Rue

Your need to scapegoat someone and make irrational statements again is shared. All refugees are illegal criminals and its their fault. You will eed concentration caps for them genius. Go hire Lavalin.

The most accurate answer was it was spent already on paying back interest on loans. Toronto like many governments spends now and worries about the costs later as its politicians only concern themselves with getting re-elected and not the future. Then the next generations inherit the snowballing interest on previous spending loans. Toronto is a classic example of not engaging in smaller bot continuous expansion sitting on their asses waiting and waiting as construction and supplyprices sky rocketed and the more they wait the more the expenses go up as well as the amount of interest to get paid which scare off mass projects on subways. Its not just the DVP and subways and the Garner, its sewers. Population density and increased rain falls in much shorter time periods is resulting in added expense to the infrastructure as well. According to insurance claims on property damage, we now get the same amount of rain we once got in a week or two weeks or a month, in ten minute bursts. Weather has changed and it causes floods and damage much more than people think. Higher taxes are not exactly possible as Torontonians are already maxed out. I think inevitably the city will put up tolls everywhere like New York City and waste that money too.

Yah for sure. She is set for life now. It was all a conspiracy by her to become PM. Get together with Taxme and share your conspiracy theories. He thinks Jody is one of Bronfman's daughters.

Evidently not in your case when it comes to your wrists.

Check if they are Jews while you are at it.

Oh look who found a rich Jew to blame. Who saw that coming from you. Genius analysis. Bronfman is to blame. You wait long enough this genius will find a "rich" "Jew" to blame for everything but himself.

Ah we all have blood on our hands in a way. Our society is build on the military industrial complex left or right the government may be. The point is none of us on this forum right or left condone terrorism of any kind or extremists of any kind-we would think. Then we all get caught up in rhetoric suggesting some of us think otherwise. Like I said I know Muslim terrorism first hand but I will be damned if it makes me fear or hate Muslims. That is what Muslim terrorists want. Not a chance. It just makes me reach out to peaceful Muslism even more and I was taught that as much by righteous gentiles as I was Muslim terrorists, fellow Jews, etc. There are too many good people out there using their religions or thoughts for peace I will not ignore when this kind of shit happens which means I am an annoying twit on this thread but damn it someone has to remind people that these phacked up things push us to be better not engage in rhetoric that divides. If I sound righteous I do not mean it in an arrogant sense but a genuinely humble one. I just don't get why we can't all see the same sheeyat that comes out of such hatred.

You have a problem covering up the truth Mowich? You can't handle the truth Mowich!!!!!!!!!!!!Sorry I felt like Jack for a second in that movie with Kevin Bacon and Tom Cruise about good men. Why does Tom Cruise have such a high pitched voice and why does he remind me of Trudeau? Who do Trudeau and Morneau remind me of Cary Grant and Randolph Scott? Why does Trudeau look more and more like Mr. Bean in the skit where he was cooking turkey and shoved his head up it? Is it Spring doing this? Why no. It is the pitter patter of dainty Liberal feet flitting about like doing Swan Lake for the masses in an ode to Lavalin. I did like JWR. Suddenly in the middle of this grand spectacle of flitting and pitters and patters, out came Roseanne making a loud fart and poof, the entire audience was left wondering, what the hell happened... Now the fan is turned on but that smell won't leave. Yesterday was the best. There was Billy Boy trying to pirouette and tap dance next to the grinning Cheshire Lord Justin of the Truedough, and all one could hear was, " let her speak". My my you know Mowich being of the Hebrew peoples it sort of reminded me of the expression, "Let My People Go!". Alas in this biblical tale of corruption the Tower of Babel (Babble) has yet to fall but me thinks it shall real soon just like the Mike Duffy ode to Political Obesity never died down. Isn't it ironic that a man who pittered and pattered his dance onto the stage in the name of ethics and transparency accusing the Tories of the opposite, no falls flat on his large posterior with his head stuck up it. I believe Mowich although I claim know expertise in Bhuddism or Hinduism, they call this karma. My people have a Yiddish expression for it- "why would you listen to a fat doctor tell you to go on a diet".

