robosmith

I don't "KNOW" anything just cause YOU CLAIM IT. As usual you can't even post a link, so AGAIN, NO CREDIBILITY. So I googled "CRT definition" and found the Britannica entry: You're WRONG, AGAIN.

Well, at least you ATTMEPTED a reason for your LIE. Were you EVER actually taught about LEGAL PRACTICES in grade school? I know I WAS NOT.

You've already asserted that you don't care about the truth of Republican House investigations, you just want to stick it to the libs.

NOT EVEN a REASON to believe ^this OPINION, let alone EVIDENCE. LMAO

The FACT is, Trump DID INCITE the violence. And PROVED that's what he WANTED by doing NOTHING to STOP IT, until it was CLEAR that it FAILED.

Considering you were a witness to NONE of what HAPPENED, "your eyes" mean NOTHING.

Actually I POSTED EVIDENCE. It's in the Jan 6th Report that YOU REFUSE TO READ. SWORN testimony by Hershman. You've been BUSTED for LYING AGAIN.

The thing is, CRT is about institutionalization of racist LEGAL practices and policies. The idea that LEGAL practices are being taught to kids (or that they will understand them) is just ridiculous. That racism may be being taught about to kids DOES NOT make it about CRT.

Too bad you have NO EVIDENCE for ^THIS BULLSHIT. I think you meant Eastman, who personally ADMITTED that his proposal IS ILLEGAL to Hershman, according to HIS SWORN TESTIMONY. You would know that if you actually paid attention to THE EVIDENCE. It was Eastman who said Pence could throw out the EC electors on a whim. AKA, anti-democratic BULLSHIT.

Because YOU KEEP REPEATING your FANTASIES as FACT with NO EVIDENCE. Very little was "warped" about that election, but you believe a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR named Trump. That is DELUSIONAL.

Did you ever bother to look up the DEFINITION? Attacking Congress to overturn the election FITS PERFECTLY.

What reports? You mean what Fox News told you? NY Times tells the truth but you won't listen.

NY Times says you're WRONG, and they have A LOT more credibility than YOU. Just cause you ignore the evidence does NOT make it go away, it just FEEDS your DELUSIONS.

He really is stupid enough to try to apply his OWN DEFINITION to a meme and believes it is a legitimate argument. LMAO

She had no reason to stand on something unless she was planning to go through the window.

Don't encourage his LIES and DELUSIONS.

It is NOT a LIE if they suffered FATAL injuries that day. AKA died as a RESULT.

Obstruction of the transfer of power as determined by the election IS insurrection.

Thing is, you weren't there and are LYING ABOUT their injuries ANYWAY.

IF you believe asking a question is lying, you're delusional.

Blocking traffic AFTER refusing to move; NOT jaywalking. Anyone else would be charged just the same.

You're LYING. I want insurrectionists INTENT ON STOPPING the peaceful transfer of power dead IF they employ violence to STOP IT.

NOTHING criminal about counting the EC votes AS REQUIRED by the Constitution. ^More delusion from YOU.

Like you do here, DAILY.

NOT when it's CLOSED like it was THAT DAY. Duh.