Jump to content

White Doors

Member
  • Posts

    3,664
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by White Doors

  1. Yes, you are correct. I am dense for thinking a HRC should have a reputation of fairness and not be under investigation by the RCMP. I am dense for thinking that the state should not be censoring free speech in order to compensate for 'hurt feelings'. Yes, are indeed correct that I am dense because I disagree that a quasi-extra judical 'board' can make decisions that are markedly different from the law of the land and the supreme court with impunity. Yes, I am dense that an appointed clique or PC fanatics can ignore all normal rules of discovery and evidence and to not allow truth to be a defence. If you think that this is ok, feel free to continue with the insults - maybe I will go to the HRC and have you censored for calling me dense.
  2. Sorry, my mistake - I was thinking you had seriously thought of this subject before posting.
  3. well you obviously haven't read the book because he is not a historian nor is his book about history. lol but you continue on dismissing people's right to free speech because you do not disgaree with what they are saying (even if you don't bother to see what it is they are saying). after they are gone, they will come for others until they get to you and you will have no one to come help defend your rights too. edit to add: this actually descibes your attitude on this matter. ironic you use it to attack others. maybe you are starting to see the light after all.. but I doubt it - more likely you ARE just that completely un self aware.
  4. Actually, you are wrong. Warman is a former emplyee working in the same office as the CHRC and he is the only one to EVER bring a complaint forward to the CHRC in regards to chapter 13 of the free expression part. Oh, and he has WON everyone of his cases. You think that is normal? You think that his being a former emplyee and still using the offices of the CHRC.. Plus the fact they are being investigated by the RCMP for trolling for racists by using racist language on a message board.... and you still think that they don't instigate them? That's Ignorance on your part. Either you don't know or don't care.
  5. ? Only if you think Jews aren't humans? And I know you are not saying that. Think about what you are sayign here What IS a hman rights award then?
  6. Sure they have lawyers for advice in matters, but when they actually have to litigate, do you think they use the lawyers that they have on staff or the lawyers who are experience litigators? Edit - great post August. my thoughts exactly.
  7. Yes, and is there anything wrong with that? Zionism is the creation of Israel, the right to self determination for the Jewish settlers that lived there. The same thing has been offered to the Palestinians but it get's repeatedly rejected as they are seemingly more interested in the Jews NOT being there than they are for a second Palestinian sovereign nation.
  8. ummm... Islam?
  9. you obviously have never retained the services of a lawyer. lol
  10. Not likely, but we can take your reaction to this award as a good indicator of future behaviour.
  11. ummm.. So? You think the costs are the same wether the are active in litigations or not? seriously?
  12. yes and kind of not a big deal at all. meanwhile, a palestinian crane operator goes wild in the streets of Jerusalem killing and maiming lots of Jews and kuzadd and buffy are no where to be seen. Odd ain't it? I just wish they could be courageous anti-semites.
  13. Nah, you would complain that he didn't cure aids so therefore hates gay people.
  14. Not sure about that as you are FTA, a handle - not a person with a name and address. I am unsure if I would be able to defame 'FTA' as FTA is not a legal entity. A ruling on this matter can only be a few years away.
  15. Now we just have to wait for the BCHRC to render their judgement. I secretly hope Macleans loses so we can get rid of all of these kangaroo courts.
  16. and yet, the sky hasn't fallen!
  17. Ok, have you heard an acoustimass before? I;m not saying that Bose are the best. Are they better than kenwood 3 way tower speakers from your $1100 stereo set you got in 1992? very much. Are they the best? No. Totem, which I cited above, make better quality speakers in my opinion, but they cost much more too. You are the one who brought up amplifiers, although I am unsure of why. Actually, I have no idea what you are really going on about other than you have a bvery negative opinion of Bose for some reason that is not grounded in reality.
  18. Obviously you are unfamiliar with acoustimass. also, Bose does not make stand alone amplifiers/receivers.
  19. wow, you are really stretching now. careful of your back. The whole problem you have is that you are treating the word 'religion' in the same vein of 'fanaticism'. They are not interchangeable. You can be a fanatical Islamicist, but surely you are not trying to tell us that every muslim is a fanatic are you? My my my.... You can also be a fanatic and NOT be religious. You don't have to look very far back into history to see people commit suicidal acts for any other number of creeds, tribes, nationalism and racism. I'll leave it to you to do your own research.
×
×
  • Create New...