capricorn

Do you know just one person who is not a war criminal, rapist, baby killer or terrorist, other than you that is.

And you accuse me of deflecting. You can't turn the tables. You made a flagrant mistake now you wear it.

You erred when you said the Supreme Court ordered Harper to repatriate Khadr. In fact, the court ruled in the opposite. Suck it up.

Not factual. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/khadr-repatriation-overturned-by-top-court-1.893059

At least this time you're not advocating hitting them on the side of the head with shovels as you did in another post.

I'd match Harper's testimony on this matter anytime against the testimony lf Trudeau, Chretien and Martin. The best part Harper would get to testify it was he and his Conservative majority that managed to repatriate Khadr in 2012.

No it's not. The Court may have found a breach of Charter Rights but the court did not grant a particular amount. The compensation paid to Khadr is based on what Trudeau felt was a proper amount in order to protect the Liberal Party and have Khadr go away.

The civil suit was never heard in court. So you must mean the back room settlement was the result of Trudeau paying Khadr off. That ensures his beloved ex-PM Jean Chretien and ex-PM Paul Martin are spared the embarrassment of testifying in Khadr's civil suit.

Hey, Van Winkle, you must have been in a deep sleep when these events were taking place. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_8189.htm Some remedial history lessons are in order Rip.

Who cares if the Supreme Courts were the first to call the military commission a kangaroo court. Some members here are only too glad to call the military commission a kangaroo court then turn around and rely on claims of torture presented in evidence at that very same kangaroo court as proof of Khadr's entitlement to a payoff. Not surprising as Trudeau uses similar circular reasoning to defend why he authorized paying off Khadr to go away.

I'm not surprised you did not understand the point I was making.

On one hand, Trudeau and Khadr apologists denounce the US-lead trial that found Khadr guilty of murder and war crimes, calling it a kangaroo court and such. Then they rely on the evidence presented at that very same trial by the defendant as proof of torture and innocence. That makes for some very, very confused logic.

Give it time. His lawyers will come up with something. All eyes are now on the Khadr payoff.

Being sleep deprived because he can't stop thinking about all those millions he has in the bank could amount to torture. That should be worth another payoff. LOL

Lucky for us our government got in on the action selling weapons to the Saudis. How else are we going to pay for Trudeau's deficit, his cavorting with the Aga Khan, his nannies and family holidays.

You know, if you dropped a couple of bombs on their heads you'd save a ton on the cost of shovels. Sheesh....

I'm trying to compete with you that's why I post nonsense.

Re muslim cemeteries. Many communities have them and they don't present a problem.

Another one who got fooled about the goings on in Afghanistan. Actually, a US crew was in Afghanistan to film episodes of The Walking Dead. Gotcha!

If the Charter is to guarantee security of the person I would think that prosecution of murderers, terrorists and other criminals is one way to ensure said security..

Looking at Khadr's present day pictures and listening to his interviews, he seems pretty healthy to me. If he was sleep deprived it did not have a lasting effect on his well being. He's one up on the US soldier he killed. He's still alive and millions richer but the husband and father of two is dead.

I don't know how anyone can type properly on some of the phones in use these days. Seems most people use their thumbs to type. I'll stick to my desktop for these forums.

Just because I believe in law and order doesn't mean I have to agree with all court decisions and all government actions.

You said the conversation on this thread was going around in circles 15-20 pages ago. Yet, you haven't stopped posting since. Are you sure this time that there is nothing else of value to discuss?

It's all Harper's fault.