trees for access, drill test holes, etc and there is nothing you can do.

    Unfortunately, it seems that this attempt to improve the Mining Act really hasn't changed a thing.

  15. ELMVALE – The Stop Dump Site 41 group is demanding an immediate retraction of a media release sent out yesterday afternoon by the “Office of the Warden and CAO of Simcoe County,” namely Tony Guergis and Mark Aiken.

    “This release is inflammatory, libelous and racially stereotyping,” said Kate Harries, a spokesperson for the Stop Dump Site 41 protest.

    “It also shows a lack of respect for the court, in that it uses the words of Justice Peter Lauwers to bolster a fabrication.”

    The County release says that a “dozen individuals wearing black bandanas over their faces have informed onsite staff that they will allow safe exit from the North Simcoe Landfill but that re-entry will not be permitted.”

    “I have confirmed with Constable Heidi Fisher of the OPP’s aboriginal relations team (ART) that this did not happen,” Harries said. “She said she called through to her staff sergeant to say that the information in the release was not correct.”

    http://stopdumpsite41.ca/?p=740

    Well, the County just had to play the race card!

    Shows how desperate they are to push ahead with the dump.

    One has to wonder why, when the County still has 10 years of capacity.

    Who has a private stake in this?

    Or are they just that boneheaded they don't want their constituents to tell them what to do?

  16. Tango, you sound pissed .....it is not my intention to insult you, if you took it that way i apoligize, it is my intention to make the facts clear, as they are still very clouded to some....and with an issue as important as this it needs to be very clear....

    Below is taken from the witness report from the soldier known as OC-1....I think once you read this i think it will become clear that you are confusing some of the facts....as to whom was in the rubble, and where Omar was found....

    OC-1 witness report

    - took a low position at the southeast corner of the alley. This was the first time - stopped moving since the initiating (sic) the approach to the compound. He saw a man lying underneath some rubble and debris (he presumed resulting from the air strikes) that he believed was clearly dead. He heard moaning coming from the back of the compound. The dust rose up from the ground and began to clear, he then saw a man facing him lying on his right side. - identified this man as the man photographed in Attachment 7). The man had an AK 47 on the ground beside him and the man was moving. - fired one round striking the man in the head and the movement ceased. Dust was again stirred by this rifle shot. When the dust rose, he saw a second man sitting up facing away from him leaning against brush. This man later identified as KHADR, was moving. (- identified this man as the man photographed in Attachment 8.) ] - fired two rounds both of which struck KHADR in the back. - estimated that from the initiation of the approach to the compound to shooting KHADR took no more than 90 seconds, with all of the events inside the compound happening in less than a minute.

    - moved into the alley and noted that the man under the rubble was in fact dead and there was a second man dead under the rubble next to him (see Attachment 9 for details of the alley. Attachments 10 and 11 are photos identified as the two bodies under the rubble). A damaged AK 47 (appeared to be damaged by air strikes) was on the ground next to them - said that the nature of the injuries, which included burned, the dust and debris on top of the bodies, and the general state of these two bodies caused him to believe they were dead prior to his entry into the compound. -moved to the back of the compound and checked the first man he shot. The man was decased and in addition to the wound to his head, he had two gunshot wound two his chest. - believed that these chest wounds were inflicted by the 12 rounds he fired down the alley when he crossed the alley's entranceway. - noted this man was armed with a pistol in a holster in addition to the AK 47 by his side. - observed a small weapon (a pistol or grenade, - could not recall which) on the ground near KHADR. - then tapped KHADR's eye to see if he was alive. KHADR reacted and was placed on his back. - then turned him over to be secured by other personnel who had now entered the alley. - noted an additional AK 47 in the alley and several grenades. (The location of the grenades are marked "G", the pistol is marked "P" and AK 47s are marked "AK" by - on Attachment 9).

    This is not true, below was taken from wiki, but is also mentioned in several other statements....Omar was asking soldiers to Kill him, in english which surprised soldiers ....it was spec ops guys that prevented other soldiers from carring out Omar wishes....It was not until later did they find out that he was Canadian, his age, or is relation in the Al Quadia family....

    wiki

    Lets put some things into context shall we, Most Afghanis know during this period of time that NATO is involved in combat operations ...Combat operations again'st specfic targets or groups....a line in the sand was clearly drawn...

    He would not need to defend himself if he was not involved with the Taliban or other terrorist organizations....

    When the Afghanis soldiers walked towards the house , to announce thier intentions of searching it...they were gunned down....by omars buddies ....they knew that they did not want NATO to find anything they had hidden, or what the house was being used for....to build bombs...they also did not want to surrender....

    The just defending yourself excuse does not wash.....

    HE was'nt under any rubble....

    And one interrogator out of the dozens that interviewed him state this the rest say he is guilty of something....

    Some of the charges he was charged with on his 2 and trail.....

