Rue

You are well aware that combatting terrorism is not something any sane person let alone Israelis who have to live with its daily attacks would find fun as you have suggested. You knew the title of your thread and your words smeering all Israelis would incite the usual piss on Israel/Israelis comments., so your continued posing and whining as a misunderstood victim is pitiful. Next time you piss check the wind direction. .

You ask questions on situations you have no clue about but pose as if you understand.. As such you are not worthy of a response. "the boy squirts his pimples in the mirror so can not see the reflection coming back.." Rue 3333333.33333333

I am going to be very clear. The title of your thread shows clearly you tried to take an issue with a private company or companies and smeer all Israeli citizens with it. Your dishonest cut and paste is there for all to see. Your use of the holocaust in your words is there for all to see. You chose to take an incident and activities a private enterprise engages in not just to insult and smeer all Israelis but holocaust survivors and by inherent inference any Jew who chose to become Israeli or believes they have the right to defend their right to be a political collective identity. At the pith and substance of your attack is your repeat theme that Jews who defend themselves from terrorism are necessarily bloodthirsty. The blood thirsty libel started with the accusation of Jews having the blood of Christ on our hands. Shylock represented the bloodthirsty in approach to moral values. Now you recycle this crap using the fact Jews are Israelis to try justify smeering them all as bloodthirsty. Your posing as an innocent victim shows your character. Your whining to Hot Enough who personally attacks and insults everyone he disagrees with is a joke. You can't handle being called out on a thoroughly hateful hatchet job and a half assed one where you did not think anyone would actually read what you deliberately parsed and removed from its actual context. Your continual denial of what you did and your continued whining speaks for itself. So does the title of the thread and now your whining and your petulant responses If you truly found the business these enterprises engage in questionable you could have easily said so. You chose instead to incite hatred with the title knowing it would attract piss on Israel for existing responses and on cue it sure as hell attracted the flies. You Sir raised the pathetic canard that all Israelis especially those who survive the holocaust are bloodthirsty. Get it clear whiner, victim poser, you want to start hateful threads- have the balls to back them up and not whine like a spineless jellyfish when you get called out. You want to accuse me or any Jew or any Israeli of being bloodthirsty becaue we defend ourselves from terrorists and people like uou- you know where to find me and whether you hide behind the hood or a pen name or show your face it makes no difference to me-the stink of the words you spew is the same and so is my fist.

When Laurel and Hardy tell me Bashir Assad is a victim of Canadian molestation I have one thing to say to the "two" -GENIUSES.

You can't finish the crap you start. You can come on this forum and make accusations with no proof but you can't back them up and neither can your "namesake" . Now if you want me to pretend you two are different fine. The point remains whatever name you use, you make allegations with ZERO to back it up and you find it important to make accusations but not back them up. Maybe you need to understand before you make unfounded bulsheeyat accusations you back up what you say or run and hide like you do now but either way your excuse is a joke.

The same amount you have. What now you want to pretend you paid Kadr. Do you ever give your moral righteousness a rest? You sit on a toilet seat not a throne Saint Omni.

No unlike you he is clear in what he says. Right now you want to pretend and fabricate we acted constitutionally or as you erroneously state, illegally, with our natives. Even your prancing Prime Minister says otherwise and shed a tear over it which required he dab his eyes with a handkerchief for photo-ops..

No it was unconstitutional. There is a legal difference. Illegal refers to acts of an individual, unconstitutional when its acts of a government official. You are free to misrepresent the law and be petulant about it.

No need, your incoherent, illogical and nonsensical comments speak for themselves No American or Canadian retaliated against Kadr othewise he'd be dead. He's not only alive and well but laughing at you and what you stand for.

