DONKIROCK

Judge Joe Brown With An Interesting Story About Donald Trump (12:42) https://youtu.be/-Rkmd5v7I5I I am presenting you this video (go to 5:20) as a way to help you better understand that I believe we have become too sensitive as a society.

Help me plan my politically romantic evening with Tulsi Gabbard! (Or maybe a romantically political evening?) I would try to interest her in watching this with me. Maybe a bottle of wine would help her get into it. But if she was cool with burning a bowl, that would be even better! ? How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World | Eps.1 Introduction | The Epoch Times | (33:43) What do you think? Somewhere in that 33 minutes she wouldn't be able to control herself and she'd be all over me. Do you think I being too optimistic? ?

I think there's a wisp of evidence that Pence was pressured to certify the 2020 election What Mike Dense, er Pence orchestrated was to put us only one triggering event away from possible civil war. Normally, iinm, it takes two or more elections with instances of voter fraud before partisans can "sell" others on the idea that they will never be able to trust the system to assure a fair election unless the activists take things into their own hands. By Pence failing to do a 9 day quick review of the nationwide election system, future activists (from any of three motivations or more) can say that the fraudulent 2020 results were the first of the two required compromised election events. Pence was stupid. He should have followed the advice of the 100 nationwide lawmakers who united to formally request Pence take the time to review the system before giving the 2020 election results to Speaker Pelosi and thus certifying to her and the people of this country, that the results are honest and accurate. And everyone knows there was reasonable doubt. And anyone who knows how important an honest, transparent, healthy and well run election system is to our Republic would tell you that no expense should be spared or effort not taken to dispel ANY DOUBTS about the system's integrity which might be used to rig a one trigger any future existential threats. That's one possibility. Another is that Pence wasn't dense. Pence was possibly made an offer he couldn't refuse. So, he possibly sold Trump down the road, and in the case that this is true, would bear the responsibility for inflicting the greatest potential damage to this country since the first shot was fired at Ft. Sumter. And if you consider Trump's attitude toward Pence since J6, I think it is consistent with how I would react if I knew Pence HAD to deliver the bogus results to Pelosi or something very bad would have happened. I would wish he could have resisted that pressure. But I would know he only did what he had to do. That's the attitude I detect when I see him speak of Pence. And that expression is explained by the belief that Pence acted under duress. Otherwise, I would expect more anger or bitterness from Trump.

Yeah, I heard about the unique opportunity Hobbs enjoys to cheat as Secy of St. All eyes will be on any of her possible attempts to cheat. It's like going to a David Blane magic demonstration. You know he's going to try something and you're watching him like a hawk, but begosh and begora, he does it anyway. What Mike Dense, er Pence orchestrated was to put us only one triggering event away from possible civil war. Normally, iinm, it takes two or more elections with instances of voter fraud before partisans can "sell" others on the idea that they will never be able to trust the system to assure a fair election unless the activists take things into their own hands. By Pence failing to do a 9 day quick review of the nationwide election system, future activists (from any of three motivations or more) can say that the fraudulent 2020 results were the first of the two required compromised election events. Pence was stupid. He should have followed the advice of the 100 nationwide lawmakers who united to formally request Pence take the time to review the system before giving the 2020 election results to Speaker Pelosi and thus certifying to her and the people of this country, that the results are honest and accurate. And everyone knows there was reasonable doubt. And anyone who knows how important an honest, transparent, healthy and well run election system is to our Republic would tell you that no expense should be spared or effort not taken to dispel ANY DOUBTS about the system's integrity which might be used to rig a one trigger any future existential threats. That's one possibility. Another is that Pence wasn't dense. Pence was possibly made an offer he couldn't refuse. So, he possibly sold Trump down the road, and in the case that this is true, would bear the responsibility for inflicting the greatest potential damage to this country since the first shot was fired at Ft. Sumter. And if you consider Trump's attitude toward Pence since J6, I think it is consistent with how I would react if I knew Pence HAD to deliver the bogus results to Pelosi or something very bad would have happened. I would wish he could have resisted that pressure. But I would know he only did what he had to do. That's the attitude I detect when I see him speak of Pence.

I hoped that you were not going to get this wrong. But you got it wrong in an unexpected way. The two examples are different demonstrations of the same dynamic. Making fun of a disabled reporter would have been an example of someone being mocked because of something he was not responsible for. The reporter was BORN with his handicap. He would likely choose to be "normal" if he could. Making fun of a dimwitted poster is an example of someone being mocked because of something he was not responsible for. The dimwitted poster was BORN with his handicap, too. He would likely choose to be "smarter" if he could. Education is a good thing for Demwits to try to overcome their birth defect. But education guarantees nothing. I regularly encounter posters with college degrees, even advanced degrees, who are dimwitted or "Demwitted." And the lucky ones think they are smart, and that is probably good or else they would have to live their entire lives feeling like 2nd class citizens. I didnt think you would have forgotten so quickly that Trump had been exonerated of the bogus charge that he supposedly mocked the reporter's handicap. But, (and I'm being charitable to you because I suspect you were born a dimwit) I guess it may be a challenge for you to keep things straight, so here is the proof (AGAIN?) that Trump routinely used that gesture and voice to show anyone who was confounded by the truth. Even a brilliantly brainy and normally abled guy like Ted Cruz. Brandon Straka, founder of #WalkAway. Unfiltered: 'The left practices tolerance in the most superficial ways' (9:57) https://youtu.be/1AkbfmMNVP8

I wanted to be sure. ??

I would check the Bongino podcast later tonight.

As resently as when Elon Musk originally announced he was going to buy Twitter, I felt a pang of sympathy for those employees who would be fired at the Left Wing snake pit. Today, I heard that Musk would can 75% of Twitter's workers and I thought, "GOOD!"

She is the real deal.

This is actually a serious question. I hope any thoughtful Democrats will post a thoughtful reply I will pay you the appropriate respect if your reply is respectful. ?

KARI LAKE TO BE INTERVIEWED ON THE DAN BONGINO SHOW IN THE 11:00AM PST SEGMENT (Fri. 10/21/22) https://www.wbap.com/shows/dan-bongino-show/

I asked her and she said you are a Trannie. ??

BLM Co-Founder Admits; "We Are Trained Marxists" (1:09) Would you support Tulsi if she endorsed BLM and then quit and joined the GOP? Why or why not?

Which is more offensive, to make fun of a handicapped reporter or bash a dim witted political poster?

It is not just a matter of defeating the Dems, but preserving, protecting and defending America and ourselves from even what WE might do errantly or misguidedly.