jdobbin

So you think their strategy was ultimately successful and that if the Liberals want to bear the Tories they should continue to go ahead with those type of ads? Make up your mind.

I suppose your party knows what they are doing but it certainly isn't obvious from the polling. I know that must make you very angry but there it is.

Maybe because they use different strategies now.

I generally have problems comprehending most of what you say.

And Paul Martin was defeated. Are you saying that a strategy that ultimately left a party in defeat is going to work for the Conservatives?

I assume you will not read what is written or generally miss the point like there is no tomorrow.

I think you should read what I said. I said BQ supporters took what Harper said personally even if it wasn't addressed to them.

Can't recall saying that.

You think that most Calgarians believe that Ignatieff was referring to them personally?

Nor you, it would seem. I say it because when Harper attacked the BQ by calling them separatist in English and sovereignists in French, BQ supporters took it personally. They are likely to take this personally as well. Or have the poll numbers not been an indication of that?

Absolute BS. So you think Harper is right to insinuate that BQ and BQ supporters are soft on pedophiles?

Once again: Dion or Ignatieff? I am looking at the Paul Martin years here.

So you think Ignatieff was speaking about people in Calgary in general?

What Liberal attacks are you referring to, something specific to Ignatieff or Dion?

You don't think that Harper's attacks don't polarize?

You do realize that you are talking about a news story federally in 2006 that widely hurt the Liberals. As for the provincial Liberals, you do know that they are a separate party?

Distraction? You think attacks are a distraction? The success has been removing settlements from Gaza. The failure wad to get Hamas to stop rocket attacks from Gaza. Success is getting settlements out of Gaza and focusing on the West Bank. I think you the one who is acting irrationally. Your lack of recognition of the failure of disengagement is rather breathtaking. The Israelis and Palestinians don't want that. Admit that your plan is not supported by anyone including those involved with the conflict.

I'm sorry if you can't get it.

I was mocking his statement. It was as over the top as Duceppe's. The accusations of supporting pedophiles from both sides is ridiculous.

I was making fun of the other poster who said all other parties are soft on crime. Getting it yet?

It isn't just about crime. It says the BQ are not protecting children and that they are soft on the issue. To emphasize the point, they have a man leading away a child. You know full well the message is that the BQ are soft on pedophiles. Gutter politics.

I think you are losing it. I was raising Duceppe's comments because they are as over the top as Harper's are. Duceppe was trying to say the Tories wanted to put children in prison so they could be raped by adults as some sort of punishment. Harper is trying to say that the BQ is soft on pedophiles. Understandable, both comments soured people on politicians in general.

There has also been no stop in the attacks from rockets or other violent incidents from Palestinians. Nevertheless, Gaza no longer has settlements. I'll be hear to remind you always that your idea of disengagement doesn't work whereas engagement does. We are wanted by both sides and that is enough in most people's minds to try and assist the process. Dobbin:I think your getting angry that no one seems to take your disengagement idea seriously. And you adamantly refuse to believe that even the Palestinians and Israelis don't want anything to do with your disengagement.

How about 14 year olds in prison: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/story/2...25/duceppe.html

The flyer has a picture of a man leading a child away. What d you think that means? Tell me, please. I'd really like to know. This is the caption: You think that no one could possibly make the connection of the Tories accusing the BQ of being soft on pedophiles?