No legal expert it was unconstitutional." Illegal" is properly used to refer to a criminal, provincial offences or regulatory violation by an individual not by a government. The only reason I bother at this point is to show you haven't a clue about what you try pose as a lecturer on, As I stated you are ignorant of the law and pose as if you understand it. You clearly don't. "source: https://warrentrogers.wordpress.com/previous-stands-2010/immoral-unconstitutional-and-illegal/" Immoral, Unconstitutional and Illegal Today, many Americans suppose that immoral, unconstitutional, and illegal are interchangeable terms, but each has a distinct and very important meaning. 1. Immoral means incompatible with moral principles. 2. Unconstitutional means incompatible with a constitution. 3. Illegal means incompatible with the law of the land. Moral principles are eternal, universal and objective. Eternal means that they are the same past, present and future. Universal means they are the same both here and everywhere else. Objective means that they are true regardless of whether a person or group embraces or rejects them. Moral principles determine what is just or unjust. Moral principles determine what is good or evil. Many people have vague or mistaken notions about what a constitution is. Some assume that whatever is established as tradition is the constitution. Others assume that morality is the constitution. Still others imagine that court opinions are the constitution. All these notions are wrong. A constitution is a document that formally states the powers that the people have consented to grant to their government. The people show their consent when they ratify or approve their constitution. Thus a constitution is not eternal truth, nor is it the will of God. It is the will of the people. A constitution governs government. A constitution determines a government’s powers and structure. A constitution is a written, ratified document and it can be changed only by another written, ratified document, a constitutional amendment. What is the difference between saying that something is immoral and saying that it is unconstitutional? One key difference is that constitutions can be changed by amendments, but morality cannot be changed by any vote of any group. In order to know what is constitutional, one must study the constitution, whereas one can learn of morality by consulting the scriptures, his conscience, moral philosophers etc. The government uses its power to make and enforce law. The law of the land is a standard of conduct enforced by earthly government. Government enforces laws by punishing law breakers. Morality is eternal, universal, and objective. On the other hand, laws differ from country to country so they are not universal. A law goes into effect only after it is passed and can be repealed by the legislature that originally passed it. Therefore, the law of the land is not eternal. What is the difference between saying that something is illegal and saying that it is unconstitutional? The constitution governs government, but law governs persons. When government or a branch of government exercises a power that the constitution does not allow, the exercise is unconstitutional rather than illegal. For the sake of brevity, I explain here only one of the reasons why it is important to differentiate between the concepts of morality and constitutionality. Remember, I said in my speech on my oath of office that in order for a limit on government to be effective, very many people must push back all at once when a government official steps beyond the limit and that very many people can push back all at once only if they all agree on what the limit should be. I further explained that a constitution provides that previously agreed standard. If we suppose that morality and constitutionality are the same concept then any different opinions that the people have among themselves regarding moral principles such as the proper role of government would cause different people to push back at different points rather than all at once. Government is so mighty that it will surely overcome people that oppose it a few at a time. Differences in beliefs about what is just or unjust can arise from many causes, such as differences in religious beliefs, culture of origin (for immigrants etc.). Fortunately, regardless of our different opinions about what is morally right, we all do have one federal constitution and one state constitution in common. Remember, if we tell citizens to consult Holy Scripture to determine what is morally right, Christian and Muslim citizens will not turn to the same book. Because they are consulting different books, they can get different answers to the question, “what is morally right?” On the other hand, there is only one U.S. Constitution that all U.S. citizens share and there is only one Utah State Constitution that all Utahns share.

Well good to see you and Eye now admit to being one and the same. Well put. Bashir Assad is a victim of Canadian molestation. Brilliant. All this time I thought his father named him Bashir because of his tendency to smash the heads in of political opponents.

