Leafless

Claiming you are an investor is not in the same category as a casual investor. But that's okay as we are accustomed to your imaginary self-importance. You claimed it, find it yourself. Threatening to be called an idiot by an adult with the mentality of a child means little but only induces one to express genuine pity towards one, such as yourself, inflicted with this serious mental disorder. Poor Dancer.

Seven potential buyers have shown interest in the Hull-Chelsea-Wakefield Steam Train after it stopped operations indefinitely in May because of a dispute between the owner and the municipalities that own the line on which it runs. André Groulx, who has operated the train for his father-in-law, Jean Gauthier, for 15 years, said yesterday the train is advertised for $2.5 million on www.ozarkmountainrailcars.com, based in Missouri. http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/c...b8-1e77b21a3ff4 Not a word about how and why this train was originally acquired. The Wakefield train used to belong and operate out of Ottawa Ontario from the Science and Technology Museum. But it ran a deficit partly because of vandalism on the Quebec side where they regularly greased the tracks on a hill around Chelsea Quebec causing the train to slip backwards and needless to say ruining the excursion. But a Quebec entrepreneur convinced officials he could make it work and the train was sold. Amazingly there was no longer problems with vandalism which was now a Quebec buisness. Now it is being resold for $2.5 million. Does anyone remember what price this train was acquired for?

Hey, not bad for a Black guy.

Don't worry googler Dancer, we know all about your little tricks. So which is it Dancer? The other day you were an investor. A while back it was all about the the gang at the office. Further back it was the family buisness in Montreal. So what are you to-day?

Oh I know him, from some obscure Montreal web site where he spewed the identical type U.S. propaganda, day after day, after day, after day, before they shut down.

You are viewing that from the wrong perspective, as it is the principle that matters. This has nothing to do with speeding but what should be your constitutional right. Regardless there are other jammers available at a more reasonable price.

This is understandable being an obsequious parasitical person like yourself.

Your experience as master googler could leave you looking 'not to smart' without the benefit of your computer. Virtual intelligence means nothing.

Environmental issues are already in the hands of federal government and if you are unhappy with that is to bad. A Provincial assault on the federal government is NOT in the best interest of Canadians. Maybe we should have a referendum on this issue rather than have Mc.Guinty selling the interest of Ontarians to Quebec. That might be your opinion but it is not mine. In fact I don't want the premier of Ontario dealing with a separatist province, hung up on culture period. Furthermore Mc.Guinty is not only dealing on enviromental issues with Quebec but also a Quebec city to Windsor Ontario high speed rail system (which will guarantee more fracophones stealing jobs in Ontario under the guise of official bilingualism). Also Mc.Guinty is dealing on a 1,250 megawatt link to Quebec's generating grid rather than produce the power here in Ontario where it should be produced. Michael, wake up and realize what is happening here. http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/s...b6-3609e771f663

That false statement (topic is nuclear weapons 'by what you know about them' is not the intended topic) and claim was intended as a personal attack and insult by DogOnPorch: Maybe DogOnPorch can then elaborate what he exactly meant (which he did not) initially, when he stated B.C. "actually worked with nuclear weapons". What does this rather senseless statement exactly mean: 1. - B.C. has preliminary understanding of nuclear weapons and I don't? 2.- B.C. has a superior knowledge of nuclear weapons equivalent to that of any nuclear scientist and I don't? Obviously, I can interpret and reply any way I choose when confronted with this type of nonsensical insulting reply.

I fail to understand how the premier of the largest majority English speaking province in the country can take the side of a minority French nationalistic separatist province over the leadership of the federal government of Canada relating to environmental issues.

How about a biased premier, bent on culture, running the province.

It is interesting to note, up to now, no member sees this action as an aggressive, unwarranted attack on the leadership of the Harper Conservative government.

This was after the fact not before. What would you want the Japanese to think or for that matter even the U.S. who never experienced first hand the destructive power on an actual city. I have seen articles suggesting this was one of the reasons the U.S dropped the bomb was to actually experience as part of its on going experiments the bombs actual destructive power. Before is what I am talking about and the Japanese were not warned of the bombs destructive power via military films.

There is protection against laser guns that record your speed in .25 secs. There is the Passport Escort, model 9500ci that detects both radar and laser and as an added bonus jams laser. This jamming is illegal also and can result in an possible obstruction charge if you are caught. But on the bright side the officer could think he has a defective reading and forget about it. BTW - Maybe you are aware of this but laser can be rigged. http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&am...90734772L321514

What legal authority do you posses to determine that another citizen has broken a law? According to the books it is a criminal offense to murder. But no crime has been committed until a suspect is charged and proven guilty of breaking that written offense. It means you don't have a clue, that picking ANY KIND of a transmitted frequency out of public air space should not be considered a crime, unless you believe Canada is a communist regime.

Maybe you can provide a link where Japan was shown films of the A-bomb and its destructive powers. Other than that B.C.'s own link: Scientific Panel, Which includes: An alternative to this rather than worry about saving American lives would have been for the U.S. to pack up and just go home. But no, they would rather demonstrate, first hand and speaking of fanatics, IOW- prepare for some SHOCK and AWE.

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/s...b1-e272d3d87466 So, Ontario bilingually raised Premier Dalton Mc.Guinty has joined forces with Quebec Premier John Charest relating to a European inspired /Quebec plan to reduce greenhouse emissions. It is easy to understand how subsidized 'in everything' Quebec can dream up such a scheme but not so easy to understand Mc.Guinty agreeing to such a hair brained scheme when manufacturing in Ontario is in the dumpsters. He must obviously think anything to come out of Quebec is great. This should be a wake up call to the feds and how it subsidizes Quebec to bring them in line to the realities of the 'real world fears' relating to harmful greenhouse incentives that could or will cause economic hardship in Canada.

Why brush up on World War ll, IT WAS ALREADY WON. LOL, now B.C. is a nuclear scientist and has the expertize to manufacture nuclear bombs. The topic is what Carter said about Israel and their nuclear weapons and not you glorifying your American friend B.C. who contributes NO MORE to society than any other tax paying citizen which allows governments to procure aggressive initiatives that basically serves the rich of capitalistic societies and exploits the rest of us to their desires. BTW- the MANY U.S. scientist who made 'Fat Man' a reality, were evenly split on whether or not to use the A-bomb on Japan and suggested first showing Japan military films of the bombs destructive power which in all likelihood would have convinced Japan to surrender. To bad that sane advice was rejected.

No radar detectors do not help drivers break the law. They help drivers avoid being CONVICTED of breaking the law. Therefore, if you are not convicted you are not legally proven breaking any law. If FTA chooses to employ personal opinion over legal consequence of breaking a law, that is his option. An opinion carries no legal weight, a conviction does. In the sense of how speed of a vehicle is computed with or without human intervention. I.E.- Speed detected, for instance, by a police aircraft involves an officer manually calculating your speed by physically actuating some sort of timing device vs. radar or laser that electronically, automatically via computer, computes your speed. Let us not over complicate matters.

Whatever makes you think that even if Quebec had won that referendum, that they would just be able to pack up and leave?

Only if it was daytime.

No harm done. One equates to the other.

Why? Currently, he is legally an 'enemy combatant' and not an 'unlawful enemy combatant'.

I think you mean 'enemy combatant'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_combatant