Alta4ever

Although putting a consumption tax on these products doesn't adress the feeling in our society that health care is free. We would still have those that would abuse the sytem becuase thier is no perceived cost.

Wow, you couldn't be more wrong with this post. As I have in the post before I am not a "creationist" I don't beleive that the universe, and life just popped into existance about 6000 years ago. I have no problem with the idea that apes and humans shared/share a common link in evolution. But I do beleive that every evolutionary step that life has taken has gods hand in it. (for some reason you have a problem with this) I was an atheist, it 15 years for me to find god. You are merely looking to smear people of faith. I am not anti science, it is you who are anti religion and have trouble accepting that people can beleive and follow both.

Oh goody the courts, such a science based forum. Got something better?

Did Mulrooney cause the increase of intrest in other countries too.? Look it was the conomics of the time that caused the interest problem. Our debt grew by that interest, and it was another 3 years into liberal government before intrest rates were at a point were something could be done. Trudeau was the begining of our debt problems, and know how much you don't like ot hear that. Although I wish that Mulrooney would have had the balls to reverse it all back to pre trudeau. If he had maybe we would have owed a 100 billion less.

I really miss the way KFC use to taste, it was a nice treat, for the 3 or four times a year that i ate it, I would gladly pay more to have it fried in the good grease.

So becuase I am ignorant of all the current research on evolution means I don't beleive in it, that is a rather ignorant comment. Does that mean I don't understand the importance of scintific research, of course not. It is a smear of Mr. Goodyear that you are trying justify with absolutly no facts, just a reporters narrative.

The intrest rates were climibing before he raised taxes, try again.

What did ou say again about the current conservatives back in Novemeber when they weren't going to add spending going when the effects of the recession were very prevelant? I seem to recall more more more, and no we would not accept you cutting taxpayer money funding political parties.

Again you ahve proven nothing you have just extraplated out you own opinion to suit the smear

sounds like you are jealous.

You are arguing symantics, and yet you fail to adress how this means he will do a bad job. It is a smear.

So what, because he doesn't sight the right example of evolution for you, means that he doesn't understand science. Thats a stretch, wait no an excuse to smear.

I didn't know that the PRime Minister had direct control over the global lending cost of money. It does vindicate him on the dramitic increase of our debt during the late 80's and early 90's. As I proved even with some debt repayment the economic realities of the time took the debt that trudeau created and ballooned it to what it was at the end of Mulroney's government. The only way for this to have not to happaned was to pay off the debt in its entirety in the first 2 years. Which was the worst recesion in decades. Although he did make a few changes that put us in a postition where we would be able to start addressing the debt and the biggest and most important of all of these was Nafta.

If fact some of the GMC and chev trucks are built in the same factory.

I am not talking about the "americanization" of health care I am talking about changing so that their is a visable cost to health care, that will reward those who make good choices and penalize those who do not or abuse the system.Yet all would have access to the same level of healthcare without being discriminated against for ablity to pay.

Lets assume (for example) mulrooney was in a suplus postition for government spending every year of his government. Small debt repayments were made of say 1 Billion per year. Trudeaus debt year one of mulrooney 127 bill - 1 bill = 124 + 12% interest = 138.88 Bill Mulrooney year two 138.88 bill-1bill= 137.88bill + 12%= $154.43 Bill year 3 154.43 - 1 = 153.43 +12%=172.96 year 4 172.96 -1= 171.96 +12%= 193.71 year 5 193.71 -1=192.71 +12%= 216.96 year 6 216.96 - 1= 215.96 + 12%= 242.99 year 7 242.99-1= 241.99 + 12%= 272.15 year 8 272.15 -1 = 271.15 +12%=303.69 year 9 303.15-1= 302.15 + 12%= 339.01 year 10 339.01-1= 338.01 +12%= 378.57 So now you can see what running surpluses would have done at an average interest rate of 12%. This is an example of what happened in the 80's. While I am no fan of mulrooney the economics of the time vindicate him. The difference between the 90's and the 80's was the interest rate, by the time Chretien took over and started making repaiments in '96 the intrest rat had dropped dramatically.

So you are smearing him, becuase you have no facts. Until you post something that shows he is incabaple of the job you are smearing this man.

Funny the most of parts are interchangeable, same engine, same frame....

Yet it has not been proven. It is a smear.

MR. goodyear has never stated that he doesn't beleive in science, the creationsit suggestion was added by the author of the story not by Mr. goodyear. This has been one big smear.

Just the same as the american liberals were rooting for America to fail during bush's administration.

As I said if you moment came on side and wanted to see a change to how all Universal Healthcare was deleivered to make more responsible for their choices and not the taxpayer then I would work with you.

Do you know what was in the secret intellegence that the judge got to see?

So lets get this straight you are smart and the masses of people who beleive in god are stupid. Got it

All it wold take take for me to come on side with you on this issue Dr. Greenthumb is the movement from the population that you represent that would allow a change to how universal health care was distributed.