login

I could balance their budget without cutting services. The problem is the model of revenue solicitation is all wrong. The basis of student funding is all wrong. Until they set up working systems for this it will be a burdeon. The key is to set up self supporting fund streams rather than directive streams. Also things like including more co-operative education is an important factor.

Although I think it is possible there have been instances, this is the first time I think 9 of the judges have all been one party. I think in the past there were only 5 or 7 judges, but this is 9 and 8 of the nine nominated by the PM. I think it would be great to know if any of them are card carrying members of a political party, or how they vote or if they have ever donated to a political party.

You havn't answered the question, what social programs does the Federal Government provide to the poor? You claim that there is some type of security in Canada but havn't identified it. You've only said the poor are bad people, then ask me to give you a break?

So you are ok with Syria and Syrian rebels indisciminantly using Sarin, Mustard Gas, and potentially even VX? http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_12_11/Chemical-arms-rhetoric-prelude-to-Syria-invasion/

What in terms of visibility?

Residential Schools. Its not like kids arn't taken from First Nations homes, the part I'd like to see investigated is the potential money trail... It seems unbeleivable but seems eerily familiar. http://www.wearecominghome.com/

Its just politics on the face of it the guy wasn't a bad guy. His only issue in a western context was that he was with 'the enemy'. You don't need to hate 'the enemy' or demonize them on false grounds to fight them. Try to be real you will find it lets you live in 'the real world' rather than one that is fabricated and filled with potholes which will ruin your car, and spoil your drive. If you don't stick to the truth you will go off course.

http://rabble.ca/new...g-die-my-people Spence: "I am willing to die for my people because the pain is too much and it's time for the government to realize what it's doing to us." Rabble: 'She says she will consume only water, and is not afraid to die if it comes to that. "If that's the journey for me to go, I'll go."'

Well put up a pick of an f-16 then.

Sarin really isn't that evil. It is not really much more effectve than a bomb, but it causes less physical damage and low grade shelters won't protect from it. The bad ones are the stuff US and Russia have in stockpile like VX, and the seriouslly endangering biological weapons Sarin is just a killer it isn't "dangerous" outside the zone of deployment. GBU bombs are more dangerous. I'm very skeptical of your by the end of the year timeline. I would say if anything moves it will be atleast 4 months from now if that. Unless Nato goes in it will continue to be a proxy war for some time. But there appears to be a plan but I would geuss it has to be within the next month or two unless they change up the Naval deployments. I don't think Turkey has the stomach for it. They are big and they are tough but they are all about beating up on minorities not governments. That is why the chemical weapons were moved to the North, Turkey is the muscle in any invasion and they will get hit with gas if they move in, in force. Right now Natos deployments in Syria are relatively small in number and in part false flag ops, spec ops. They won't move in regulars until it is convienient to obey the rules of war. War with Syria = War with Iran If Turkey goes into Iran, Iran will attack Turkey. In that type of mega scenario it wouldnot be unthinkable that Russia went in, and China might feel compelled. Which Nato might be down for because it has the flex, but it is not just a simple invasion of Syria. Iran is on the periphrial of the Shanghai 5 group (SCO) If a "war" occured it would be devastating and felt.

Accredation of their training and "training" are two seperate things. It is reasonable to provide an accredation service, perhaps with a deferred payment, while the training if not an in demand feild then people should pay like everyone else, but it is reasonable to allow for student loans, if the field is in demand or even pay for the training if only a couple terms if they agree to stay in Canada for a given period of time and service an in demand area.

Why did you add this shot?

I find this problematic it isn't legal to set up teepees on parliament hill.

What is the difference?

Well the other point raised in that their income includes: other” remuneration relates to all other sources of revenue – not just actual salaries... ... The bottom line: AFN’s recalculation of the original figures provided to the CTF by INAC confirms that no First Nation elected official in Canada earns more than the Prime Minister. See: http://www.afn.ca/up...on_salaries.pdf But yes if someone has a job as a mayor and another as a military reservist, and another as a csis agent, and another as a head of a corporation executive and another as an advisor to a congolmerates council, people would have multiple incomes from that. Take Paul Martin for example, his only salary was not from being PM, he apparently makes 5.5 Million USD sorry that was for Hockey night in Canada. Was it wrong for Paul Martin to earn income as PM and owner of CSL? http://www.csl.ca/

The article refered to "special interest tax credits" basically the idea I saw was to not give any preferential treatment within the income tax system. Which I would suppose taxes in general would reduced but special activities would not. It basically would take away the "geuss work" of making claims in taxes, and leave it to a baseline figure based on income, so people are taxed on income rather than how they use the money. The reason I like it is because it tears down part of the bloat of the income tax system. It is part of the way toward removing income taxes entirely, which are a highly inefficient system of raising revenue.

Cheifs have multiple roles, I'm not sure how this works out exactly. That is definately a high salary but it likely includes multiple roles as well as other forms of renumeration.

