madmax

I don't think I'd hate someone that appointed me a citizenship judge. There is no cushier spot... So this guy scored pretty good eh?

I would be hard pressed to see the NDP squeeze out one more vote out of a person whom voted Liberal Prior. If the campaign were to have gone two more weeks, I think the Conservatives would be able to squeeze a little more from the Liberals, if Harper continued to be level headed.

This poll is really playing with numbers. Rather than explain the progressive nature of it, here is another polling question. Nothing has happened in 2 years to create radical change of opinion. Here is another question Here is another question None of these polls are going to change any anti abortion of pro choice views. Neither is trying to spin the numbers.

IN ROEVWADE the women had the baby to win the case. Kinda ironic. Mulroney had two MAJORITY governments. Strange he couldn't get it to pass? The Supreme court Rulings are clear, and available at wikipedia. So they would have had the trouble that the Majority Mulroney Parliments would have had? Well, there you have it. That's quite a reality. Yes they do. They are open and honest about their position. The Conservatives are not. They just want anti abortionists to vote for them. Harper clearly said he wasn't going to change abortion laws. What other political party has an anti abortion policy. Christian Heritage Party is a political party. Other Religions have no political party that supports their pro-life movements, but can choose CHP to represent these values if they wish. Or you can choose this slider.

For these positions? Back to you Expectant mothers already know there is a social safety net there for them! It is these same mothers whom I hear ostricised in every Tim Hortons in Canada. The CHP Candidate offered $10,000 to the expecting mother. However here is their Family Platform Actually, having heard the CHP platform, it was the only party to address your concerns above, at an all Candidates meeting. The Conservative Candidate was driven out into the open, to actually come out and say he personally wouldn't change anything. It was a shock since a large anti abortion lobby was present and were brought there by the former Canadian Alliance Candidate, whom he defeated for the nomination. The CHP have a very concise policy platform, Here is there policies. http://www.chp.ca/partyPolicy/ Yup, even I can't bang off a proper true/false question. Sure sounds like CHP to me. It's also a question whether we want to continue to spend more time on the subject. Everyone has an analysis.

Newsflash! The CONSERVATIVES are the governing party and have made some overtures towards missile defence Norad/Nato etc. But lets look at the recent past. While I am not impressed with the Liberal role towards the Canadian Military, I don't think it can be fairly said with regards to the BMD that Paul Martin Supported.

2000 2004 2006 They used attack adds prior to this as well. In 2004 they were effective, but Harper put the nail in his own coffin by saying Martin supported Pedophiles, and then hid in a trailer during the final week. In 2006 the Liberal attacks were undermined by their credibility issues, and the NDP didn't feed the scare mongering provided by the Liberals. Obviously when attack advertising fails, it goes very badly. Kim Campbell era comes to mind. The Liberals attacking the United Church Minister in Gerard Kennedys riding. The NDP attacks in London against the Liberal Candidate and his conservative campaign manager. When it doesn't work it is complete collapse.

Do you have an article, proof, something to back up that the USA is pulling a battle group out of Iraq? In fact, I have information suggesting the opposite.

What a bunch of whiners. I am trying to figure out which is worse, the disgruntled Liberals, the Liberals, or the CPCs for taking opportunists like Wajid Khan and Emerson. To bad so sad.

IIRC the US and the USSR both did similar tests back in the 80s. Hardly a need for missile defence. Here is the peace answer, it is Jaw Jaw not missile defence. and those that don't advocate talk. Choose trade as the better leverage, not missile defence.

You buy into every conspiracy theory out there.

Did it pass?

Fair enough. People can start a topic here, the topic could say "Boycott Uranus" People can put forth a motion by submitting it. As for the Boycott motion with regards to OSSTF. The two motions for and against were withdrawn.

The article was subscription. If someone else mentioned that the other sponsor was a muslim, so be it.

