Sleipnir

I said a scientific journal, it's not even an appropriate 'peer-review'

Interesting enough I haven't given any info yet, already you are jumping the gun This tells me that you're not open to new information that may contradict your dogmatic views. Clearly you have not been reading scientific journals or taken any courses related to climate change.

They also said that sitting around for too long causes cancer.

There are no Quebec NDP.

Understand that a single poll doesn't make a trend. In fact, since the federal election the Nanos poll have been described as an outlier polls. Ekos, Forum Research, Environics, Abacus, Ipsos Reid, Harris Decima, etc have all been reporting similar number. It is suggested that the Nanos poll tend to inflate the Libs number while underestimating the NDPs.

It sure does, many climate change models are predicting similar events throughout the world based on quantitative data that have been gathered around the world.

Do you even know what a strawman opinion is? Or are you just saying that to sound smart?

What are you? Harper's parrot?

Lol people are still arguing in 2012 whether climate change is occurring or not? Like debating whether gravity exists or not.