robosmith

You keep stating ^this WITH NO SUBSTANTIATION. What is YOUR EXPERTISE to make ^this summary judgement? It is really not as SIMPLE as you apparently believe. Here the complex and nuanced REALITY by an EXPERT: The Classification Status of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Documents I doubt you can even understand that article enough to make a case with cites, that you've not just pulled your opinion out of your ass.

You're certainly NOT a teacher of ANY kind. It is you who needs to grow up and learn grammar.

Physician heal thyself. What YOU BELIEVE to be similar is obviously very slanted to fit your agenda of vilifying the FBI at every opportunity; including invoking conspiracy theories as "facts." For example: "whether or not information contained in other FBI applications is reliable" = "over every FBI investigation ever conducted" is a FALSE EQUIVALENCE: "other" =/= "every" and certainly NOT "ever conducted." Time for you step up and APOLIGIZE for your misrepresentations. Not that I expect you will admit to being WRONG.

It's very simple. If you don't remember what someone said, LOOK IT UP, or DON'T USE DOUBLE QUOTES. "Something similar" may be good enough for you, but it's NOT A QUOTE.

Your strawman is asking a question, assuming an affirmative answer, and then calling your assumed answer ridiculous. The answer to your question is NO. OBVIOUSLY there was classified info that was REDACTED. You really don't understand that?

It is YOUR strawman which is ridiculous. Even Fox knows that. Check out the Chiron. Yes he put a lock on the storage room months later, but they also found documents in his desk drawers.

What is OBVIOUS is that those STOLEN documents were found improperly stored at Mar-a-Lago. Also obvious is that NO "break in" was required, since the SS let them in. Quite possible that it was the SS which reported the crimes, too since they are Federal LEO. Your training wrt obvious was a bust.

Too bad you have NO EVIDENCE for ^this or YOU MIGHT be able bring Joe down. ㊙️Pix from a laptop that were illegally leaked by the repair guy, will not stand up as evidence of drug use in court.

The picture was from the court filing responding to Trump's special master request. You've presented NO EVIDENCE it was "leaked."

You don't get it. The cult believes Trump is above the law.

What is foolish about strongly opposing someone who cares more about personal power than the will of the electorate and is willing to lie and incite violence to keep personal power? IMO, Trump believes he is above the law based on his claims of absolute immunity. Trump claims he has “absolute immunity” from Jan. 6 lawsuits in new court filing And it's NOT the first time he's tried that.

It wasn't the FBI I heard telling about their COMMON PRACTICES wrt to evidence gathering. As I said, it was ex-FBI agents. Don't really care what some propagandist named Wheeler says. Does she even have experience working for FBI? Doesn't sound like she does.

You're the one who said Hillary did it. The company which managed her server was NOT "her staff," and they were just belatedly carrying our orders from months earlier. That machine was in THEIR possession at that time.

I'm NOT an expert and I never claimed to be one. I heard ex-FBI agents say it is COMMON to take pictures of evidence that way. You've "never seen" it because you've never had the chance, but for some reason you're pretending that means something. Can't imagine why you believe your personal experience or imagination is relevant.

No evidence to believe ^this OPINION. ?

So you didn't read where it said the statement was about "MARKED CLASSIFIED" documents.

I posted EVIDENCE from the nations premier news source. You don't get to dismiss it with MERE PERSONAL CLAIMS or because you didn't read what it says. Where is YOUR evidence? If you try that again, you will be ignored.

It was in a document filed with the court in response to Trump's special master filing. Ex-FBI officials have stated it is COMMON to take pictures of evidence that way. Are you an expert? Ever attended an FBI evidence collection operation? What is Wheeler's expertise in that area? I'm guessing NONE.

Prove it. Your mere claims mean NOTHING because you've thrown them around gratuitously.

Where? AFAIK, the server was ordered wiped well before the subpoena and when the COMPANY which MANAGED it figured out it hadn't been done, they went ahead and did it. You're lying when you say Hillary did any of that after a subpoena was issued .He did the same thing. But his classified documents were CLEARLY MARKED. I think it's funny that you believe Hillary knew how to Bleachbit or even what it is.

The SIGNED statement says there was no more documents which were MARKED CLASSIFIED. That was FALSE and obstruction. Lock him up.

Did you even read what it says? It was still MARKED CLASSIFIED. Duh. And it was ALWAYS government property even AFTER Trump stole it.

^This BS may work with for Trump with his cult, but I KNOW BETTER to believe you when ALL YOU HAVE is CLAIMS. Trump Lawyer Told Justice Dept. That Classified Material Had Been Returned The FACT is, ^this was a lie and many more documents were recovered last month. Sorry you missed it, again. If all you have is more empty claims, then don't bother, cause that's never going to work for you.

The Espionage Act says otherwise. Did you even read it? ㊙️Filing a false affidavit is LYING to the FBI which is most definitely a CRIME. Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to that crime.

*I* have no knowledge from where the nuclear secrets allegation came; I just know that it doesn't matter wrt the crimes being investigated. You said the laptop was 100% legit. You've posted NO evidence proving that nor that the FBI lied about it being Russian disinformation. Anything that's currently on the laptop COULD BE Russians tampering with it since the chain of custody is garbage. Unlike the right wing propaganda sites, CNN actually has the journalistic ethical principles to FIRE managers and reporters who don't conform to professional ethical standards. You got ANY evidence that Fox has EVER done that?