Why is it men who are constipated spend so much time straining over others with this same affliction? Why not share the Immodium? Rue , BS, PP, KA, KA (that was not directed at my colleague Dog it was a rhetorical bleeding heart plea to all of us who need to blame someone when we are all equally as phacked in our own way...I did grow up listening to Janis Joplin, Van Morrison, Joni Mitchell, Maria Muldaur, Jefferson Airplane, etc., like wow man I can not help it)

Of course at this point the "far right" is why according to Eye and how does it relate to a mad man in New Zealand who clearly has no political ideology other than being someone who feels endangered by Muslims. Oh hell why discuss the post topic when you can use it for a selective "leftist" bout of righteousness. Hey now let Eye list all his righteous leftist leaders who have never sold weapons or done business with immoral people .Can not wait. Lol. I can't stand guilt ridden rich boys, i.e., Trudeau, Morneau, and...dare I say it.... Bottom line, the world is full of people, trying to label the phacked ones rightist or leftist is absurd-what makes them phacked is far more complex then these idiotic left and right libels some people use because they are too lazy to figure out the complexities and instead cling to simplistic, black and white labels to suit their rigid, limited cognitive processes. Michael Jackson singing its black its white, ebony and ivory....seems to have been an overwhelming influence for some people on this forum' s positions ddare I mention their names.

Funny how you are silent on the one built for Ghadaffi by Lavalin.

Ask Eye how he feels about Lavalin and why he has not condemned Trudeau for supporting Lavalin building a concentration camp for Ghaddafi.. He tends to be selective in what he criticizes.

What he did to save Jews was righteous. The part of him that agreed with the Nazis would have been of course problematic. Are you trying to argue humans are not both evil and good? If you are it would be very stupid. With the exception of sociopaths including Hitler and Stalin you will find all humans have equal propensity to be negative or positive and each one of us must struggle to decide which one we will be at any given time. I think we are equal parts evil and good and where one begins and the other ends is absurd. It doesn't matter-they both exist and clash and this is the pith and substance of all energy let alone life-the struggle of the extremes clashing and a constant need to harmonize the two. It basic physics. Even sociopaths unintentionally can do good. I have sat in a room with a man who molested many children. In that sense he was evil personified. That same man gave lots of money to charities. The latter action enabled him access to children but also assisted those in need. His actions may not have been intended for good and may have been evil in motive but they did some good. I have been at a place in my life where I could easily kill humans I felt zero emotion for because of what they did. I thank God I had the sense to know to pull back. How about you? Trust me that place of nothingness, is a dead calm-things are crystal clear and there is no colour, just intense black and white with no sound, smell, feeling-just a slight twitch of the finger on a trigger would do it. No sweat, no heavy breathing, no rise in pulse. You don't want to be there. Its why I have deference to soldiers who never went there. They may suffer ptsd but they did not go there. Their guilt and regret means they still are alive and are not in hell. Hell is not a fire, its absolutely nothing. Its an absolute point of pointlessness. Its where extremists want to push you along with them but neither of you really knows it or would want to go there if you have any sense of sanity. You asked. I answered. Body parts on a street make you think about such things. Satan is nothing more than a personification of a human with no limits or sense of anything but him/herself. If you can't feel the sanctity of life in each person, and get to the point you can just shoot them with no feeling, that is the Satan inside you. We all have one. Don't kid yourself. I walk in a Mosque no different than a synagogue, church, temple, shrine, cemetery, death site, etc., with deference. I make no apology for that. I make no apology for feeling sanctity in people and their places no matter how evil they themselves may be. Sometimes its hard, sometimes its not but I will be damned if a Satanist lowers me to their standard. Don't become what you hate in others. We all get tricked into going that route because of anger and other negative emotions. Don't ask me too. I won't. I can clean up body parts without puking, but I won't go there. Its too easy to blow things up the challenge is not allowing feelings when you put the things in bags. That is why I respect vultures.

No not in Canada. I do think Trudeau however exploited a hate crime against Muslims for political pandering purposes absolutely no different then he exploited Syrian refugees for photos when they came to Canada or after a fire, and I believe he exploits ethnics and panders to them constantly to try get a vote. I find his tears phony, his entire attack patronizing and phony and say unequivocally he is a bigot of the worst kind for doing that.