Terrorists only terrorize bad people. That's been the sum of your babblings in many threads. You repeat a fallacy that believes bad things only happen to bad people and if you are good (i.e., don't annoy terrorists), nothing bad will happen. Its a childhood fiction children learn when they are old enough to understand they are being punished for being bad. The point really is children learn they are punished when they are good as well and so they find punishment unfair. I can only suppose people like you never move past the feeling that you were punished when you were good and fixate on this being unfair and so try repeat the mantra only bad people are punished. Its a ridiculous postulation to promote any fallacy that bad things only happen to bad people or terrorists only attack people that provoke terrorists. That reasoning is maladaptive. The person punished learns to blame themselves for being punished and not independently arrive at a conclusion as whether what they did was right or wrong. Their lesson is distorted and becomes a reaction to pain or perceived on-coming pain and avoding it, not reasoning out what is right and wrong. Now when dealing with a child, when it comes to immediate danger issues such as placing a hand on a hot stove, a slap on the butt is more effective. However we can see a generation brought up like you that does not question right and wrong-it simply fears any kind of adversary and struggle or confrontation and thinks if they smile and act nice, nothing bad happens. That passive aggressive behaviour with the smile on the face has an angry soul bubbling underneath resenting those that cause it fear and never being able to express that fear. The whole exercise of Kadr being paid off is an excellent example of how today's generation pays off to avoid uncomfortable confrontations The Prime Minister is a symbol of the feel good superficial photo op posing and smile of a shallow generation that doesn't have more than 10 seconds on its cell phone to grasp any issue and needs an instant pleasure reinforced. We often hear atheists say, there is no God because if God existed bad things would not happen let alone bad things to god people. Today's variation of that is terrorists (people who follow no laws, ie., Satan) molest us because God is silent (what is right is defeated easily by what is wrong). Terrorists are nothing more than humans, homo sapiens, apes, reverting to basic primal behaviour where in the absence of a strong Alpha male ape to keep the pack in line, young horny apes fight for prospective mates. Now and then an Alpha male emerges making the tell tale sounds of the loud Alpha male growl (law and order speeches and pledges to bring back law and order) but Alpha male politicians in today's age are few and far between. Most are temporary and emerge for brief periods of ruling their packs before another devours them. Also as does happen in ape packs, the elder females in fact run things domestically anyways because the males after fighting each other, have no energy to do anything else. All that said, this continuing idiotic notion, this naïve childish belief that bad things go away if you are good as Eye states is the producy of frightened chidren adults. That is to say adults who have never had to deal with adversarial confrontations in their sheltered entitled worlds, and certainly don't want to have to fight for what they have-they have never been taught the price or value of what they have, its just an abstract given they expect not realizing the price their parents paid to get it although certainly feeling resentful if ever told what that price was or is. Terrorists don't and have never attacked only those that bother them. This fiction they only attack the West because the West attacked them I s the product of a generation of children brought up without having to critically analyze. They simply regurgitate the site on the intenet that suits their mood. When dealing with trauma victims, war vets with ptsd who come back from war with unresolved emotional issues, therapists and fellow soldiers in group support will tell such people. don't focus on the past, look to the future because the past can not be undone, but the future is yet to be made. We do that in mediation to move people past conflict to new agreements/ In Judaism the story of Moses coming down the mountain with the two commandments was about the fact he could carry a heavy burden of responsibility as long as he felt hope but when he saw people dancing around a gold calf and he lost hope, he hurled the burden of the two heavy tablets down because that weight of responsibility now seemed overbearing. In the politics of terrorism what people who have lived with it have learned and soldiers have learned who overcome and struggle with their post war pain, is that we can't avoid bad. We can't avoid evil. Its never going away. Its as inevitable as life itself. So we have choices. We were given the choice of independent thought which means, we can be like Eye and cower and pretend if we are nice evil goes way-or we can look the evil in the face and say-NOW WHAT- what do GOOD people do to prevent BAD people from terrorizing them Soldiers become overwhelmed with grief and guilt over questioning whether what they did was the right thing. Victims of trauma question themselves and often blame themselves for bringing the bad upon themselves. So we say to such people-no its not what happened-its not what you did, its what we CAN DO now and in the future to see to it bad things don't happen. That is why we are born with the gift of free choice. Terrorists attack the innocent. They look for weakness. The first people they come for are the Eyes in society-the soft underbelly of privileged, fearful, entitled, narcissistic children. Its why hyenas pick off the weak in a pack not the strongest. A lack of moral values in our Western society caused by over-reliance on defining value by how much material we acquire has fueled a spiritual malaise that makes it very easy for totalitarian packs of terrorist hyenas to look to soft, fat kittens and puppies to feast on. Our over reliance on material comfort has created a softness that those in non material societies sense and are hungry to devour. Terrorism is not about defending-its about attacking. Its just a variation of Barbarians or Vikings or Huns. The name of the "God" changes but the violence, the pillaging, the rape, the brutal imposition of force remains the same. Terrorism is just the latest reincarnated version of uncivilized humans reverting to primal behaviour. Its not based on logic, common sense, cause and effect. Its based on feelings of the moment-humans acting out urges for instant gratification. It is the antithesis of civility (repressing certain feelings) and spirituality (feeling life is precious. In my life I have travelled from the world of terrorists to the shopping malls of the Eyes and Hot Enoughies. The only thing keeping these soft children from being eaten is the very soldiers and system they spit on.

Its not psychiatry, if anything it would be psychoanalysis. Then again given your knowledge of steel, why would one expect your knowledge of psychology let alone psychiatry be any different. By the way the first two words, illustrate someone who fears authority and was brought up an environment where he was not allowed to express his true feelings. You now have exchanged the fundamentalist religious upbringing you had with Marxism. See its not that hard. Psychological profiling is done my marketers, political analysts, con-men, police,. Profiling is a fundamental exercise in business intelligence and risk management. It helps us understand why some people are obsessed with "failed lawyers" and why people use that phrase as a substitute for "father".

