Black Dog

You are too stupid to understand that people are laughing at you here, even people on your s=de of the ideological spectrum. Googled him and lmao: People like you are so funny, you'll listen to any rando off the street who tells you what you want to hear. "How do you even know things" is such a perfect summary of your mindset. Completely ignorant and unwilling to even try and learn anything. So you don't believe me because I'm not personally an expert, but we also shouldn't listen to actual experts either. lol drown yourself in the toilet you living turd.

He quite literally does not and that's why it's an absurd thing to say. Having an entrepreneurial spirit to me suggests a willingness to take risks, to try and start new ventures or seek new opportunities, especially in the private sector. Pee Pee has been safely ensconced in his publicly funded sinecure since he was 24 years old. He's never had a real job, started a business, nothing.

Weird thing to say about a guy who's literally never had a job where he wasn't getting paid by taxpayers.

What's your point, freakshow? No one is arguing that climate change is an extinction level event for humanity. Who TF is Mark Marano, one of your conspiracy bloggers? Does he, like you, also not understand what condensation is? Again, atmospheric CO2 has doubled in the last 100 or so years, which happens to line up with the industrial revolution. Again it's funny how you'll believe just about anything just as long as there's no actual scientific evidence for it.

Lord grant me the confidence of an a$$hole landlord who brags about jacking up rents and evicting vulnerable people posting a link about people struggling to make ends meet because of rising rents.

You know that past natural cycles of warming and cooling have been dictated by changes to atmospheric CO2 levels, right?

It absolutely is, as I clearly illustrated. I can draw you a diagram if you want. Except there's absolutely no reason to think something naturally occurring could not develop through natural processes. No it's easy to understand the logic, but it's a stupid analogy because a watch is not analogous to a natural phenomenon.

Again: the evidence is the increase in global temperatures corresponds with the increase in atmospheric CO2 caused by human activities. What's the alternative explanation for why global temperatures have increased so rapidly?

The world around us is not evidence of god because there are alternative explanation for how everything came to be that are far more plausible and that are actually supported by physical evidence. "God created everything in existence and the proof is the existence of everything" is circular reasoning and a basic failure of logic.

The preponderance of evidence supports the theory of anthropogenic climate change, cope and seethe. This is stupid but it's extra stupid coming from a guy who thinks there's definitive proof of the existence of God. Straight up mental illness at work here.

Case counts in January 2022 alone were higher than the total case count for all of 2020 but the death and hospitalization rates were drastically lower, how can you post so much about a subject and still not understand basic statistics, you crackpot goof?

It's pretty clear you have no idea what "proof" and "evidence" mean. None of that is an argument for not reducing our carbon output especially since it's pretty obvious that anthropomorphic climate change is real. "Man cannot control climate" is a false statement and last I checked, lying was a sin.

LOL says the guy who won't shut up about "the total amount of CO2 man emits is a tiny fraction of the amount of natural greenhouse gases in the atmosphere."

1. The fact that the amount of man-made CO2 in the atmosphere is a relatively low percentage of total is totally irrelevant. 2. Canada's per capita emissions are among the highest in the world and there's no compelling argument for not doing out part to reduce that.

You're right dude the massive increase in atmospheric CO2, a potent GHG, and corresponding increase in global temperatures over the last 100 years is just a coinkydink.

And what's killing phytoplankton?

A belief you have admitted isn't based on any science or data, just a worthless and ill-informed opinion.

Given how many more of those infected people would have died without the vaccine, the answer is quite obviously yes and only an absolute dipshit would say otherwise.

"Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired." Arguing with a Bible thumper about science is a mug's game, but even mug's games can be fun sometimes.

By the drastically reduced case fatality rate.

I didn't say I was in the trades now.

LOL this is just a pu$$y's way of getting out of an argument they're losing. Yeah but I'm not lying like you do.

LOL you're literally retarded. Someone get this guy into a home for very stupid dogs.

Again, if you're too stupid to understand that political worldviews can come through in ways other than overt indoctrination, there's no conversation to be had. I literally did lmao.

You could go re-read the posts and get an appropriate adult to explain it to you. I dunno how much more clear I can get than this: