BubberMiley

Forums sure are boring when everyone agrees with one another.

I don't think you'll hear Thomas Sophonow or David Milgaard calling for a return of the death penalty.

Hasn't the blood in sussex only been there for two years?

Well, Harper's neither amiable nor a dunce. And the contempt for humanity thing is only based on my own stoner vibes, and what's more reliable than strong stoner vibes?

I'd say when you can't adjust your convictions, you become brain dead. Stronach said "I didn't get involved in putting the two parties together so we could break up the country." Destroying the central government and replacing it with regional fiefdoms with firewalls around them could be considered a hidden agenda, considering they certainly aren't mentioning it during the campaign.

Contempt for humanity? Maybe he just has contempt for idiots. Though I can understand how there'd be little difference for you. Yes, Argus, I am a total idiot, but I'm not stupid enough to fall for the weed is "way more dangerous today because it's so much stronger than the stuff hippies used to smoke" argument.

So you must be mad as hell at Harper for indicating he would be willing to include Quebec at the table in international relations.

Yeah, and that election wasn't really interesting till it was over.

The sun'll come out...tomorrow.

Don't you think that by voting conservative, you're stealing federalist anti-lib votes from the Bloq and benefiting the Liberals? Have you considered voting strategically? I'm an NDPer, and we do it all the time.

That's true. Not a big priority. And Anne McClellan wasn't exactly keen on the idea (but she's from AB).

Then again, you never know. Bill Clinton managed eight years (though perhaps he was more extremely willing than perverted--then again, that cigar was freaky).

But talk about ban-crazy, the CPC is the only party advocating criminalization of possessing small amounts of weed.

That's true. Some weasel Liberal would get you to reveal your identity and out you as the despicable perverted argus. Harper would make you resign within three hours.

I certainly don't hate Harper (don't even know him). But I do think he's moderating his image and suppressing his personal political opinions in order to get elected. But that's just politics, not cause for hatred. But as for him, I'm not convinced he has anything but contempt for humanity in general.

I've been to conservative.ca. That dude has scary eyes, man.

I'm not a liberal, but I am a drug addict.

Canada has higher greenhouse gas emissions because we have to heat our homes and businesses from this gawd-awful cold. That sucks up a lot of energy, even more than the air conditioners in Arizona.

So based on that, you actually believe the republicans are standing up for the environment?

You must not have spent much time here recently. If I were a Liberal, my feelings would have been very hurt by now.

I would consider SSM to be an issue of personal responsibility (as marriage is a responsible commitment) and allowing it a sign of respect for others. In fact, I would say it strengthens family values, because it supports commitment in relationships, which is what families are based on. And I don't see how getting tough on crime (which I personally fully support) does anything to strengthen the family.

Dubious unsourced stats, and an apparent lack of understand of the definition of neocon.

If the NDP is a communist party, does that make MB and SK communist republics?

I don't think family values have gone away, but how would a government propose to bring them back if they had?

Because neocons always stand up for the environment. Just ask the caribou in the arctic wildlife refuge.