Fluffypants

Why wasn't Hilary even indicted for any of those, she literally every one of those things and lives in New York and used campaign funds to do it and got dinged by the FEC and was fined for it. Trump wasn't fined for it and they looked into it but the jury wasn't allowed to hear why it wasn't a campaign violation. None of what Trump did was illegal he paid his attorney for legal fees. What was the election interference? Burying a story? If that were the case every politician in Washington would be in jail. No tax tax crimes because he never deducted it. I would think you would have to be able prove the predicate crime and best they got was Cohen pleading guilty of campaign finance violations in his plea agreement which was inadmissible and the judge allowed it. Your just happy Trump got convicted and you don't see what can of worms this has opened up but you will. Because once Trump is elected you are going to be crying that Trump is Hitler because he is going after his political enemies. But according to you no one is above the law, right? So if Trump can get convictions than its perfectly valid.

They do that crap on purpose, they make the title of the article sound like someone did something then wayyyyyy down they tell you what really happened because most people will see the title and take it as truth.

Do you remember when we had 2 quarters of negative GDP and the same people argued that it wasn't a recession.

He literally convicted on intent not what he did. See they couldn't go after for him for just falsifying business records because statute of limitations had run out. He had to of intended to commit another crime and at no point did they explain exactly how what he did ran afoul of those other crimes. Essentially the judge was like if you feel like was trying to commit another crime listed here you can convict based on that. They never told the defense what crime they are saying was the predicate and they tried to call an expert witness from the FEC and were shot down because Merchan made the testimony so narrow that it wouldn't be worth it. It is insane he was convicted over crimes he was never even charged with nor did the prosecution try to even prove. I can't wait until the jurors start making their rounds to cash in. I am willing to bet money there will be at least one dummy who will say something like "I knew he was a criminal before I was even put on the jury, I told my family on day one I was going make sure Trump was going to be convicted."

They are all trying to appear non biased so when it is a big story that they can't just ignore they print it. There are plenty of instance on all news media where they ignore stories or bury them when they don't match their worldview. Just because they printed this story doesn't change the fact they have ignored or mislead on a myriad of other stories

They weren't chosen by lawyers on both sides, see if 8 out of 10 are Democrats in Manhatten you get a pool of 100 80 should be Democrats and 20 should be Republicans. Each side gets only so many vetos without cause and the judge gets to determine who should be dismissed with cause. Since this case is political in nature, lets not kid ourselves here if the defendents name wasn't Trump he would never of been indicted, every lever was used was against Trump. Judge was a Democrat whose daughter owns a company that literally does fundraising for Democrats only, he had clear conflict of interest in the first degree.

He did have the chance and didn't do it. If he wins and regains power? All bets are off.

What additional crime? They never actually said what it was Merchan gave the jury of a menu of what they could choose even though they never actually explained the crimes or the FACT he was never even indicted for any of those other crimes. Merchan didn't allow the FEC expert to take the stand to explain why the hush money payments were not a campaign violation. Merchan didn't recuse himself when his own daughter works for Democrats to help them fund raise and literally was making money off the trial Merchan allowed the testimony of Stormy Daniels even though it had 0 bearing on the case. Merchan didn't grant a change of venue when there was 0 way Trump would get a fair trial in Manhattan which voted over 80% democrat. They seated a jury in less than a week, whereas in most cases of this nature would of taken months to seat. Merchan put a gag order on Trump not allowing him to respond to prosecution witnesses attacking him. Merchan show undue favoritism towards the prosecution essentially allowing them to say and do whatever they want while overruling and admonishing the defense for objecting too much Merchan threatened a defense witness with striking his testimony and yelled at him for rolling his eyes at the judge because the judge was sustaining every objection the prosecution made. Jury's look towards the judge to call balls and strikes but when the defense was batting it seemed like the strike zone was from dugout to dugout and when the prosecution was batting the dug out was the size of the catcher mitt. This entire trial was designed with a giant thumb on the scales of lady justice to get the verdict they wanted.

No because if he cited Fox News you all would claim fake news. I will always cite a liberals news site if they are reporting the same thing as Fox because you all can't disregard it based on the messenger.