    He was charged with Murder in Violation of the Law of War, Attempted Murder in Violation of the Law of War, Conspiracy, Providing Material Support for Terrorism and Spying

    That being said if brought back into Canada to face trail what would we charge him with...it has already been decided that most of the evidence could not be used as it was obtained thru torture....so what does that leave us with....

    Does that mean we will never know....because our justice system is not set up to handle these type of cases....

    wiki

    Neither of those are from the Jan 2009 court reports.

    Find out what was said under oath in court.

  17. Privacy Commissioner gives county second warning

    Author: Laurie Watt, STAFF

    Date: Aug 21, 2009

    The Ontario Information and Privacy Commissioner Ann Cavoukian issued an order to Simcoe County to take all steps – including legal action – to obtain the hydrogeological data at the core of the Site 41 controversy.

    Friday afternoon, the IPC issued its second order related to a two-year-old appeal from longtime anti-dump activist Steve Ogden, who has served on the Site 41 Community Monitoring Committee.

    “When institutions embark on ventures that will have major implications to the public, as is the case with Site 41, they must plan up-front to include access to information of public interest,” said Cavoukian.

    “I cannot stress enough the importance of freedom of information. If citizens are to participate meaningfully in the democratic process and hold politicians and bureaucrats accountable, they must have timely access to this type of information.”

    IPC adjudicator Colin Bhattacharjee said the county “ is continuing an unacceptable pattern of conduct in which it is deliberately disassociating itself for key records relating to the environmental integrity of Site 41, despite the fact these records were created by (consulting firm) Jagger Hims with taxpayers’ money.

    ...

    http://www.collingwoodconnection.com/colli.../article/143692

    Hmm ... County is pushing it down to the wire. As well as taking a vote on Tuesday about a moratorium on the dump, they will also have to make a decision about a response to the FOI Commissioner.

    The county has since indicated in a letter to the IPC that it is not willing to take any additional actions to obtain the data.

    Cavoukian has described the county response as "completely unacceptable."

    The IPC order issued yesterday says that in failing to obtain the records from Jagger Hims, "the County has failed to comply with the initial order."

    The IPC order is clear: The county must obtain the data. Once it has done that, it must decide whether to provide it Ogden. The county has 30 days to decide. If it chooses to refuse, Ogden can appeal that decision to the IPC.

    The latest development has prompted Midland Mayor James Downer to question whether there ever was a Modflow.

    "It makes one wonder if it ever existed," he said. "If there really is a Modflow, let us see it. The taxpayers are paying for it, they have a right to see it."

    http://www.thebarrieexaminer.com/ArticleDi....aspx?e=1711077

    No kidding! What's the big secret, Warden Tony??

  18. Obviously, he was mature enough to attend terrorist camp where they teach how to kill. He was also given the responsibility of being either a translator, soldier or both. He was also ready to die for Allah and go to paradise.

    "That's Omar ... he would always just cry."

    It worked on Chretien.

    That was his older brother Abdullah.

    If he didn't throw it, he might not be a murderer, but he's still a terrorist.

    Is that one of the charges against him?

    Do you have a citation for that by chance? It seems like an odd statement since playstation 3 wasn't released until 2006.

    I knew I'd get that wrong. It was one of those game things.

    google ... news from the pretrial, Jan 20 or so.

    He had the cajones to die.

    I don't think so. :lol:

  19. Well well!

    Environmental activist and former U.S. presidential candidate Ralph Nader is appealing to Ontario's premier to halt construction on Site 41, a controversial landfill project.

    In a passionate letter to Dalton McGuinty dated today, Mr. Nader says he was surprised at the vehement local uproar against the dump being constructed about 40 kilometres northwest of Barrie, Ont.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/nation...article1259043/

    The County will take its vote on a moratorium on Tues (25). If they don't do the right thing, then it's time for the Ministry of the Environment to act and shut it down.

    This may help a bit.

  20. Amazing.....how the whiners want to put native people's issues out of sight...out of mind....

    Why don't we create a special forum for Jews and Blacks too...?

    Yep ... segregated 'homelands' here on mlw. :lol:

    And one for Palestinians too, of course!

    There! We've solved that contentious and repetitive Israeli-Palestinian issue! We won't let them talk to each other!

    :lol:

    And one for women, one for men ... one for younger adults, another for 'mature' adults ...

    yup ... heck ... lets just each have our own thread and talk to ourselves!! :lol:

  21. The point is that if you

    The idea is that the end result will see Maybe 75% of the idiots no longer voting, along with perhaps 20% of the people who deserved to vote now disinfranchised. But that will still produce a voting block considerably better in terms of knowledge and intelligence than what we have now.

    Define "idiot" please?

    And why disenfranchise 'worthy' people?

    Only about 60% of us vote anyway. I don't think fewer voters is the answer.

×
×
  • Create New...