Whoa, David Duke nearby? Zionist Controled media? There is a corporate media. There are many factors in that media. There is media in the US which often follows the government support of Israel which has remained tight with the country through many difficult times. The votes in the United Nations don't mean anything when we address those that are pointing the fingers. Some of the biggest Human Rights violaters in the world. If there was a motion that said the world is flat and Israel committs war crimes, it would pass. But that doesn't mean that there is not the broad coverage of the Palestinian situation in Canada. It is why people can neither understand nor empathize with Palestinians, be them Christian or Muslim. But you want to spew this Zionist conspiracy crap. Maybe you can talk with Scriblett. Your thought processes have alot in common with the problems in Israel, regarding dialog and empathizing with one another. You blame Zionist conspiracys Scriblett blames unions

I do not disagree with your comments above. Just the radical hype I have read here, almost makes the strangeness of the BofED seem excusable.

So why didn' t you post that the origin of the motion was Jewish? The fact that this was a subscription article, and you keep harping on the Union, tells me this is just a hatchet job on your part. The motion was defeated because it was stupid.

Their are those that suggest pre-empting nuclear threats. Iraq, Iran, North Korea come to mind. There are countries that have given up Nuclear technology South Africa, and those that gave up programs Libya. So, you have Identified Pakistan as a potential major threat, that is being prevented by a sole military dictator, whom has elements within his own that could overthrow him with the support of the ISI and Islamic Fundamentalists. You don't believe in applying pressure on Pakistan to give up its nuclear weapons, as it provides a threat to us? Something about the mountains makes this extremely difficult. Afghans and foreign fighters aren't being trained and recruited in Afghanistan, but Pakistan which Afghanistan can do nothing about. I hope you don't know what special ops are doing Particulary if they ever operated in Pakistan. If an incident occurred inside the Pakistan border, with ground forces, I would think that this in itself could cause the populace to begin to undermine Mushy, and your concerns about his overthrow be even more possible. Hmm, I am starting to like this part. What bothers me about Mushy, is that when he and Karzai were feuding publicly, and the media questioned Pakistani actions, he could only reply, that he couldn't talk because he had a book deal.

Silly Girl Eh.

Determining the level of Taliban Sympathyzing is the key. Obviously, more people are swaying back towards the Taliban in the past year. This is troubling that such a thing would occur five years on. There are reason behind this, and like Army Guy suggests, the Taliban play for the peoples attention, sympathy, and support just like our forces try to do. If someone is mentioning that we are making mistakes, that is making it easier for the Taliban to gain support, vs erode Taliban support, and they view the Taliban as the enemy, I would take these comments very seriously and not brush them off as silly girls.

Start a Candu thread, you are straying quite alot with the jingle without furthering the discussion.

Nope won't change a thing for them, whenever we choose to leave. We could leave tommorrow, or in 20 years, as long as a deaf ear is turned to the Women seeking their rights, like has just occurred, there will not be changes for the better. Regardless, While I feel for RAWA and them attaining their freedom, Canadian Soldiers cannot provide such a cultural change. This is going to take Generations and education to get Afghan Society away from the stone age. Islamic Fundamentalism is so ingrained into the culture since the USSR invasion, I really do think it is foolish to think our presence today tommorrow or in 50 years is going to make a difference. That is why I laugh each time someone here states all the benefits that the invasion has provided Afghan women in terms of freedom.

Supporting and Exporting Terrorism.

Maybe this guy would applaud the teaching of Anti Semitism Maybe this guy would applaud the teaching of Anti Semistism Just thought I would add a Liberal Leadership Candidate, and a Conservative Leadership Candidate. Both with alleged and/or proven anti-semetic views. We have hate laws, and the list of people whom say stupid anti semetic or anti jewish teachings are not sitting in one political party. People of bad intent lurk in all the parties based on other issues outside of their racist intent.

What a load of bollocks. You could insert Liberal, Conservative or Green into the above and it would be rubbish. The party that taught anti-semitism were called the NAZIs. There is no Canadian educational branch, government, or board that is going to Teach Anti Semitism. We have anti hate laws. No go spread your BS elsewhere.