Did Trump say he talked to Putin about it? So he claimed he could free him quick? So to prove him wrong, I have an idea help Trump win the Whitehouse and see if he can do it and when he doesn't you can come back and rub it in our faces.

Nobody is saying we are in a recession not even conservative news, so don't blame Fox. A lot of people don't know exactly what a recession is but they do know when they have to pinch pennies because they can't afford things they used to. It may not be a recession in name but it is a recession in feeling. Their salaries aren't even keeping up with inflation so their savings are dwindling and their credit cards are maxed and people who were living paycheck to paycheck before are now having dig deeper to find ways to live.

So the Lincoln project is back pissing in the wind.

I can usually can tell what industry is hurting when I am looking to hire and the last time I hired someone I was getting tons of resumes from people who worked for title companies and mortgage companies. I am also seeing far fewer closings coming across our desks in general.

Oh yeah retribution is coming. The problem with the left is they have tunnel vision, they want everything now and don't even contemplate the not so great backlash that is bound to happen. I remember when Harry Reid used the "nuclear option" and killed the filibuster for judges and the result was gnashing of teeth when Trump got to nominate 3 judges to the Supreme Court and the Dems could do nothing to stop it. Now we have lawfare going on against political opponents, it is a bad look no matter how you try to spin it. If it was just the documents case it wouldn't be that bad but they are going after him for accounting entries and have judges nakedly putting their thumbs on the scales to ensure convictions. It looks straight up political. Do they not think that when a Republican is in power they won't try the same thing. Trumps DOJ can easily indict Biden over his dealings, revisit Hilary's servers, go after everyone involved with the Trump indictments for election interference and conspiracy. I have a feeling there will be many raids of people offices and houses during the Trump administration which they will call Hitler type behavior but remember they started it. Funniest thing is it is all backfiring and Trump may very well win and they are realizing their biggest nightmare. If you had just let sleeping dogs lie Trump may not even of been the nominee. The polling prior to the indictment wasn't so great for Trump.

This is the liberal playbook they take one thing he says and then takes it completely out of context. Just like the bloodbath comment that was about the chinese automakers but they decided it meant if loses there will be a bloodbath and Civil War.

It won't be. It will probably be Ron D'Santis vs Gavin Newsome.

I would say an adult discussion means just make your prediction. I am not saying who would be good I am just saying who the Republicans would put up.

I think if Biden bows out they will be forced to use Kamala. If Trump bows out I think the Republicans will put up Nikky Haley.

Of course they know what is going to happen if Trump gets back in the White House, get ready for raids, terminations, supoenas and indictments. Don't worry Dems, he will make sure its fair, we will make sure to make all the cases happen in only the most red areas in with judges who donated to Trump with kids who work for Republicans. Just to be fair and even and treat the Democrat criminal defendents with same fairness and respect that you showed Trump. When the riots inevitably happen we will leave no stone unturned and keep them all jail for years without trial for the most trivial of charges for their insurrection.

You can't call it a lie without EVIDENCE, just like your middle school remedial math tells you show your math.

Yeah only 3500 could attend the rally itself but there were far more outside the rally. Before thinking you got us now, actually research enough to know what you are talking about.

First of all the Trump campaign didn't create it and second I don't think it was a choice its like a power point template, it took random WW1 era headlines to make it look like a vintage paper. I think whoever made it never noticed it either. If you look at its not in your face nor even in focus. CNN had to stop the video and zoom in because no one would of even noticed it.

Yet you happily accept the constant "corrections" of Biden's speeches after the fact and they are literally editing his speeches after the fact in the transcripts.

Robo: only 25,000 showed up it was massive failure for Trump especially since he bussed them all in and paid them to pretend to be Trump supporters, that is what AOC said and she is an expert she is a super genius economist.

Yeah because Biden and Democrats are using lawfare to commit the largest election interference scheme in history. Your bragging about case brought to you by the DNC and act like it was Trumps fault. We found out Cohen is a thief but Bragg was willing to look over that to get Trump on accounting entries. We are talking about the difference between grand larceny and a misdemeanor.