Deluge

Racism is all left all the time. It's why you treat black people like adorable mor*ns. You can't stfu about them.

History can be taught just fine without bringing the Rosa Parks beating to the forefront. We're not going to let you stinking race hustlers guilt white kids into submission.

What questions, silly democrat? Gorbachev was a reformer. He introduced "glasnost" and "perestroika". With the help of Ronald Reagan, he saw how destructive communism is and decided to make the changes.

Not really. Reagan had already left a great impression, and GHWB was smart enough to not screw up Reagan's work. Besides, it wasn't even a year after Reagan left office that the wall came down.

It's too bad the left doesn't paint black people in a positive way. In talking to you racists, one would think that all blacks everywhere are helpless and stupid. lol CRT is trash and so are its adherents.

It's an excellent point, Jim Crow, thank you for acknowledging that fact. You know, you racists wouldn't be so bad if you'd just pull your heads out of the left's ass.

YOUR opinion, Rebound, not another word salad. I gave you a yes or no question: In YOUR opinion, should the US get out of this "legally binding obligation" so that we never have to go to war again? Yes or no?

Rebound, you don't know what you're talking about - you're a democrat, for f*ck's sake. lol Reagan was a superior president. he was one of the best. He was also a statesman - something none of your piece of shit presidents have even come close to - John F Kennedy is an exception but he hardly resembled today's democrats; it's a laugh to even think about it. USSR is gone, and President Reagan is a huge part of that. None of your moronic presidents would have been a part of that, in fact they probably would've been Lenin and Stalin disciples encouraging Gorbachev to keep the USSR intact.

Thanks to Reagan. Without Reagan, and the influence of the US, Gorbachev would've kept things status quo. Reagan was the best President in the last 60 0r 70 years - maybe even farther back than that.

Oh, it wouldn't be you giving me a lesson, lol. It would be me ripping your bullshit apart. You can retract the word "throughout" and start over, if you like.

Are you saying that the US should get out of this "legally binding obligation" so that we never have to go to war again?

Sorry, chump, even with Trump's faults, he still beats the shit out of your guy, and it's not even a debate. I'm sure you disagree, so let's take a closer look at Trump's accomplishments: https://www.mcleancountyrepublicans.org/trump_administration_accomplishments Now, go get a list of Biden's accomplishments and we'll compare the two. Oh, and I disagree. He was being diplomatic, first.

I'd say that is more like a request. We know for a fact that threatening Ukrainian leaders to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid unless they fired a prosecutor who was looking into a Biden money laundering operation isn't diplomatic, in fact it was probably illegal.

Diplomacy is the key here. Trump was being diplomatic, first.

Just say that you don't have an opinion on any of the three things I just asked you about, and I'll let it rest - unless, of course, I find you later sharing your thoughts on one of those three, and then we will talk about where you stand at that time.

Point out where I said it did.

Nope. Anything that even has a whiff of CRT in it needs to go.

I've been in that part maybe once - it was pretty nice.

But you do have opinions on things like climate, abortion, or curtailing other people's speech, right?

I see, so it's the actual topic that draws you in, not Trump? I don't see any kind of axis rising from the Kremlin, so you're safe there. Glad to see that you don't have a hard on for war, like some other democrats seem to have.

OK, then based on that m*ronic word salad you just served up, I'm going to go ahead and say "Yes". Yes you are in favor of going to war. Now, have you considered the impact of your fake president's decision should he decide to go to war? The cost of human lives? the fact that yet another democrat president would be leading us to war? There was a time where nanny statists were opposed to war. Has that changed for you?

Then you should be commenting on every f*cking thing that comes out of Washington, and I don't see you nearly that busy. I asked if you thought we should go to war. Are you opposed to that idea or just undecided?

Interesting. You wouldn't happen to have the schedule of payments throughout his presidency would you? Or are you just making that shit up?

I don't agree with what he did with Iran, but what other arms deals are you talking about? You said "throughout his presidency"; what are you referring to there? Reagan was no traitor. Democrats, on the other hand, fit the traitor profile so much better.

I have the exact same feelings about California, and I used to LOVE visiting there. My mom is from California, and I have relatives that still live there.