No one is Islamophobic for pointing out what they do not like in the Islamic religion. That is not the issue. The only issue is if anyone of any group is unfairly characterized as having the same identical stupid or terrorist or negative thoughts simply because they are in the same group. My issue is not people pointing out what they find problematic with a religion's ideology, but I will challenge them if it is said in a way that suggests all people who follow that religion think the same way. I get many people arguing mainstream Islamic ideology as practiced is still quite problematic for them and clashes with democratic values, it most certainly does. I share those criticisms. I just argue until doomsday to myself as well as everyone else we all have to stop assuming everyone thinks the same way about their or anyone else's religion. I have to argue that because where I sit, there is zero difference between a Taxme and a Saudi, zero. I also believe Argus or Dog are not stereotyping every Muslim but it could be taken that way and fuel extremists to justify their saying everyone hates Muslims. Extremists want us to talk in extreme or over-generalized terms to justify their doing the same and then arguing, you do it, so can I. Look at how this discussion comes about in an attempt to label all supposed "right wingers" no differently than people try label all "Muslims" when someone who is Muslim engages in terror. Bottom line is a jack ass is a jack ass. Call him or her what you want they are a jack ass and I can't stand them all for the same reasons their need to be violent and their belief they can be violent because they feel superior to others. Far as I am concerned we'z all just primates barely out of the trees wackin each other over the head with rocks and chattering away like baboons fighting over baboonettes to mate with. Its all bullshit. Right wingers are as varied in beliefs as left wingers as are Mulsims as are Jews as are Christians as are people with male or female genitilia. Their aint nothin fluid about that.

The US and every other country on this planet have societies that engage in vengeance or revenge. It is not specific to Muslim societies its specific to homo sapiens as a species that kills based on anger. I am not sure how we talk about humans as being vengeful by suggesting its more common with some then others. Is it? Is it all about Muslim religion creating this behaviour? The person who initiated the attack was not Muslim and he stated what he did was in revenge for what Muslims have done. Has everyone missed that? Why on a thread that tries to blame right wingers for this idiot we now engage in sophistry about Muslim ideology? Does anyone here really believe Christians turn the other cheek and for phack's sake my religion says fight back in direct ratio to what is needed to defend but no more then that but is it always followed? All of us have acted in vengeance and for that matter what religion is rational? I am not defending any Muslim extremist but I won't engage in references that generalize it as being specific to Muslims only. That is the point and no not all Muslims practice the religion in a violent way and it serves as an injustice to say Ahmadi Muslims who have been the victim of violent Muslims to lump them in with them. Ahmadi Muslims do not practice or engage in violence and they are as Muslim as anyone. I talk this way because in the aftermath of an attack some of you want to blame it on right-wingers and others on Muslims. That misses the point of what happened for phacks sake people died, innocent people. Why can we not just leave it at that and remember the dead? Why do we use their bodies to carry on with these rationalizations of why we do not like or hate or blame others for violent humans?

Bullshit. Imagining how it feels I woul sugest simply you projecting your feelings of inadequacy, guilt and perverted thought processes on others. You of course use a script from Michael Jackson. Now that makes perfect sense.

Your rantings at this point reveal the exact same reasoning process the idiot in NZ used and most extremists use-ridiculous, illogical stereotyping that projects the stereotypers own feelings of self hatred and inadequacy on others in an attempt to rid themselves of their feelings of inadequacy. Your writings show nothing but arrested emotional and intellectual development and stunted and fragmented thoughts that make no sense. You troll with your comments at this point.

Your comment suggesting all Muslims put a high premium on vengeance is an idiotic stereotype and no different than the bigoted generalizations you accuse "Westerners" or "rightwingers" of making about Muslims. It also is part of a larger idiotic misconception you continue to advance that Muslim terrorism is caused by the West and if the West ignores Muslims presto suddenly they are all non violent. Its past idiotic but its par for the course with your contributions on this forum, simplistic, juvenile and without any logical basis. Using your logic the fool who shot the people in NZ is a victim of the West as well and had he been left alone would have simply played with is boom-a-rang.

Here we go again other a juvenile poorly written response. You make a negative comment slurring all Muslims. Then you make an Coptic statement that concludes people who are Muslim terrorists behave that way because the West victimized them which is absolute stupidity as most have never been in contact other he West or engage in violence. Then using your idiot reasoning we should assume the idiot who killed people in NZ is a victim of the West? I would suggest you give some thought before you respond and stop p!aging yourself as a victim. Your writings on the forum can't get any more stupid than what you wrote above.

Muslim terrorists rejoice when some idiot kills Muslims in mosques just as they do Christians and Jews getting shot. It causes Muslims to be afraid of non Muslims making them easier to recruit intonthe extreme Muslim groups and I saw this first hand in Israel with both Israelis and Palestinians depending on who was attacked. Mainstream Islamic ideology in many countries is at times in direct conflict with Western democratic values yes. All that said what happened was disgusting. To shoot at unarmed people let alone ones praying it is low as it gets.

Actually fear of foreigners taking jobs away from people born in the country is the no.1 negatives stereotypevof f immigrants. However that said that soon wears off and friction comes from other things as well. I don't disagree I just think there two are linked.

Who is they?

Scrib no one needs to agree with any or all of Islam to know shooting unarmed people in a mosque is wrong.

You would know of course.