Black Dog

Nah just against murdering pigs.

MFW I see Derek Chauvin got stabbed in the prison he'll spend the next 22 years in:

This is exactly the same logic you reject when it comes to shooters with right wing beliefs, but its clear you're a hypocrite. And it's funny that your one example is exactly the same one I predicted you'd use because you nitwits are nothing if not predictable. The stuff about falling down right wing conspiracy rabbit hole is literally straight from the perpetrator's mouth. Your claim was, specifically, that in such events, the media wouldn't cover any racist movtives, but this is from your article: Ooops! Yes because the political beliefs are irrelevant unless they are the motivation for the actions, you simpleton. Even if I were to accept the Nashville shooting as an example of a left wing politically motivated attack, the scoreboard is still heavily slanted in favour of right wing murderers because right wing beliefs are fundamentally violent. Nothing sadder than seeing someone try and strut around like a winner after sh*tting their pants in public lol.

You are aware the killer attended the school, right? Like they didn't just randomly select a Christian school. He was a nutjob who followed right wing political commentators and believed in Q Anon adjacent conspiracy theories. Difference here is one of those things has happened multiple times and the other is just a figment of your imagination. You said "a crap tonne of the recent shootings in 2023 were by leftleaning people" so let's see some examples where there' sany evidence of political motivation.

Because the families of the victims and the school itself are suing to prevent its release. Ask them why.

I'm guessing they're going to claim, without evidence, that a couple of recent school shootings perpetrated by LGBTQ people were politically motivated.

Because not everyone arrested was a rioter. No I've specifically talked about killings where there's an obvious political motivation, not Joe blow Republican voter shoots his neighbour type stuff. A crap tonne you say? Name some then. You're babbling. Gee i wonder why a people who subscribe to an authoritarian, reactionary ideology like you would be uninterested in rising up against injustice. Not my argument but I understand why you have to misrepresent it to avoid the painful truth. Also the irony of you whining about this when you're literally claiming a few hundred people arrested in connection with rioting (guilty or not) are representative of millions of left-leaning voters. Hard to take this seriously when you won't even admit there's a political angle to those crimes.

Wouldn't have mattered and you would just pretend they didn't do it even if they had (which they probably did, I'm not bothering to waste time producing more evidence for you to ignore). They were, hence the manifestos. No that's 13 people who left manifestos. There have been numerous other shootings committed by individuals with right-wing beliefs, to say nothing of the various plots that have been foiled, or the constant flood of death threats by right wing folks. Not for nothing have right wing extremists been identified as the number one domestic terrorist threat. Constantly repeating a false claim doesn't make it suddenly true. "antifa are fascist" and we have rightwing ****** bingo! Ohhhhhh your a George Floyd truther, makes sense. Must chap your ass that pig Chauvin is rotting in jail for the rest of his life, huh. As for the rest, you continue to prove my point that no level of evidence will ever be accepted by people like you who's entire worldview is predicated on ignoring evidence.

In a May 31 post on his blog shortly after George Floyd’s death, he wrote, “Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not. Violence that guts and shutters businesses that serve the community is not.” ” At a speech in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on June 2, he said, “There’s no place for violence, no place for looting or destroying property or burning churches or destroying businesses […] we need to distinguish between legitimate peaceful protest and opportunistic violent destruction After protests in downtown Portland, Ore., for every night for nearly three months following Floyd’s killing, Biden said Aug. 30 in a statement while campaigning: "I condemn violence of every kind by anyone, whether on the left or the right." That's three different statements condemning and denouncing violence within the span of a few months but don't let facts penetrate your thick skull. Your projecting right now, right here. lmao.

The cops couldn't stop the riots, what actions were BLM supposed to take? Of the 18 shooters listed, 13 were right wingers. Your specific claim was the shooter "did it becasue of what bernie sanders said." You have a source for that? Do you think radical islamists are left wingers? lol. You're literally lying to me and to yourself here. Your response here is literally just "I know you are but what am I" lol. I'd tell you to go back to the playground, but I have a feeling you aren't allowed within 200 meters of one. Like i said to the other one of you nitwits: there's no evidence you would accept because you're impervious to any statement that threatens your worldview/preexisting beliefs and ideology.

All this statement proves is that there's no evidence you would accept because you're impervious to any statement that threatens your worldview/preexisting beliefs and ideology. Once again, you're simply projecting here. You and your fellow travellers in this thread all believe you are victims and white conservative males are an oppressed minority. True or false? So are toddlers and people with oppositional defiant disorder.

Asked and answered above. He also incited the mob in the first place lol.

I don't consider having a bunch of people with single digit IQs yell at me on a message board to be "losing". Also my insults are far more clever than anything you micropenises have thrown at me.

Going from "They didn't denounce the riots" to "they did but they didn't mean it" or "they did but not hard enough" like that other dummy said is just moving the goalposts. Accept the fact that you are wrong. I'm not, but I think you, specifically, should be.

They denounced it, you simply don't think the terms they used were strong enough, there's no where for this discussion to go because you simply are operating on a plane of reality of which you are the sole occupant. I should just start doing what you guys do and invent whole new realities out of the ether and pretend that they are the truth.

My theory is the violence was largely precipitated by apolitical opportunists and, in some cases, agents provocateur. The problem with this is your guys keep leaving manifestos detailing their beliefs and why they're committing mass murder. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_manifestos_of_mass_killers This is made up. It never happened. Brenton Tarrant alone killed twice as many people as died during an entire summer of BLM protests.

So those people didn't say the things the article says they said regarding the riots? CNN just invented the quotes? Why? I'm just a guy on a message board. The specific claims I was addressing named several of the Democrats who are on record speaking out against violence.

Is this a joke because "sure they denounced the violence but they didn't do it in terms I consider strong enough" cannot be a serious attempt at an argument. If those denunciations aren't strong enough, wait until you see Republican's responses to the Jan. 6 insurrection.

See, I don't think a bunch of strawmen arguments and question-begging is a meaningful contribution but i literally have responded to you in good faith and got condescension and faux tough guy posturing back so what do you expect.

You're retarded. https://barackobama.medium.com/how-to-make-this-moment-the-turning-point-for-real-change-9fa209806067

This is easy: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/13/fact-check-democrats-have-condemned-violence-linked-protests/3317862001/

I don't think you understand: I'm no more interested in a "debate" with you than I am in entering a turd-throwing contest with a chimpanzee because, in this case, it's the same thing. Someone who claims with a straight face that every single left winger supported riots during the BLM protests is simply not an individual who is interested in or capable of a good faith discussion and is only worth mocking.

No, your posts are a gusher of random statements and baseless claims with no evidence or citations filtered through your diseased mind. Like the idea that someone like Obama or Trudeau supported rioting because they said positive things about the BLM movement at large is the kind of thing someone could only believe if they had been dropped on their heads from a great height. It's always projection with you turds.

I tried, but you guys are just too dumb to follow along .