gatomontes99

No. She can respond as she sees fit. But when someone says Jesus is Lord and she says you don't belong here, that is a rejection. Is it not?

Another lie. The ice cream machine is always broken.

Were people kicked out of the McDonald's?

1) other than there wasn't a McDonald's near here when she claims to have worked there? Or that no one just does fries as she claims she did?

Meh...sounbites and snapshots. Trump won.

There is no lie. If you've seen the unedited video, post it.

You don't understand how there can be light without sun so that means it didn't happen? I did. You didn't want to hear them. First, law of conservation of mass states mass cannot be created or destroyed. The fact mass exists is proof that it was created. Which means a force, unexplainable to man, mad the universe. Aka God Second, Genesis 1 accurately outlines the creation of the universe and our planet and life on it. You choose to reject those arguments but you, of yet, have not provided any proof.

I don't understand why you guys lie when it is so easily debunked.

How about brisket, on top of mac and cheese on top of cornbread?

Really? So why do you keep arguing with my questions if the questions are not argumentative? You didn't prove me wrong, I have not brought those points up. Proving me wrong would be taking Genesis 1 and showing that the creation explanation was not in the correct order. Well, proving God's word is accurate will do that. We are in the middle of that. You lied. Genesis 1:3 is when light was created. Genesis 1:11 is when plants were created.

Didn't I do that with my last question? Argumentative questions are a thing. Well, you tried to move the goal posts. I was talking about creation. This will be more coherent if you don't try to jump around from one assumption to another. It would also be easier if you had supporting arguments to your thesis. For instance, I said Genesis accurately describes the general outline of how the universe and the planet were formed. Then I provided a short list of accurate predictions. You failed to even address my point. You, simply, made a generic statement with no supporting arguments. Generally, when people do that, they are unwilling to admit they can't discuss the topic intelligently. What you did is a defense mechanism. You tried to be forceful in an assertion to compensate for your lack of counter arguments. Bigotry by any other name is still bigotry. To put it in modern context, God identifies as He. Are you going to deny Him His identity?

Oh, but questions are arguments, aren't they? Read Genesis. It actually gives a broad account of how our world was created. It talks about the Earth coming into orbit with the sun and the moon coming into orbit with the Earth. It talks about one continent. It then talks about the first animals being in the sea. And so on. The accuracy of Genesis, when it comes to outlining the order of the Creation of the universe and our little blue ball would have been impossible for men of that time to know. BTW, the little bigoted digs like God is a she (when you know the Bible describes God as He) are childish. You are just doing it to be an a$$. You might think you are clever, but it is clear to all that read what you write, that you are full of hate. Maybe you should read the Bible and tell us what Jesus taught us that is wrong.

The laws of conservation. Specifically the conservation of mass: for any system closed to all transfers of matter and energy, the mass of the system must remain constant over time. If mass can not be created or destroyed, where did it come from? It had to have been created at some point.

I can't believe i didn't notice the pony and the girl pose. I think I've eaten to many salads on this diet. Lol. I'm off to order some BBQ.

I like how the source for the article is someone that wrote a book about how racist Christians are. What amazing journalism. /sarcasm

You can't name a reason. Shapiro would have delivered PA. He would have been a far better asset at delivering her message. But he is Jewish and there is a faction of the left that hates Jews. So she could not pick him. Tampon Tim has been a disaster. He is, by his own admission, a lying knucklehead. They are hiding him. He does not do TV any more.

Lmao...Trump shoes no signs of dementia.

I was going to write just about the exact same thing. Holly cow. They have no self awareness.

Not legal services as in a lawyer. Legal services as in services that are legal. More-on.

That's just your opinion. Libs just want to force other people to do it. We actually do it ourselves, without force majuere.

I agree that the ballot box is where you enact change. But where you garner support occurs in various places. Protesting at a clinic is a right. Blocking access to legal services is not. That said, that should be a ticket, maybe a couple of nights. Look at what happened to Columbia students that blocked access to legal services based on religious bigotry. Did they get 41 months in prison? They didn't even get suspended. The disproportionate use of the criminal code that seems to align with political affiliation is a serious problem. Hopefully we are in the final days of that ugly chapter of American history.

Oooh, sexy headline. But it is factual and this data is interesting. https://www.realclearpolling.com/maps/president/2024/no-toss-up/electoral-college Do you see the pattern? Against Joe Biden, Trump improved, on election day, by an average of 3% in these key states. The pollsters are calling these pocket voters. They are people they aren't able to poll because the pollster don't know they exist. They are usually first time voters. The big question is, can Trump drum up 3% in new voters again? That's hard to say. But he may not need to. If the polls are under reporting his voters, then he is in a great position to win. He leads in every swing state, so any improvement just seals his victory.

Wow. Such a hate-filled question. Would you actually accept any answer I gave? No. Not unless it comported to your bigoted beliefs. But, I shouldn't pass up an opportunity to share my testimony. I suppose the lazy and true answer of everything wouldn't satisfy anyone. The first, and most important aspect would be his message of love your neighbor as yourself. It is such a simple statement with such complex implications. If you love someone else as yourself than your treat their needs as your own. So you would absolutely prioritize their needs over your wants and literally feed them, cloth them, shelter them as you would yourself. But it is impossible to do that for everyone, so how do you draw the line? That is a tough answer, but I will say this, I am not perfect at it by any means. That leads me to the second message, we aren't perfect. We never will be. That is OK. We can and should ask for forgiveness. Forgiveness will be granted to is if we are truly repentant. That's another hard goal to reach. We all give in to sins and those sins do have a reward in this life. Wanting God's forgiveness over the reward of sin isn't easy. We can get there, though. That brings me to my last point, self-improvement. Self-improvement is an underlying theme that isn't explicity talked about often, but it is extremely important. We are all born broken and incomplete. We can fix our sins and do better in pursuit of the perfection Jesus showed us. We can never get there though. And we are not supposed to. Rather, we are supposed to strive for perfection, achieve some successes and, God willing, help others to improve along the way. That is my job in this life. I am promised that the struggles of today will be the glory of tomorrow. I do not know what that entails, exactly. All I know is that my life is important to those I am in contact with. I can either be a force for good or not. I'll do my best to be that force for good and when I fail, I'll seek forgiveness and do my best to improve. That is what appeals to me about Jesus and His word. Now, commence with your hate-filled retort.

Bullshit lie. Biden signs 3 executive orders reversing Trump on immigration