CrakHoBarbie

Please explain in detail how InBevs use of a trans spokesperson has imposed on you.

The left will never stop moving forward with the acceptance and normalization of trans folk and homosexuals in American society. This has been happening, incrementally, for quite some time. I think it's absolutely adorable how you think you can stop the wheels of progress with your bigoted religious zealot garbage. Your ilk is like a leaf in a hurricane.

Because they partnered with a person who's sexuality you find disgusting, right?

Some folks fear the fact that they are sexually attracted to them. So, like children, they lash out against the very thing that makes them tingle in their nether regions and forces them to feel shame. I hope this clarifies things for you https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/roots/franklin.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiYqMeW77P-AhVWOkQIHVq9Dl0QFnoECAkQAg&usg=AOvVaw0DP-IG5wqNuJfxh-rESF8y https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiYqMeW77P-AhVWOkQIHVq9Dl0QFnoECAQQAg&usg=AOvVaw2CNZ-fPfjzEzj-p0nAAFiw

Agreed. But we're your panties in a ruffle before they partnered with a trans spokesperson? I'll bet they weren't

You've posted a moronic contention that denies the validity of a known dictionary definition.

prove my point for me

And you've posted a moronic contention that denies the validity of a known dictionary definition. Try and do better.

Said the guy who thinks that other people are required to prove his claims for him. You've got shit room to talk.

If you cannot support your contentions with citations, then your contentions are nothing more than opinion. Opinion- the cornerstone of all GOP claims.

Absolute nonsense. Total moronic contention on your part..

It is considered bad form to make a claim on a public forum, then expect someone else to prove that claim for you. If you cannot prove your own claim, through citations, just admit you were wrong, or admit your claim is only opinion, and move forward.

I gave you the dictionary definition. I see you've chosen to ignore reality, which you are certainly free to do. But your ignorance of reality does not change reality. It just appeases your willingness to remain ignorant.

There has always been a portion of American society that sees trans folk as an abomination. But, we are seeing society becoming more accepting of trans folk in general..... This has been happening incrementally over decades.... On a similar path as acceptance of homosexuals. I do believe we will get there eventually..... But we certainly aren't there yet.

Well, truthfully, you're not just multiposting on this issue because your concerned with InBevs shareholders losses. Stop by the old mirror sometimes. Like I said, I like your style, but do not expect me to coddle you because of it.

trans·pho·bic /ˌtranzˈfōbik/ adjective having or showing a dislike of or strong prejudice against transgender people.

In the final analysis, I could care less who InBev partners with because, in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't affect me personally. You, and your alt-right brethren, on the other hand, have taken this partnership personally..... It's not personal.... It's just business....... InBev's business...... And you may hem and haw all year long saying you've bothered posting because InBev blablabla..... But the real reason this bugs you and your pals, is because you're transphobic. You just can't stand to see a company whose products you may or may not use, partner with a trans woman. So keep up the whining. I expect nothing more from you.

Wow... Big post... You just stew as long as needed. It's what your good at. InBevs not worried in the least. https://finance.yahoo.com/video/anheuser-busch-stock-loses-over-195046945.html ?

And now their stock has rebounded. To assume this was anything more than a blip for a corporation as large as InBev would be foolish. This is evident as they didn't even fire Ms. Mulvaney. She is still their spokesperson and their stock is right back up. Funny how so many rightwingers are so concerned for the health of Bud light p_ss water.

InBev is wide awake. And their stock is doing great. Snooze you lose.

This is choice. You're contending that InBev, the World's largest beer supplier, are inept at marketing? As I already posted, this was a tiny blip for InBev as is evident by the fact that their stock has already recovered and Ms. Mulvaney is still a spokesperson for InBev. https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/bud

In my view, the only law they need to pass is one that requires parental and trained professional approval, and not until they are 18 unless there are other determining circumstances.

You have mentioned your suppositions many, many times. Why not try something new and cite some actual evidence of wrongdoing.

As Ive already shown you, their stock has rebounded and they have not dismissed the trans spokesperson. Thus, it is readily apparent that bud and Ms. Mulvaney have weathered this blip with ease.

I doubt it. Their stock has already began to rebound. And you may of noticed, they didn't fire the trans spokesperson. https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/bud