Jump to content

gc1765

Member
  • Posts

    2,625
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by gc1765

  1. I didn't even know Mark Holland was in the moving business
  2. I'm getting dizzy from these circular arguments. Where is it addressed explicitly?
  3. Still illegal. If I find an unmarked envelope in my own house, I'm not allowed to open it???
  4. So you don't actually know, and you're just guessing? If you find the letter in your house, over a year after you moved in, then yes of course it's ok.
  5. How do you know this? No need to get testy...
  6. Haven't you read any of my posts in this thread?
  7. The Conservative party was moving out of the opposition leader's office in March 2007? If the boxes were found on the day the Liberals moved in, you might have a point. But over a year later, and those boxes could be anyone's. Don't you think the Liberals might move boxes around once in a while?
  8. Oh, well as long as you believe that Holland must have known what 320-3 meant, I can rest assured. I mean, who doesn't know what 320-3 means? Duh.
  9. Link This is good news, no matter how you spin it.
  10. I will repeat what I have said over and over in this thread: Show me where there is a clear indication of who owns the boxes (and no, 320-3 is not a clear indication. If you found a wallet marked 320-3, would you know what to do with it). I keep asking, but so far no one has been able to show me. I'm starting to think people are ignoring this point on purpose. If you can show me this, I will agree with you 100%. If not, I will continue to assume there is no indication of who owns the boxes.
  11. We've seen what the Liberals have done in power, and we have seen how they spent 14% less than what the Conservatives are currently spending. Unless of course you would rather base your opinions on pure speculation, rather than what the Liberals have done in their 13 years of power.
  12. Ummm that means the Liberals spent 14% less than what the Conservatives are currently spending. So why are you implying that the Liberals spend more?
  13. To be fair, he hasn't flip-flopped yet
  14. :lol: :lol:
  15. That would just encourage them further. See my signature.
  16. Bombing their country is not exactly going to encourage people to want a pro-western government.
  17. If you have any evidence to condemn Martin for the sponsorship scandal, I'd love to hear it. As for stockwell, all this talk of it being a done deal doesn't fly. When the RCMP was investigating this previously, they concluded that Hart's resignation was not contingent upon compensation. Recent evidence, which Hart does not deny, shows that his resignation was in fact contingent upon compensation. An analogy would be if someone found documents quoting Martin saying "yep, I am responsible for stealing money in the sponsorship scandal" and Martin coming out and saying "yep, what I said previously is true". If that's the case, wouldn't you want to see Martin prosecuted? Or would you say that it has already been settled?
  18. It's illegal to offer inducement for someone to step down. It may be a non-issue for you, but it's still illegal.
  19. I've quoted it 2 or 3 times in this thread. Look for yourself.
  20. Exactly how should "My resignation was contingent upon this negotiation" be spun in order to make the CPC look good?
  21. Seems everyone keeps ignoring my posts when I bring up the fact that Jim Hart does not deny it. Here is the Link ...not that I'm actually expecting a response...
  22. I posted part of it at least a couple of times in this thread, and also stated that Jim Hart doesn't deny it. How come everyone keeps ignoring that? Basically, the documents said something like "my resignation was contingent upon payment" or something to that effect, but I'm too lazy to look it up yet again and Jim Hart does not denying saying that.
  23. Everyone keeps saying it's clearly marked with the address. I'll I see are the numbers 320-3 (rather discreetly on the side of one of the boxes). Do you have another video which shows the address clearly marked? Or is 320-3 your definition of a clearly marked address? If it had said "Property of the CPC, deliver to the office of the Prime Minister" I would agree with you 100%, but so far all I have seen is 320-3.
×
×
  • Create New...