CrakHoBarbie

If, as you claim, your God exists, please present tangible evidence if his existence. Or, just be an adult and admit that your belief is based on "faith" alone.

How does "prayer" prove your God is the one true God? Are you adult enough to admit right now that your belief in God is based on faith alone?

That you feel compelled to tell me how smart you are, proves you're an id iot, boy. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DzgHXHtHSsNo&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiT073N8umCAxVTOUQIHSK0CEAQtwJ6BAgFEAE&usg=AOvVaw2-1wI74xtxXmS-siUqmJmk

Another stupid statement you cannot support with a citation. Have you always been such a weak and inconsequential person?

I asked you a question halfwit. Out of the over 2000 God's created by the imagination of man, what makes your God the one and only God?

2 billion followers, and not one shred of tangible evidence the God of Abraham exists. Proof your religion is a cult.

There have been over 2000 "Gods" created with the imagination of Man. Just what makes your God the one "true" God?

That we exist isn't proof that your fictional God created us, pinhead

It's OK. The God whos tenets denounced this type of activity doesn't really exit.

This warms my heart ❤️

Agreed. "A person's sense of morality lessens as his or her power increases". The statement was made by Lord Acton, a British historian of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. So knowing that “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” we should be ever more vigilant in our assessments and oversight when dealing with our front line of defense against crime. But, in this arena, we have failed miserably and Chauvin is just one more reminder of that failure.

Well, according to the 1964 Civil rights act, it is illegal to refuse to serve someone based on a customer's national origin, sex, religion, color or race. But.... Businesses can refuse to serve someone if doing so violates their religious beliefs. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.axios.com/2023/06/30/supreme-court-lgbtq-wedding-website&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjNoJzi8-eCAxXiO0QIHSBIAwYQFnoECAkQAg&usg=AOvVaw2Y-D6AGe_1Pk5bXoDzCKee But, as I said... if a baker is forced to make a cake for someone they think is an abomination, that customer is, more than likely, going to end up with a belly full of excrement.

So you are OK with forced labor as long as it's forcing the business owner to comply and not the actual workers. Got it.

Coming from a more on like you, it's a compliment pinhead

Coming from a "Id iot" like you, that's a compliment.

I cannot abide by forcing someone to work for someone they do not want to work for. If a worker applies for a job and while doing so, finds out the company owner is a raging antisemite. Are you going to force the worker to take that job? Because forcing someone to work for someone they aren't comfortable working with is the same, regardless of which foot the shoe is on.

Only the stu pid ones, pinhead.

They convicted him of manslaughter because of the callus indifference he displayed whilst detaining a suspect. You can puff up all you like displaying your right wing stu pidity, won't change a thing halfwit.

And you are an insipid ignoramus with a brain the size of a walnut.

You cannot squeeze "being a good person" from a religious zealot that thinks your way of life is an abomination. Philosophically, you are absolutely correct and I fully agree with you. But, in actual application, it's not going to be seen as a reasonable request by folks who simply don't give a fck.

Force a religious zealot baker to make a cake for someone they stupidly think is an abomination, that someone is going to end up with a belly full of excrement. That's the unfortune reality here.

You can talk to me directly. This 3rd grader is here for you.

I see your reasoning and you have valid concerns. That said, I'm not going to be forced to work for someone I do not want to work for and I wouldn't expect anyone else to work for someone they weren't comfortable working for. Now, gays seeking to force religious zealots to make their wedding cakes involves risk. Who knows what that cake maker is going to do to that cake if they are forced to comply. There's a World of bakers out their happy to comply without litigation.

You are a halfwitted troglodyte. Your problem is that you arrogantly think your ignorant opinion has as much merit as the opinion of those of us whom are educated. In reality, if you had any brains, you'd take them out and try to eat them. Grow up boy, and get your finger out of your nose.

All medical decisions must include the parents. But schools should not be required to inform parents of their child's sexual orientation. Nobody in America should be forced to work for anyone who they do not want to work for. Why in the World would any homosexual want a religious zealot making their wedding cake? It makes no sense. Police are necessary. But, because of police culture and unions, bad apples are not weeded out, which is a necessity. This is a huge problem that infests nearly every police force Worldwide. If you can't see that, than you are more of an id iot than Id previously presumed.