Jump to content

Avro

Member
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Avro

  1. Well of course Mathews would like Backmann, the dems want the nuttiest nut to run against Obama and she is a whole new kind of right wing nutter. I would like to nut on her face though, she is kinda hot.....perhaps her and Palin could snowball it.
  2. Watt an amazing come back...bravo retard.
  3. Just request an education and I will replyand stop pretending you know the facts ya stupid ass hammer.
  4. That's it, run away coward. Typical Con.
  5. Talk about dumb.....have you ever really looked into the consensus.....ever? I frickin doubt it.....I will help you if you are interested otherwise enjoy the flat earth. Psst....btw Singer and the Idso's are not climate scientist's. So two out of thousands.....you win....NOT.
  6. Btw, any cave dwellers that get their reports on climate from a big boobed weather girl on some FOX station in Buffalo and believe she is part of any consensus on science read and weep this link. Watt's up with that?
  7. Yeah like surpluses and not fighting in Iraq. Thanks for proving my point btw.
  8. Cons have a great ability to make stuff up about the so called liberal media.
  9. I recall many times when righties whined about what the Libs did so don't hand me that pile of steaming dong.
  10. Wow, there's a shock. Signed by zero climate scientitsts. Like going to your mechanic for a second opinion on protate cancer.
  11. The models have grossly under predicted the warming we are going to see in the next fifty years.
  12. That has to be one of the dumbest things I have ever heard.
  13. Cons fly on the tax payers dime.....good. Libs fly on the tax payers dime.....bad. Cons build gazebos on our dime and hide it from parliment.....good. Libs go on shopping sprees on our dime....bad. Cons run up a huge deficit and debt....good. Libs run up a huge deficit and debt.....bad. You can swap the good and bad depending on your political ideology.
  14. Yeah, Trump won't be happy until he sees Bin Ladens long form death certificate.
  15. Well heck, if they can find out where they can join thier brother swimming among the fishes. The Obaminator strikes.....yes we can.....find and kill Bin Laden.
  16. Don't want to give his followers a place to worship or Martyr him. Brilliant move.
  17. It's funny, Bin Laden killed by Obama. A a spooky black socialist Kenyan Muslim does something no Republican could. Bush 0 Obama 1 Not only that, the CIA under Obama found the douche bag and kept it secret since August. Can't wait to see Republican'ts struggle with this one.....isn't that right Mr. Trump?
  18. The only reason that this has become a big issue is because the poor guy is dead. This situation begs the question of how many times do police use this course of action when the cameras aren't on. I'll bet dollars to donuts that all four coppers walk with zero punishment. They shouldn't be but they are above the law. :angry:
  19. Tell that to the assholes lobbing rockets into Isreal. Tell me, how do you negotiate with a government that wants Isreal wiped off the map and continues to fire missles indescriminatly into your neighborhoods?
  20. Terror begets terror. Perhaps instead of violence Hamas should use diplomacy, otherwise they had better get use to death. May I add that most of the aid Palastinians get is from Isreal itself, why aren't Arab countires doing more to help them? Muslims around the world unite to comdem Isreal but are strangly silent when Hamas launches rockets into Isreal.....why? Isreal is doing the right thing.
  21. LinkOr how about Mann's famous hockey stick? LinkI found most devastating this article: LinkThe principle of global warming is perfectly sound. What is lacking is a clear understanding of how much human activities influence the atmosphere. ---- Rajendra Pachauri is the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The IPCC, working under a UN mandate, made the recent report in Paris that has attracted so much attention. In 2005, Pachauri passed the Godwin point and compared Bjørn Lomborg to Adolf Hitler because Lomborg asks questions about global warming. Is this a way to conduct serious debate? I would expect such on this forum - but not from someone of such stature. SlatePachauri has an interesting background. He sits on the board of State-owned Indian Oil Corporation. He is not a climatologist but rather a resource economist and furthermore, the Left accused him of being the choice of Bush and ExxonMobil for the position of IPCC chairman. And who is Bjørn Lomborg? Link For the third time, at least, the National Post has painted a respected international academic as a climate change "denier," regardless that the scientist is no such thing. In the most recent instance part of a 10-part series called "The Deniers" - writer Lawrence Solomon (left) justifiably lauds the work of that "Nigel Weiss, Professor Emeritus at the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics at the University of Cambridge, past President of the Royal Astronomical Society, and a scientist as honoured as they come." But Solomon then steps way over the line of accurate journalism. He says that Weiss believes "The science is anything but settled ... except for one virtual certainty: The world is about to enter a cooling period." Weiss was so offended by this mischaracterization that he issued a news release, saying "Professor Nigel Weiss, an expert in solar magnetic fields, has rebutted claims that a fall in solar activity could somehow compensate for the man-made causes of global warming." “Although solar activity has an effect on the climate, these changes are small compared to those associated with global warming,” Weiss said in the news release. “Any global cooling associated with a fall in solar activity would not significantly affect the global warming caused by greenhouse gases." The Post has not yet seen fit to acknowledge Dr. Weiss' position with a correction. Which is not so surprising when you look back in the series. The first story in "The Deniers" series featured Dr. Edward Wegman, a professor at the Center for Computational Statistics at George Mason University. Dr. Wegman had testified before a Senate committee last year, criticizing the use of statistics in the now-famous graph known as the "Mann hockey stick." But Wegman told the committee that he and his fellow statisticians "were not asked to assess the reality of global warming and indeed this is not an area of our expertise. We do not assume any position with respect to global warming except to note in our report that the instrumented record of global average temperature has risen since 1850 according to the MBH 99 chart by about 1.2º centigrade." He's no denier. The Post's second story featured Dr. Richard S.Tol, and claimed that Tol believes climate change, if it is occurring, will be beneficial. Per this earlier post, however, Tol also acknowledges the human causation of climate change and supports action to stop it. Again, no denier. There are other questionable stories in this series. For example, Solomon quotes the research of Henrik Svensmark of the Danish National Space Center, as proof that cosmic rays are affecting the earth's temperature. But while Solomon implies that the sun is therefore the principal cause of climate change, Svensmark says clearly in this paper that that his work "does not imply that other factors can not affect clouds or climate." The most committed denier in this series appears to be no scientist, but rather the writer, Lawrence Solomon.
×
×
  • Create New...