I asked you to list the Muslim countries "we've helped molest". You wouldn't answer the question. You responded asking me what "we" meant. Why would you ask me to define how you use "we"? Next you asked me to list the countries "we" have alliances with in the Middle East to evade providing the above list. As usual you show you are full of crap and make sweeping pronouncements you have no idea how to back up. Either provide the names of the countries you claim we molested, explain how you determined we molested them and how you determined these molestations werre worth hundreds of millions of dollars or continue to show you spew without substance and make things up to make noise to get attention. I have yet to see you be able to quote any reference from anywhere. Your sole contribution on this forum is to make emotive, subjective, unsubstantiated moral judgements you can't back up your allegations with any basis because you place no thought in what you spew. Go clean your keyboard.

I could offer analysis as to why you felt guilty but it sounds like you would not find it helpful. Let's just keep it simple then-its not helpful for you to feel guilty.

You get one final response from me on this thread because I have the responsibility to do it once based on the Jewish code of ethics that says silence to a lie condones the lie: In regards to your map exercise: http://www.thetower.org/article/the-mendacious-maps-of-palestinian-loss/ The thread started as a pretense to criticize terrorist tourism is entitled ISRAEL HAS FUN WITH TERRORISM. The thread producer uses a private enterprise to smeer the entire nation as blood thirsty. You parrot along. You've never been to Israel. You produce idiotic maps you don't understand. You never met an Israeli soldier or a Palestinian. Your entire reality is based on reading the internet in Mama's basement and you want to lecture me as to what the IDF has to say? You? Its time you stop posing son. Your posts are ridiculous. Don't claim you understand any soldier let alone Israeli ones.

Thank you for that. Just for that I will avoid more responses. I appreciate that comment. Coming from some someone who has taken more then his share of blasts from me it means a lot.

I don't have to prove anything. Your continued words say it all. Nothing you do or say makes me a victim and I never claimed I was one-you are playing that role trying to defend what you did and the continued swearing and name calling revealing your true sentiments.. In fact people with the words and tactics you engage in don't victimize anyone let alone a Jew. If anything they empower us and others to understand just how weak you are. Kiss off to the Neo Nazi or Go Fly A Kike by Rue (also known as Rue 23234) "the Irishman taught me now to fight the native how to respect the river the Frenchman how to skate the Italian how to cook the Jamaican how to sing the Latino how to dance the Catholic girl how to kiss the Newfoundlander how to laugh the Englishman how to march and get sun burned the gays how to cry the women not to swear and the Jews to NEVER FORGET." " you think he'd learn-each time he tries to shoot, another stand up comedian is born" Rye 1499995

Oh boys the attempt to cue and bait to seek piss on Israel responses-done and then some. Run along.

You've never been to Israel. Your combined knowledge of Israel, the West Bank, Gaza, Muslims, Jews, Middle East terrrorism, comes from reading web-sites. Run along. You are someone who calls a melting spot on steel a type of steel and who poses as a scientist, engineer, expert on chemistry and now expert on the Middle East. To me you have zero knowledge of anything other than the web-sites you parse-run along. I prefer talking with the boys from Tehran.

From the question above it could be speculated you are: 1-deliberately ignorant of the answer; and/or 2-have a learning disability you need help with; and/or 3-engage in trying to cue more neo Nazi comments on Jews on this thread.

Now that you deny you go to neo Nazi sites...please provide the names of your conservative sites.

ou get exposed falsely cutting and mixing quotes to then smeer all Israelis and portray Jews and Israelis as blood thirsty and you ask what gives and pose as some innocent victim? The act has worn thin and your attempts to play victim are pathological in pattern. Moderation? You want to lecture people about moderation when your purpose was to come on this thread to incite hatred of an entire people. Sure. Run along. You whine.

You engaged in a smeer job and were exposed. Posing as a victim is a joke. You are no victim, just someone using this board to engage in a smeer on all Israelis and Jews.

This coming from someone who supports Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, Intifada, PFLP, Iran anyone and everyone who believes in the violent overthrow of Israel and you want to suggest to me I support terrorism? You think pulling some crap propaganda tapes that select what they want to see makes your point. You think cut and pastes designed to incite anger makes your point? Tell me how is it that every Western nation uses police dogs to take down suspects, but only when Israel does it, its terrorism? You think I take your selective crap seriously? Save it. By the way when you want to talk about how police dogs are used and how they save lives and are an alternative to more lethal force let me know. Of course you don't want to discuss that any more than you do the terrorism certain Palestinians promote. In your world you can smeer an entire nation of Israelis while in the next breath accusing me of the same about Palestinians when I have to date ever used a phrase blaming all Palestinians for the conflict in the Middle East as you do for all Israelis. Spare me your propoganda crap.