White Doors

Who should we nuke first? The pesky French? How about the Spanish and Portugese for the genocide the perpetuated on our Cod, Halibut and Tuna stocks.. Of course, there is also tyranical Japan.. Killing whales for 'research'.. harummpphh! Orf wit der 'eads!

Yes, agreed. The people who don't see it this way are not stupid, their idealology doesn't allow them.

What? No more nitter nattering? But I like nitter nattering! Charles, you fascist! libertarian my ass!

Some people believe, deep down, that in order to be truly 'equal' we must be the SAME. They cannot tolerate 'difference' in their strict ideaology. It's is akin to a stick in their spokes. They deny it in the face of all logic. Logical, well adjusted people realize there are differences and do not get caught up in them. Celebrate our diversity. That's what it used to be about. Now alot of people don't like this. They pretend that diversity does not exist. This leads to all sorts of slippery slopes. Look at moral equivelency. This is bourne from the same source. Some people are so obsessed with their anti-western PC nazism that they even excuse ACTIONS. I say celebate our cultural and racial diversity and differences and learn from each other. Other people refuse to see it that way and hence - are not able to learn and grow. And it is ok to judge people on their ACTIONS. I believe in equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. But again, that's just me. I do think that if more people thought this way, we would be a better country however.

So are most of the posts/threads at this forum. I can't take this place seriously - or you. Who cares what you think?

No kidding. There is only one race - the human race. The classification of humans by 'race' was the action of racists creating the classifications to match their subjective bias and justify them. The idea of 'races' is no more scientifically established now than it was two hundred years ago. Do you enjoy repeating yourself? You have stated that repeatedly and everyone has addressed it. Your point is moot and repeating it doesn't change that.

just read them. disgusting. On the other hand...Should be a treasure trove for CSIS

actually.. I have seen a few on Springer..

What utter crap and hypocricy! 'Blonde' isn;t a racial sterotype and 'slant eyes' is? WTF? My 10 year old niece could see through this. Yes Kimmy, I noticed. Coincidentally, he is a big defender of native 'rights' - you know, special rights no one else has based purely on gene's? It is quite clear here that it is indeed, ok to be racist against whites. On the other hand, to the PC Nazi's, not only is it not alright to be racist if you ARE white, it is not even tolerable that we speak (nay, think) of Caucasians as BEING a race. What does it say about one's Intelligence if you can't even question something that you were fed when you were 6 years old?

Was that the North Pole or South Pole talking? Magnetic or geographic? LOL

Nope. Roll another one and it will be come clear to you. have a good weekend.

Once was enough, but I appreciate your efforts.

I still smoke from time to time. Not sure what your point is? Please try to stick to the subject at hand. People who know better than you or I have already corrected you on your theories. Ok then.. We were talking about your "theory", not you - but you go ahead and talk to yourself if you like. Thank you for ackowledging that you were wrong in your own 'special way'.

Uhmmm.. yes.. You were postulating on the conditions of combat and the soldiers mental state. Actual soldiers with actual combat experience corrected your 'theory' with real life experience and examples. Excuse me if I take their actual experience over your drug induced 'theory' [quoteYeah, I'm proud that I'm an expert at least a far as an amature(associate degree in then environmental field,) and many other things that you don't even understand exist as well as, marijuana, LSD, political science. You have yet to provide any proof of you being an expert on military matters. In fact, the things that you have postulated on this thread have been thoroughly discredited. I doubt that matters to you though as you have demonstrated an intellectual ignorance and arrogance on here that shows me and others that you are incapable of learning from others. Irionically, that 'voracious' appetite of yours for knowledge is a waste as you have demonstrated a lack of ability to learn from anyone/anything. ie: You are wrong but you don't care. As you were soldier.

That is the kind of shit that belongs on Stormfront. I don't understand why you say that?

I see. So you ARE saying that you DO know better. Gotcha. An expert in canibis AND military. By the way, They did win hands down in Iraq - in fact, they won too easily it can be argued. It is the peace that they are having a hard time with. You predicted nothing. Your sense of self is hyper inflated. And if you were truly that clever, you would know the difference between 'loose' and 'lose'.

My god.. It is true. People WILL whine and complain about absolutely everything. unbelieveable.

KO2 You are definitely the most self absorbed person I have ever met.

Oh my god you ar an idiot. You think you know better than the men that have served? Are you actively trying to be disrespectful?

The salute dates back many years, used as a greeting, the empty hand showed you were unarmed, it was also a sign of respect for all who recieved it. Today our military uses it to pay thier respect to the Queens commision, or officers. and in rare circumstances i've seen non commision members salute other non commision members in a form of the highest respect, it is also customary for all members to salute flags, statues, and coffins or thier cars. Which comes down to your question, would it be good manners, Yes it would, would others who have served mind , No they should'nt, it is a sign of respect that is all. it would be a personal choice hand over heart or salute. it's the intention that counts. Thanks Army guy

certainly allowable, but tacky. Double tacky if you are bare headed. Ahhh.. so not considered good manners. thanks, I was thinking that, but wasn't sure. So, hats in hand for civilians and berets on for soldiers and veterans who salute. Gotcha, thanks Ann.

haha that's the best way to enjoy it.

Question - Is it allowable, or considered in good manners, for a civilian to salute on these occasions or can only other solders and veterans do so? Anyone know?

omg.. what a maroon! haha

Now THAT makes me proud to be Canadian. Excellent job!