Xman

Ad hominen deflection.

Now this is a discussion. Do you think that "ugly" is a dominant gene?

Reality is what you believe it to be.

Reality is what we believe it to be.

Most of those people don't repeatedly mis-spell 'hegemony.' Some of them even know what they're talking about. I see you cannot dispute the facts -- only the spelling. Typical of Bush defenders -- attack the messenger instead of debating the facts. Oh well, we already know all about your tactics. LOL Hear! Hear!

Debating whether the premise of his argument is valid in NOT "jumping all over him". Here's a question just as valid: Is anyone concerned that the beautiful people are intentionally destroying themselves as a homogenous race by having sex with uglies?

Disagree. Profit-making does not save money. The mission becomes maximizing profits. Instaed, put the monwy toward more public delivery of service. Ensure a high level of care for less. This depends on who pays for the profit. If a user-pay system is run parallel to our publicly funded system, it will save the public purse. In our current system though, profit-making is an large problem. Every doctor's office is a private business that generates income through number of visits. Doctors make more if they're inefficient and ineffective. One thing to consider would be to having salaried doctors in walk-in clinics. You might not get the best in the class to fill the job, the walk-in cases don't require top doctors. A system that keeps track of visits opposed to salary?

Yep...especially true given modern travel...

"They fact that they don't seems to indicate that others of "the White Canadian majority" don't have the same concern you express." Yep...need to express fears through a created crisis and ad hominen attacks.

It seems that Dancer has expressed the crux of the matter. I suppose survival is intentional. There's your answer, ScottSA.

Why is it indicative? Why is it intended? False premise.

But I have. Which book, specifically? And how can you stomach reading Chopra?

Wishes are for fairies.

Wealthy Xman.

"Descartes captured a profound self-awareness in the famous words Cogito, ergo sum. It was a self-awareness he gained by calling into question every proposition he had been taught, or had heard in church, or had read in a book. He decided to assume all things to be false until, as he put it, "presented to my mind so clearly and disctinctly that I would have no occasion to doubt it." Through this method, he discovered that the only thing he knew beyond all doubt was that he doubted. In his inner experience of himself doubting, he discovered his own soul - the place from which his doubting, and all his experiencing, originated. It was an epiphany - an epochal moment of illumination. Descartes caught himself in the act and existential moment of questioning. He recognized that he was listening to his soul. Descartes formalized this epiphany into a philosophy which we now call Cartesian dualism. It concludes that human nature must consist of two distinct essenses: the thinking mind, which is the center of consciousness and is spiritual, not subject to the laws of physics; and the physical body, which operates under the same mechanical laws that govern machines and animals. This dualistic philosophy reflects the universal human experience of inner conflict - a tension between opposing needs and tendencies within the self that triggers anxiety, shame and guilt. Dualistic philosophy has been linked with the religious problem of good and evil; an inner sense of moral choice between our temptation toward sin and our aspirations toward virtue. The distinction between the private inner world of introspective awareness and the public outer world of sensory awareness is self-evident; a complimentarity of inner awareness and outer perception, self and other, subject and object." - ScottSA

"Ok wait... I get it... you are trying to change the topic of this thread by posting inane one-liner troll-bait." Bingo!

Dang! I see that it is not restricted to Blacks only. Poor white folks can also be enslaved. Dang!

If you haven't read them, then how do you know?

No. Attacking innocent women and child is the atrocity. That's fine as long as it preserves our American dream.

There. There. Transfer that anger onto us. It's good for you. That's why we're here.

There. There. It's OK. Transfer that anger onto me. It's good for you.

You just never know. Do you? Eh, Scott?

Exactly.

ScottSA asks us, "Is anyone concerned that Caucasians are intentionally destroying themselves as a homogenous race?" He asks us if we are concerned about something that is NOT happening. Caucasians are NOT intentionally destroying themselves. The premise of his question is FALSE. I speculate that there is a need on the part of ScottSA to create a crisis and use that opportunity to express his fears though they are unfounded.

The proof is in the pudding.