People have the right of freedom of association. True it is essentially martial law if civil discourse of free individuals fails, most people subject themselves overlordship. In an equal society we are peers, but binding law is only possible through consent to be ruled. To clarify the natural person thing, fundamentally I do not support the concept of state control of individuals, and I live in accordance to that. But this is not about me, but the discussion was turned to me. I think association is fundamentally a situation of choice, and in a free society no one lords another. Democracy is only in place by free assocation. This is more a discussion point for political theory though, not first nations patience waning. The only thing fundamentally required is to exercise reason. I have to add my use of natural person does not directly associate with the natural person tax theory, although I do agree people do not need to pay taxes, but they will be attacked if they try to resist capture if they do not and it would create a state of war and a breach of the peace if they do not, because Canada is willing to kill people (and will commit genocide) against people who do not pay taxes they have on their list of tax payers if they resist force with force (you might say rebel/revolt but rebellion is not required for the free they are already seperate from the structure attacking them, seperate states). Sounds crazy but it is true. The fundamental is to enslave all people they claim and make the subjects of the crown. (Sounds insane and is not practical for most people who are willing people of Canada) Fundamentally I am libertarian and that is what I support in my Canada, afterall we are entitled to our opinion, state infingement onthe invidual can only be upheld by self defence against oppression by the forces willing to suppress their government through malignant governance processes. They infringe individual liberties for their own agenda. Natural persons recognize that all humanity is under natural law as opposed to law made by oppressors that try to remove freedoms and individual rights for their own selfish gains, and they are willing to kill to insure people are enslaved to their rule but natural law allows individuals to be free, but they must be willing to defend their rights. In the past this was more possible due to available land though, today it creates more the notion of a David vs. a thousand Goliaths. they only come after you if you fall within their sphere of interest though, because they dominate all, and attack any who are not subjugated to their rule. That is just where the world is at. As a natural person I defend my rights and am willing to die for my beleifs, not in an act of offence or aggression but as part of my fundamental right to exist as a free person that is not subjected to alien rule that violates my conscience. I am not above the law we are with the law, Canadian law however is "artificial" a fiction for persons who submit to Canadian rule. Life is diplomacy for me not beaurocracy. All people are individuals it is not a machine. But to restate they will kill if we resist their enslavement of us or they will die a thousand Goliaths. But life isn't about biology it is about experience and having good intent in your actions. For me any tax payment is part of the cost of doing business, I don't file taxes, but sure I pay taxes when I buy goods. I don't attempt to evade tax payment I just wont be delegated to do work for the government via legal levy. I have invited the CRA to audit me, they wont and told me to just put anything I want on it and mail it in. Not required. I have no legal obligation to file taxes, but two scenarios exist.. 1. If I know I owe taxes, I need to pay (If i don't know I can presume I don't - as there is no ill intent or mens rhea to evade), 2. if I do owe I can choose to breach the peace and accept war with Canada if they opt to kill me if I resist payment. That is just the reality of it. Sure it is breaking the peace if I choose not to pay, but it is Canada breaking the peace by imposing their rule on me, I am not morally at fault. The Mennonites have this same sort of situation. If I am not enfranchised, I do not have representation and it is a violation of my constitutinal rights and I am not bound to pay taxes due to the fundamentals of the Westminster system. The constitution and common law trump as they are supreme to Parliamentaty statute.

I'm a natural person. (I don't dwell in the same statist existential system as you) They didn't "lose" anything. It is their choice.

http://news.national...ren-for-profit/ Police in Alberta are said to be abducting native children for sale. Before you judge try to read the statements first as if it was a CBC news story.

The reason this is up is because it is signifigant, much like more and more of the upper house being filled with relatively young conservatives. When was the last time the entire supreme court was appointed by one political party? They keep the seats until they are 75.

Emergency Management Canada. (Public Safety) All CF personnel should be NBC trained. It shouldn't be sof http://www.publicsaf.../index-eng.aspx http://www.publicsaf...ersapc-eng.aspx You should be pleased to know that by no later than 2017 there will be a NBC response plan functioning in Canada, and potentially by 2015. Cause what are the chances of the being an NBC issue here in Canada where the NBC and Disaster recovery people are needed for, right?

"Ahmed Said Khadr Born in Egypt, Omar Khadr's father moved to Canada in 1977, where he met and married Maha Elsamnah. You can't use that it was a US interest. Sounds noble to me. Innocent until proven guilty. and how is that being a bad guy? lots of people get arrested in Egypt. Americans kill Pakistani's all the time. This equates to "big deal" He raised money for charity and fought against the soviets during the cold war, sounds heroic to me.

But apparently the cf-18s arn't good enough for Syria, so we can't bomb with them anymore. Hmm, now what do we do, amphibious assaults like Dieppe, won't people die, is there no solution? Yeah I would want to be in that boat... and with chemical weapons being able to hit people on the ground!!!! woe is me.

Maybe you should stop sucking off of native land. Thats been happening a lot longer than natives getting 'handouts' you know there is a reason they do. Because the land you use is theirs.