godzilla

he's not above the law. that's what will come out of all of this. as an interesting side note... because he argues that he, his businesses and any associates are immune from prosecution or investigation, lower courts have already ruled that DOJ memos against presidential indictment are unsupported. he's kind digging his own whole there. once you give in to a tyrant that way... well, I guess no one can save you.

I think you meant "collusion" was inconclusive. 18 intelligence agencies were positive that Russia interfered.

great. as a Trump supporter then I hope you are contacting the white house and urging Trump to fess up. cause, he seems a little hesitant. hahaha!

well, they got aide in 2016, 2017 and 2018... without restrictions. without anything about corruption. in fact, Trump has never requested another country address corruption. but suddenly, with an election looming. corruption! specifically, Bidens and 2016 election corruption! how stupid do you most people are? more importantly, those critical of Trump get the new defence of R... that there is no defence. everyone does it. Trump got caught. move on. nothing to see here. get over it! they got the aide. so why doesn't Trump just admit to it and save everybody a bunch of trouble?

notice that Rs don't argue the facts of the case! maybe you should give them a call and straighten them out! they don't even argue that Trump was attempting to shank Ukraine.

best to do your own research then just listening to propaganda... Hearsay in United States law "One major misconception about the hearsay rule is that hearsay is never admissible in court. While the general rule is that such evidence is inadmissible, there are many exceptions." you don't know who Taylor is?!

Trump just got hung this morning... you can practically see him swinging from a tree. the Rs got roasted on every count.

I really appreciate such clarification. thanks Greg. having said that, I am getting the impression from these clarifications that the site is not to be used by professionals pundits? if that is the case then what criteria is used to determine whether profession pundits, whose purpose is simply to re-iterate political talking points without concern for critical discourse and to make every effort possible to monopolise that discourse, are participating?

americans caught directly participating in terror activities against the US and their allies and killed when in the company of foreign nationals carrying out those armed aggressive activities = the withholding of military aide to a helpless country at the hands of terror aggressors unless they manufacture political talking points against political opponents. your logic is absolutely clear... you have no logic.

I'm a naïve optimist, Yzermandius! you got me! but I'm only here to locate those reading from brochures and feeding their posts into my machine learning models for my masters thesis. and bush_cheneys2004 posts are red lining my models. she's/he's a crank. beware.

i hear ya, Yzermandius.

Yzermandius, I can tell even though you have yet to state it directly that you accept it to be a deplorable activity. that its wrong. that every action should be taken to ensure that its not happening if at all possible. I've read your other posts. you're not completely inhuman (or a paid crank).

its always personal when people promote that children catching large pieces of metal in their bodies is acceptable politically. or on any level. this is a site for Canadians and I don't know any Canadians who share that belief system. I also suspect there won't be another forum participant on this board who will support similar. unless there is another paid crank from the US participating. to be clear. I don't hate Trump. I bet he's a pretty fun guy to hang out with. I wouldn't allow him to run my business or my country. but whatever. you're not going hear real voices. you're a machine.

like I've stated. you're being brainwashed to expect less. its, we're all corrupt so pick your corruption. you're the one giving up. I've been back on this board for a short time and I've already detected that bush_cheney2004 is a professional crank. this is what she does for a living.

I'm not really interested in getting along with an american profession crank. this site is hosted by the University of Lethbridge which is a Canadian funded entity. its not a forum for foreign professional actors.

i see what you guys are saying... its like when people get upset about crooked cops. how should we expect all cops not to be crooked?! no need to complain or demand that cop be fired! we can't afford to keep looking for honest cops! same with those damn fireman, judges etc etc.. whats a little corruption! whats a little killing foreign children! get over it! that's the job!

how would you know anything about "most Canadians"? Trump deserves to have his share of children slaughtered?

maybe you could do us a favor and ignore us too then. cause most Canadians don't think its cool to blow up children. doesn't matter who it is. you just justify it because you've been doing it so long. right? so you're down with it.

wow, this is a job for you isn't it? I got your number now girl. don't think I can't sniff out a professional crank. you may fool regular posters but I can tell someone who really knows how to confuse rather than place anything in laser focus when it just.... doesn't... look... good.

we get your point that you make consistently. Trump can shoot someone on 5th avenue and there isn't a damn thing that anyone can do about it. and that people like you will make sure of it. you keep making out that no ones getting hurt. but then just recently Trump had a phone call and suddenly Kurdish children were getting their body parts separated. not really sure if you just completely lack any form of ethics, morals or... you're some kind of political volunteer or you're paid to do this. I mean, this is a Canadian political forum for Canadians, right?

man, the public impeaching hearings are going to be killer fun! god I hope Fiona Hill is on the ticket.. check out her testimony to date: Fiona Hill shuts Republicans up In particular, Jim Jordans star staffer getting shut down by Fiona! thata girl!

geesh, Clinton got a blowjob. how can you compare that to the big D!? hahahaa! its totally understandable why the House could easily take years doing what its doing because just about everything Don touches lights on fire. campaign finance violations, obstruction of justice, federal election law, impoundment control act... etc.. etc... lets face it, the Iran-Contra scandal and Watergate are so light weight!

ok, I agree then that that's an answer. albeit, a very scary one. supporters don't seem to care about the US position on the international stage. he could be having children cut up for body parts or whatever... as long as he's still "our" guy! geesh. I guess it has been a long time since Rs have had a president that they could be proud of. Bush Sr? and what is that end? does his supporters devise what that is? or does the R machine define that? I mean, overnight, "conservatism" went from one set of ideas to Trumps ideas. but that's another post I guess.

I think Clinton was impeached. "Impeachment is the process by which a legislative body levels charges against a government official. Impeachment does not in itself remove the official definitively from office; it is similar to an indictment in criminal law, and thus it is essentially the statement of charges against the official. " Impeachment

well, you're probably right. I think he probably has pushed things as far as they can go. but it is interesting that none of his supporters on this forum are able to answer the original question. what that breaking point is for them.