guyser

Except in many cases, and disciplines, they generally did have the history right.

Geez wilber, dont bring facts into a debate that is this shallow and stupid. Of course you are correctm but the misguided OP didnt even know about these two prior.

Their own shadow it would appear.

Yes, because the belief did nothing to kill her. It did lead the parents to make a wrong choice but theose things didnt kill her.

Mulcair is Canadian, as Canadian as these dual citizens.... Sir John A Macdonald...sorry make that Prime Minister Sir John a Macdonald Oh and Prime Minister Turner. Damn, this thread is chock full of fun ! Thanks

Now why would we do that? That would be silly Not really for reasons you havent a clue about, but hey, go on...this is fun. There was absolutely no personal attack in my post. But hey, if you havent a clue what you are arguing maybe I should have. Cuz ya know....there is nothing in the Constitution that forbids this. In fact Mulcair could become a Senator tomorrow, legally. See it says..."Disqualification of Senators"...meaning they are already one. Now go read the news for 2013, theres a new Pope and a new future King. Fascinating really. Have a nice day.

Come on now, Harper doesnt do that. He has mionions do it for him.

After a hat trick is scored, play has stopped .

Hopefully the Police/CAS do nothing to the parents. 1) they lost their litle girl. 2) she will be a poster child for the other idiotic parents out there considering the same thing.

Does that growth dildo hurt much? Its gotten really big under the Conservatives

Id be ok wih that, provided some concessions are made, re pricing and expansion.

LOL. Welcome to 2012. Catching up on the news are we? The things Conservatives worry about......so funny. Didja know the housing crash happened too?

Wonder why they dont call Conservative News and Views? Why would anyone....gosh.....use a name not their own?

Are they though? A news release has the real name of the issuer should it be a company

I'll top that one... It was yesterdays news feed on my phone under Yahoo. The story started with a picture and her face was blurred. Next line had a video of them, no blurs to be seen. Young girl will know enough to lie, unless she can use it to weasel out of some charges....so maybe...just maybe

You mean without the ' Brough to you by Steve Harper and the Conservatives' part? ' Thats the probs here boges. True.............and?

I cant really doubt you on the filler aspect, however one easily could think its real news. I looked and nothing really to distinguish that in my one minute look. Now the Buchanan Group and thier ads for P&G seem to me pretty obvious but lots dont think so.

Like canned ham , only for idiots and those with no taste.....nor brains?

And ? Sure doesnt mean the govt of the day cant try and see it through, massively expensive it will be. Oh, like big business ? Guess if big biz can come in and sign agreements for money from the Feds, then fuck it up and leave for the govt to clean up the mess, dont see why anyone else cant or shouldnt.(Ecept big biz doesnt put in addendums for clean up, theyt just shrug and leave)

Relax, they are probably written the same way the in house Timmies ads are done, horribly and amateurishly.

Oh ok thanks. I just figured if the Govt, any of them past and present, made any attempt to settle the claims we could then be done with it. I'm thinking Naive would be held for someone who thinks they speak for all the FN's of this country. A lot of BS in your statement .

You know, negotiate , meet up, make offers, go through the long and winding rigamarole it will take to settle all the very expensive claims once and for all Well your words dictate that impression. Sick and tired and all that ? Ya know, among others

They werent as stupid as Target. You're right. They spent $5B trying and stupidly failed. Gosh, theres a pattern here. Sure you dont work for Target? Anyways, big box guys here weren't......so stupid and knew it was a stupid move. I guess stupidity was mistake number one? Hmm...someone stupidly paid $1.8B for the leases....I wonder who that was. Wow, imagine if they had another $5B more on the bottom line. Maybe then analysts would say Target was good , instead of what is now being said. All of this in one day too! Tip of the hat for making it obvious how stupid Target was thinking their arrogance would win over some other country.

'They' could probably change it, or rather end it, if the Govts (for and after) paid the bills off. Then we'd be done with it. But I suspect , with your attitude and all, you would whine and complain about that. So in the meantime, enjoy the Constitution and all its laws.

Location challenges...hmm.....did they not know where the stores were? DId they not have a plan? Guess not. Inventory challenge, that must be American speak for "we really had no f'ing clue what to sell nor how, and really, are we to listen to the Canucks we hired to teach us 'Mericans? " "Them northerners will buy the empty space we put on every aisle" Cha....right.